Table. Neuropsychological Testinga.
| Test | Scoreb | Interpretationc |
|---|---|---|
| Intellectual functioning | ||
| WAIS-III/7 | ||
| Estimated visual IQ | 102 | Average |
| Estimated performance IQ | 100 | Average |
| Estimated full-scale IQ | 101 | Average |
| WTAR | 103 | Average |
| Memory | ||
| WMS-III | ||
| Logical memory I | 8 | Low average |
| Logical memory II | 8 | Low average |
| CVLT-II | ||
| Total trials 1-5 | 22 | Impaired |
| Trial 1 | 4 | Borderline |
| Trial 5 | 4 | Impaired |
| Short-delay free recall | 5 | Impaired |
| Short-delay cued recall | 5 | Impaired |
| Long-delay free recall | 4 | Impaired |
| Long-delay cued recall | 5 | Impaired |
| BVMT-R | ||
| Trial 1 | 8 | Average |
| Trial 2 | 10 | Average |
| Trial 3 | 11 | Average |
| Delayed recall | 11 | Average |
| Language | ||
| BNT-2 | 47 | Impaired |
| D-KEFS letter fluency | 26 | Low average |
| D-KEFS category fluency | 32 | Average |
| Attention/executive functioning | ||
| TMT | ||
| Part A speed (errors) | 14 s(0) | High average |
| Part B speed (errors) | 84 s(1) | Impaired |
| Symbol digit modalities test | ||
| Written | 36 | Impaired |
| Oral | 57 | Low average |
| Stroop color and word test | ||
| Word score | 46 | Average |
| Color score | 46 | Average |
| Color-word score | 51 | Average |
| Interference | 53 | Average |
| Visuospatial | ||
| Rey figure copy | 8 | Low average |
| BVMT-R copy | 12 | Within expectation |
| Judgment of line orientation | 28 | High average |
Abbreviations: BNT, Boston Naming Test; BVMT-R, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised; CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test; D-KEFS, Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System; TMT, Trail Making Test; WAIS, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; WMS, Wechsler Memory Scale; WTAR, Wechsler Test of Adult Reading.
Summary: Intelligence was average and reading ability was commensurate. Visuospatial abilities were average. There were deficits in verbal episodic encoding, although verbal episodic retrieval and visual memory were intact. There were deficits in set-shifting and processing speed. Selective attention was intact. There were deficits in naming. Letter and category fluency were intact.
All scores are raw, unless otherwise indicated.
Interpretations are based on normative data accounting for age and education level. Percentile conversions are as follows: very superior >98%; superior, 91%-97%; high average, 75%-90%; average, 25%-74%; low average, 9%-24%; borderline, 2%-8%; and impaired <2%.