Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 15;12(3):e1005939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005939

Table 1. Variation in mtCN estimates from different methods.

Method Tissue Sample size Mean SD chromosomes SD replicates
shotgun HiSeq BL 148 257 0.025 0.085
shotgun HiSeq SM 137 2873 0.032 0.032
shotgun HiSeq LIV 150 7023 0.026
shotgun HiSeq MM 151 2788 0.026
shotgun MiSeq BL 26 212 0.028 0.103
shotgun MiSeq SM 25 2885 0.022 0.044
capture-enrichment BL 139 159348 0.062  
capture-enrichment SM 150 404773 0.058  
capture-enrichment LIV 142 360418 0.063  
capture-enrichment MM 152 591684 0.063  
capture-enrichment CEL 151 393972 0.087  
capture-enrichment CER 150 387283 0.080  
capture-enrichment CO 150 394297 0.077  
capture-enrichment KI 149 725243 0.066  
capture-enrichment LI 47 217524 0.066  
capture-enrichment OV 149 419861 0.103  
capture-enrichment SI 152 254660 0.058  
capture-enrichment SK 149 408534 0.060  
ddPCR BL 150 260   0.134
ddPCR SM 151 2744   0.101

For each combination of method and tissue, the sample size and mean mtCN estimate across individuals are given. For the sequence-based methods, the mean SD across chromosomes is given (SD-chromosomes); for the shotgun (re-sequencing of the same library and after preparation of new libraries) and ddPCR data from BL and SM tissue the mean SD across replicates for all individuals is given (SD-replicates). All SD values were normalized by the mean mtCN for each tissue.