Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 8;27(4):1281–1386. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3440-3

Table 12.

Smoking and bone health in children and adolescents

Reference Study description Population description Number of subjects End points Results
Prospective studies
 Lappe et al. 2001 [42] This prospective study of female army recruits examined risk factors for developing stress fractures during 8 weeks of basic training. Sex: female
Age: 21.1 ± 3.7 years
Race: 31 % black, 53 % white, 16 % other
Location: USA
Years: 1995–1996
3758 Stress fracture Odds ratios (95 % CI)
History of smoking 1.34 (1.05–1.71)
Years smoked 1.05 (1.02–1.08)
•Adjusted for age, race and bone speed of sound
 Elgan et al. 2003 [240] This prospective study is a 2-year follow-up of the cohort reported in 2002 and investigated the joint effects of OC use and smoking. Smoking reported as monthly average. Twenty-eight subjects smoked as follows: n = 1, >25 cig/day; n = 6, 15–24 cig/day; n = 16, 5–14 cig/day;, n = 4, ≤4 cig/day. Sex: female
Age: 18–26
Race: not reported
Location: Lund, Sweden
Year(s): 2001
118 Peripheral DXA Difference from reference group, nonsmoker/no OC use (n = 35)
Heel aBMD Smoker/no OC use (n = 9) Nonsmoker/OC use (n = 57) Smoker/OC use (n = 17)
T2 aBMD (g/cm2)
 Unadjusted 0.0013 0.014 −0.012
 Adjusteda −0.032* −0.014 −0.017*
2-year change in aBMD (g/cm2)
 Unadjusted −0.035* −0.013 −0.016
 Adjusteda −0.06 −0.010 −0.021
aAdjusted for age, physical activity baseline BMD, body weight
*P < 0.05
 Lappe et al. 2008 [241] Secondary analyses of this randomized calcium and vitamin D supplementation trial examined other risk factors for developing stress fractures during basic training. Sex: female
Age: 19 years (17–35 years)
Race: not specified
Location: USA
Years 2001–2006
5201 Stress fracture Risk of fracture was 41 % higher in women with history of smoking when adjusted for treatment group, P = 0.0075
Odds ratio for fracture was 1.32 (0.99–1.75) in women with history of smoking when adjusted for treatment, amenorrhea, high exercise, Depo Provera use, age, and running speed.
 Korkor et al. 2009 [231] This 4-year prospective study assessed the relationship between smoking and alcohol intake and bone mass. Students in 9th grade were recruited. Number of cig smoked per day reported in the 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grades. Subjects classified as any smoking over 4 years vs not Sex: 37 males, 72 females
Age: 14–19 years at enrollment
Race: white 83 %, Asian 1 %, Hispanic 4 %, unknown 12 %
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Year(s): 2000–2003
109 Peripheral DXA Simple model, any smokinga Adjusted model, any alcohol or smokingb
Heel aBMD in 12th grade (g/cm2) −0.0249, P = 0.29 −0.0281, P = 0.05
−4.3 % −4.8 %
aAny smoking over the 4-year study (yes, n = 8; no, n = 101)
bAdjusted for sex baseline aBMD dairy intake
Large overlap in smoking and alcohol use. Any smoking or alcohol combined (N = 14) was associated with a −0.028-g/cm2 lower aBMD.
 Lucas et al. 2012 [235] This prospective study quantified the association between early initiation of smoking and alcohol intake and forearm BMD in early and late adolescence. Smoking reported at age 13 and 17 years and classified as: tried but not currently smoking, smokes but not daily or smokes daily Sex: female
Age: 13 years and 17 years
Race: not specified
Location: Portugal
Year(s): 2003–2007
713 Peripheral DXA Smoking at age 13 years vs never smoked (n = 523)
Distal radius aBMD Tried, not currently smoking (n = 165) Smokes (n = 24) P value
At age 13 years 1.1 % −0.6 % 0.410
At age 17 years −2.3 % −0.7 % 0.068
Smoking at age 17 years vs never (n = 390)
Tried, not currently (n = 224) Smokes, not daily (n = 33) Smokes, daily (n = 72) P value
At age 17 years −2.3 % −3.2 % −0.7 % 0.438
Ever smoked in adolescence vs never smoked (n = 353)
At age 17 years Tried 13 years but before 17 years (n = 167) Tried before 13 years (n = 192) P value
0.4 % −1.8 % 0.103
Adjusted for menarche age, alcohol intake, sports, and BMI
 Dorn et al. 2013 [233] This 3-year prospective study of girls examined bone accrual according to smoking, alcohol intake, depression, and anxiety. Smoking measured every 3 months and coded as cigarettes smoked in last 30 days: 0, 1–2 days, 3–5 days, 6–9, 10–19 days, 20–29 days, or 30 day Sex: female
Age: 11–17 years
Race: 62 % white, 33 % black, 5 % other
Location: Ohio, USA
Year(s): 2003–2010
262 DXA
Total body BMC (g)
Spine aBMD (g/cm2)
Hip aBMD (g/cm2)
No significant main effect or age × smoking interaction on total body
Significant age × smoking interaction for spine and hip aBMD. As smoking increased, the rate of bone accrual decreased as girls got older.
