Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 16;14:75. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0832-x

Table 2.

Association of B2M expression with the clinicopathological features of patients with EOC

Clinicopathological features n B2M expression P value
Positive (%) Negative (%)
Age at diagnosis
 ≤45 8 6 (75.00) 2 (25.00) >0.999
 >45 24 19 (79.17) 5 (20.83)
Primary tumour size
 ≤2 cm 4 4 (100.00) 0 (0.00) 0.552
 >2 cm 28 21 (75.00) 7 (25.00)
Multifocal tumours
 Yes 15 13 (86.67) 2 (13.33) 0.402
 No 17 12 (70.59) 5 (29.41)
LN metastasis
 Yes 4 3 (75.00) 1 (25.00) >0.999
 No 28 22 (78.57) 6 (21.43)
FIGO stage
 I 17 12 (70.59) 5 (29.41) 0.207
 II 7 5 (71.43) 2 (28.57)
 III 8 8 (100.00) 0 (0.00)

The expression of B2M proteins was detected by immunohistochemistry. For comparison of B2M expression associated with age, primary tumour size, multifocal, LN metastasis, and clinical stages, Fisher’s exact test was applied

EOC epithelial ovarian cancer; n number of cases; Positive positive expression; Negative negative expression; LN lymph node