Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr;5(2):174–186. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.07.01

Table 1. Key points.

Incidence of breast cancer 1 in 8 in Australia
Only 33% choose to have reconstruction despite an 82% psychosocial improvement
Implant use has increased by 11% per year from 1998-2008 and now exceeds autologous reconstruction
Indication and patient selection
   Most patients are candidates for prosthetic reconstruction
   Consider clinicopathological features when making decision
   Patients with small, minimally ptotic breasts are suitable for immediate reconstruction
   Patients with large, ptotic breasts or who need radiotherapy are better suited to delayed reconstruction
Breast reconstruction in the elderly
   Older patients tolerate reconstruction well and can have fewer complications
Risks and complications
   Common complications-capsular contracture, hematoma and infection
   Risks for complications-smoking, obesity, large breast volume, diabetes, higher grade tumors
   Multifactorial-bacterial colonization, type/texture/placement of implant and radiotherapy
   Incidence of significant capsular contracture up to 209%
Types of prostheses
   Silicone vs. saline
      Higher capsular contracture rate in silicone
      Higher satisfaction and quality of life scores for silicone
      Silicone not associated with cancer, immunological or systemic disease
   Round vs. anatomic
      No significant difference
      Anatomic implants may feel firmer and have less rippling
   Textured vs. smooth
      Textured have lower risk of capsular contracture
      Smooth more likely to be displaced and cause more pain on expansion
   Integrated vs. distant port
      No significant difference
Timing of reconstruction
   Immediate
      Best aesthetic outcomes if no radiotherapy needed
      Higher rate of complications, capsular contracture, implant failure and revision surgery
   Delayed-immediate
      Achieve similar aesthetic results to immediate reconstruction
      Preserves the breast skin if radiotherapy required
   Delayed
       Fewer complications than immediate reconstruction
       Better aesthetic results if radiotherapy required compared to immediate reconstruction
       “Delayed-delayed”-for locally advanced breast cancer patients requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Improves aesthetics and reduces psychological disadvantages associated with DBR
Radiotherapy
       Increases risk of capsular contracture-occurs in 68% of irradiated breasts
       Higher risk of complications and reconstruction failure
       More likely to need revision surgery
       Lower patient satisfaction with outcome
Outcomes
      High satisfaction rates with prosthetic reconstruction
      Cosmesis better accepted if patient better informed
      Better aesthetic outcomes associated with having bilateral reconstruction and not having radiotherapy
      Patients receive best treatment in hospitals with multidisciplinary breast team

DBR, delayed breast reconstruction.