Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2016 Mar 16;6:23305. doi: 10.1038/srep23305

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PMC Copyright notice

Abnormal Bout Rhythmic Structure in Foxp2+/− Song. (a) Example spectrograms of typical rhythmic structure in adult WT song (top) and adult Foxp2+/− song (bottom). Short syllables, long syllables, group boundaries, and bout boundaries are labelled as S, L, g, and b, respectively. (b,c) Average conditional transition probabilities of starting groups and bouts on either long or short syllables (left side of panel), ending groups and bouts on either short or long syllables (right side of panel), and producing short or long syllables given the production of a short or long syllable (center of panel) in (b) adult WT and (c) adult Foxp2+/− (SR > 90) song. Arrow weights indicate the magnitude of a transition’s probability. Significant differences in between genotypes are bolded. (d,e) Average Preference Strengths for the transitions in (b,c) in (d) adult WT and (e) adult Foxp2+/− (SR > 90) mice. Arrow weights indicate the magnitude of a transition’s Preference Strength. Significance is reported as follows: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005; ****p < 0.0001; ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s Correction for multiple comparisons. Additional statistical details are presented in Supplementary Table S1.