Regression models adjusted for race, puberty stage, weight, height, and contraceptive use
Cross-sectional studies
 Elgan et al. 2002 [237] This cross-sectional study conducted in nursing students measured lifestyle and physiologic factors. Smoking was measured by questionnaire and dichotomized as yes/no. 23 % smoked on a daily basis, 22 % were party smokers, and 55 % were nonsmokers. Sex: female
Age: 16–24 years
Race: not reported
Location: Lund, Sweden
Year(s): 1999
218 Peripheral DXA
Heel aBMD (g/cm2)
Smoking status not significantly associated with aBMD in bivariate analyses. Data not shown
Smoking not significant (P = 0.48) in regression models adjusting for age, weight, physical activity, and hormonal age
 Afghani et al. 2003 [336] A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a smoking cessation trial. Analyses investigated the role of body composition, physical activity, menarche, smoking, and second-hand smoke on regional bone mass among Asian adolescents living in Wuhan, China. Smoking questions assessed if subjects “smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their life?” and “have smoked in last 30 day.” Smoking was reclassified for analyses as smoking yes/no. Sex: male and female
Age: 12–16 years, 14.5 ± 0.5
Race: Asian
Location: Wuhan, China
Year(s): not reported
466 Peripheral DXA Correlation with smoking (yes/no)a P value Multivariable modelsb
Boys (n = 300)
 Forearm BMC 0.05 NS NS
 Forearm aBMD 0.04 NS
 Heel BMC 0.05 NS NS
 Heel aBMD 0.00 NS
Girls (n = 166)
 Forearm BMC 0.15 <0.05 NS
 Forearm aBMD 0.04 NS
 Heel BMC 0.08 NS NS
 Heel aBMD 0.09 NS
aUnclear how correlation derived given that smoking was a dichotomous variable
bAdjusting for age, height, lean mass, fat mass, team sports participation, menarche, and passive smoking
Low level of smoking and inconsistent report of smoking in the sample limits conclusions. 38 % of girls and 14 % of boys inconsistently answered smoking questions. Among smokers, 58 % of girls and 51 % of boys smoked ≤1 cigarette in last 30 days.
 Kyriazopoulos et al. 2006 [236] This cross-sectional study evaluated the influence of current dietary factors (calcium, proteins, alcohol, coffee, and tea intake), exercise, smoking, and sunlight on forearm bone mass in young Greek men. Smoking coded as daily smoking (58.6 %) or no Sex: male
Age: 18–30 years, mean 22 years
Race: not reported
Location: Greece
Year(s): not reported
300 Peripheral DXA
Distal Radius BMC
Distal radius aBMD
Ultradistal radius aBMD
There was no association between daily smoking (58.6 % of sample) and bone measures with and without adjustment for height, weight, calcium intake, sunlight exposure, exercise, and work. Data not shown
 Lorentzon et al. 2007 [239] The GOOD study is a cross-sectional study involving a random selection of males in Gothenburg. Bone mass, density, and geometry measured by DXA and pQCT. Smoking quantified as cigarettes/day and duration. For analyses, subjects were classified as smokers ≥1 cig/day vs not. Sex: male
Age: 18–20 years
Race: not reported
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Year(s): not reported
1063 Difference between smoked ≥1 cigarette/daya vs not
Unadjusted P value Adjustedb P value
DXA
 Total body aBMD −2.1 % <0.01 −1.8 % 0.01
 Spine aBMD −4.3 % <0.001 −3.3 % <0.01
 Femoral neck aBMD −5.3 % <0.001 −3.9 % <0.01
 Trochanter aBMD −6.6 % <0.001 −5.0 % <0.01
pQCT
 Tibia
  Cortical vBMD 0.0 % 0.91 NS
  Cortical thickness −4.5 % <0.001 −4.0 % <0.001
  Periosteal circumference 0.0 % 0.97 NS
  Endosteal circumference 2.5 % <0.05 2.7 % 0.01
  Trabecular vBMD −4.2 % <0.01 −3.8 % <0.01
