Table 3. Stratified analyses of different biopsy schemes.
n | Sample size* | Heterogeneity | MR/US fusion biopsy vs System biopsies | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ph | I2, % | RR (95%CI) | p | |||
Total | 16 | 3013/3105 | 0.14 | 28 | 1.06 (1.01, 1.12)a | 0.03a |
1.09 (1.01, 1.18)b | 0.02b | |||||
Low MRI suspicion | 4 | 253/554 | 0.05 | 63 | 0.36 (0.26, 0.49) | < 0.01 |
0.36 (0.21, 0.63) | < 0.01 | |||||
Moderate/High MRI suspicion | 4 | 365/554 | 0.61 | 0 | 1.46 (1.28, 1.67) | < 0.01 |
1.43 (1.27, 1.63) | < 0.01 | |||||
Clinically significant PCa | 10 | 2481/2583 | 0.46 | 0 | 1.19 (1.10, 1.29) | < 0.01 |
1.19 (1.10, 1.28) | < 0.01 | |||||
Clinically insignificant PCa | 10 | 2395/2494 | 0.08 | 43 | 0.68 (0.59, 0.79) | < 0.01 |
0.66 (0.51, 0.86) | < 0.01 |
CI = confidence interval; RD = risk difference.
Ph values for heterogeneity from Q-test.
MR/US fusion biopsy sample size/System biopsies sample size
Fixed effect model was used when heterogeneity Ph >0.05.
Random effect model was used when heterogeneity Ph <0.05.