Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 20;6(41):43571–43580. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6201

Table 3. Stratified analyses of different biopsy schemes.

n Sample size* Heterogeneity MR/US fusion biopsy vs System biopsies
Ph I2, % RR (95%CI) p
Total 16 3013/3105 0.14 28 1.06 (1.01, 1.12)a 0.03a
1.09 (1.01, 1.18)b 0.02b
Low MRI suspicion 4 253/554 0.05 63 0.36 (0.26, 0.49) < 0.01
0.36 (0.21, 0.63) < 0.01
Moderate/High MRI suspicion 4 365/554 0.61 0 1.46 (1.28, 1.67) < 0.01
1.43 (1.27, 1.63) < 0.01
Clinically significant PCa 10 2481/2583 0.46 0 1.19 (1.10, 1.29) < 0.01
1.19 (1.10, 1.28) < 0.01
Clinically insignificant PCa 10 2395/2494 0.08 43 0.68 (0.59, 0.79) < 0.01
0.66 (0.51, 0.86) < 0.01

CI = confidence interval; RD = risk difference.

Ph values for heterogeneity from Q-test.

*

MR/US fusion biopsy sample size/System biopsies sample size

a

Fixed effect model was used when heterogeneity Ph >0.05.

b

Random effect model was used when heterogeneity Ph <0.05.