Table 2.
Adjusted relative risks for participation with self-sampling in the brush device group in comparison to the lavage device group
RR | 95 % CI | |
---|---|---|
Totala | 1.1 | 0,91–1,32 |
Age groupb | ||
< =39 | 1.1 | 0,77–1,58 |
40–49 | 1.1 | 0,76–1,54 |
50–59 | 1.28 | 0,93–1,76 |
60–69 | 0.7 | 0,38–1,29 |
Mother tonguec | ||
Finnish/Swedish | 1.1 | 0,91–1,33 |
Other | 0.95 | 0,28–3,20 |
Education leveld | ||
Primary | 1.59 | 0,65–3,91 |
Secondary | 1.05 | 0,80–1,39 |
Tertiary | 1.11 | 0,85–1,44 |
Marital statuse | ||
Unmarried | 1.17 | 0,84–1,64 |
Married/Widowed | 1.08 | 0,85–1,38 |
Divorced | 1.21 | 0,72–2,06 |
Municipality typef | ||
Urban | 1.15 | 0,89–1,50 |
Semi-urban | 1.06 | 0,74–1,53 |
Rural | 1.04 | 0,71–1,53 |
In the lavage group four women and in the brush-group eight women with unknown marital status are excluded from the analysis. The women participating with a Pap smear after the self-sampling offer are not included as self-sampling participants in this analysis
aAdjusted for age, mother tongue, education level, marital status and municipality type
bAdjusted for mother tongue, education level, marital status and municipality type
cAdjusted for age, education level, marital status and municipality type
dAdjusted for age, mother tongue, marital status and municipality type
eAdjusted for age, mother tongue, education level and municipality type
fAdjusted for age, mother tongue, education level and marital status