Table 5.
Calcium and exercise and bone health in children and adolescents
Reference | Study description | Population description | Number of subjects | End points | Results | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molgaard et al. 2001 [245] | 1-year prospective observational study to determine effects of dietary calcium and physical activity on bone changes. | Sex: 140 boys, 192 girls Age: 5–19 years at baseline Race: Caucasian Location: Copenhagen, Denmark |
332 | Correlation with calcium intake, r | Correlation with physical activity, r | |
Whole bone area gain adjusted for height and weight | 0.03, girls | 0.28 | ||||
−0.34, boys | 0.28 | |||||
Total body BMC gain adjusted for bone area, height, and weight | 0.21, girls | −0.06 | ||||
0.34, boys | −0.04 | |||||
Carter et al. 2001 [171] | Cross-sectional study to investigate the relationship between calcium intake and BMC. | Sex: 108 boys and 119 girls Mean age: 13 years Race: Primarily Caucasian Location: Saskatoon Canada |
227 | Total body BMC | No association | |
Lumbar spine BMC | No association | |||||
Lloyd et al. 2000 [174] | 6-year prospective study to determine effects of dietary calcium and physical activity on bone changes | Sex: girls Age: 12–18 years at baseline Race: Caucasian Location: Pennsylvania |
81 | Total body BMC gain | NS | |
Total body BMD gain | NS | |||||
Femoral neck BMDa | r = 0.42 with exercise | |||||
Lappe et al. 2014 [172] | 6-year prospective study of calcium intake and physical activity on bone accrual | Sex: boys and girls Age: 5–16 years at baseline Race: white, black, Asian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Location: 5 sites in the USA |
1743 | Mixed-model analyses | ||
Total body BMC gaina | Associated with physical activity in nonblacks | |||||
Spine BMC gaina | Associated with physical activity in blacks and nonblack males | |||||
Total hip BMC gaina | Associated with calcium in nonblack females | |||||
Adjusted for changes in height, age, and baseline BMC | Associated with physical activity in nonblacks and black males |
BMC bone mineral content, BMD bone mineral density, NS not significant
aSignificantly greater than the control