Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 Sep 2;21(8):610–621. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715000715

Table 2.

Association between handedness and neurodevelopmental outcomes by birth group at 7 years of age

VPT (n = 175) Term Control (n = 69)
Outcome measure b (95% CI)^ p ^ b (95% CI)^ p ^ p ^ *



Full scale IQ 0.08 (−0.05, 0.23) 0.22 0.09 (−0.21, 0.38) 0.55 0.10
Reading 0.26 (0.05, 0.47) 0.02 −0.17 (−0.51, 0.18) 0.34 0.04
Spelling 0.26 (0.08, 0.44) 0.005 −0.15 (−0.48, 0.19) 0.38 0.04
Mathematics 0.22 (0.02, 0.42) 0.03 0.05 (−0.24, 0.33) 0.74 0.34
Language 0.19 (−0.01, 0.39) 0.06 −0.01 (−0.27, 0.25) 0.95 0.24
Global motor ability 0.01 (−0.05, 0.02) 0.49 0.05 (−0.02, 0.13) 0.17 0.13
Fine motor skills 0.01 (−0.02, 0.04) 0.53 0.01 (−0.06, 0.08) 0.71 0.94
Gross motor skills 0.01 (−0.06, 0.03) 0.51 0.04 (−0.07, 0.16) 0.46 0.36
Working Memory 0.27 (0.06, 0.49) 0.01 0.06 (−0.38, 0.52) 0.78 0.40
Behavior difficulty 0.01 (−0.08, 0.05) 0.69 0.08 (−0.04, 0.19) 0.20 0.19
^

Adjusted for social risk at age 7 years, corrected age at assessment and parental left-handedness

b = regression coefficient; a positive value indicates that a lower score is associated with stronger NRH. If the regression is statistically significant, the 95% CI will not contain 0.

*

p value for the interaction between birth group and handedness