Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 29;33(1):42–46. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2015.48039

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients re-operated for recurrent BCCs of the eyelids

Gender Age [years] Topographic location Histopathology of primary lesion Histopathology of secondary lesion IP of primary lesion [%] IP of secondary lesion [%] Time span to confirmed recurrence [months] Postoperative period free from recurrences [years]
M 78 Medial canthus RE BCC with trichilemmal differentiation 8 26 16 2
F 70 Le RE 8 11 8 1
M 71 Medial canthus LE 5 15 13 3
F 74 Le LE 6 13 9 2
M 73 Medial canthus LE 10 29 18 3
F 61 Le LE BCC – nodular type 7 14 7 3
F 54 Lateral canthus RE 20 13 8 1
F 65 Medial canthus RE 10 18 18 1
F 60 Medial canthus LE 12 21 16 2
M 70 Medial canthus RE 9 15 14 3
M 69 Medial canthus LE 14 28 20 3
F 79 Medial canthus LE BCC – nodular-infiltrating type 18 25 30 2
F 74 Medial canthus RE 15 27 15 3
F 73 Lateral canthus LE BCC – infiltrating type 1 12 23 9
M 70 Le RE 5 20 18 5
F 73 Medial canthus LE BCC – superficial type BCC – nodular type 6 39 21 3
F 68 Le LE 10 48 15 3
M 72 Le LE BCC – nodular type BCC – infiltrating type 7 17 5.5 4
M 75 Le RE 10 24 7 4

IP – proliferation index, M – male, F – female, Le – lower eyelid, RE – right eye, LE – left eye.