Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Neurosci. 2016 Feb 15;130(2):206–211. doi: 10.1037/bne0000133

Table 1.

Freezing responses of observers and target mice 24-h post-conditioning as a function of housing condition and sex.

Housing-type Conditioning-type Sex % freezing
isolate direct M 67.9±2.23
social direct M 63.9±3.40
isolate direct F 53.0±2.88
social direct F 70.0±2.49***
isolate vicarious M 7.8±1.74
social vicarious M 11.5±1.33
isolate vicarious F 6.2±1.16
social vicarious F 18.8±2.26***

Freezing responses of directly and vicariously conditioned B6 mice are displayed relative to their housing context and sex. Data are presented as the mean ± std. error. Asterisks represent significant orthogonal contrasts comparing isolate versus social housing contexts-by-sex for each type of conditioning.

***

P<0.001.