Radius
 Cortical vBMD −0.1 % 0.55 NS
 Cortical thickness −2.8 % <0.01 −2.9 % <0.01
 Periosteal circumference 0.7 % 0.32 NS
 Endosteal circumference 3.3 % 0.02 4.5 % <0.01
 Trabecular vBMD −2.7 % 0.16 NS
aSmokers consumed 9.3 ± 6.3 cig/day. Mean duration of smoking 4.1 ± 2.1 years. Smokers less active than nonsmokers
bAdjusted for calcium intake, physical activity, age, height, and weight. Smokers had reduced BMD due to smaller cortical thickness greater endosteal circumference
 Dorn et al. 2011 [232] This cross-sectional analysis of data examined how bone mass and density varied according to smoking, alcohol intake, depression, and anxiety. Smoking ever in their life coded as never (n = 104), 1 puff to 2 cig (n = 54), and 3–99 cig (n = 51), >100 cig/day (n = 52) Sex: female
Age: 11–17 years
Race: 62 % white
33 % black, 5 % other
Location: Ohio, USA
Year(s): 2003–2007
261 DXA
 Total body BMC (g) No significant differences among smoking groups
 Spine aBMD (g/cm2) No significant differences among smoking groups
 Total hip aBMD (g/cm2) 1 puff to 2 cig group 6.5 % greater than >100 cig group, P < 0.05
 Femoral neck aBMD (g/cm2) 1 puff to 2 cig group 6.0 % greater than >100 cig group, P < 0.05
Analyses adjusted for age, weight, height, race, and maturational stage.
Significant interactions between alcohol and tobacco use, and depression symptoms on bone outcomes. Stronger negative association between depressive symptoms and total body BMC among individuals who smoked and used alcohol.
 Eleftheriou et al. 2013 [238] A cross-sectional study evaluating the association of smoking, alcohol consumption, and prior exercise with lower limb bone volume, composition, and structure by MRI and DXA in a large cohort of healthy Caucasian males. Smoking status coded as nonsmoker, ex-smoker (>6 months), recent ex-smoker (≤6 months), or current smoker Sex: male
Age: mean 19.9 years
Race: Caucasian
Location: UK
Year(s): not reported
651 Differencea between smoking status vs nonsmoker (n = 329)
Ex-smoker >6 months (n = 41) Recent ex-smoker ≤ 6 months (n = 35) Current smoker (n = 244) P value
DXA
 Total hip aBMD −5.0 % −6.0 % −4.7 % 0.0001
 Femoral neck aBMD −5.9 % −5.3 % −4.0 % 0.001
MRI
 Periosteal volume −5.0 % −4.3 % −0.4 % 0.004
 Endosteal volume NS, data not shown
 Cortical volume NS, data not shown
aAdjusted for height weight, alcohol intake, and weight-bearing activity
 Winther et al. 2014 [234] This cross-sectional population-based study compared BMD levels of Norwegian adolescents with lifestyle factors. Smoking was classified as daily smoking, sometimes smokes, or never smokes. Sex: male and female
Age: 15–17 years
Race:
Location: Norway
Year(s): 2010–2011
835 Difference between smokinga vs not
Age adjusted Multivariable adjusteda
DXA Beta P value Beta P value
Males (n = 492)
 Total hip aBMD (g/cm2) −0.039 0.012 0.029 0.037
 Femoral neck aBMD (g/cm2) −0.025 0.116
Females: (n = 469)
 Total hip aBMD (g/cm2) −0.026 0.074
 Femoral neck aBMD (g/cm2) −0.031 0.031
aIncludes daily smoking (5.5 % of girls and 3.8 % of boys) and sometimes smokes (15.9 % girls, 20.2 % of boys) vs never smokes (76.6 % of girls and 74.2 % of boys)
bAdjusted for age, BMI, height, sexual maturation, physical activity, alcohol intake, diseases, and medications known to affect bone and hormonal contraceptives

aBMD areal bone mineral density, BMC bone mineral content, BMD bone mineral density, cig cigarette, DXA dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, GOOD Gothenburg osteoporosis and obesity determinants, OC oral contraceptive, pQCT peripheral quantitative computed tomography