Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2015 Oct 23;25(4):1098–1109. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0307-3

Table 4.

Mean differences of low and high self-compassion on physiological stress reactivity to TSST during the preparatory phase, speech, and math tasks in a sample of male and female adolescents age 13–18 (n = 28)

Mean (SD) [Median]
t statistic [z statistic] Hedge’s g (95% CI)
LSC (n = 12) HSC (n = 16)
ΔSBP (prep) 15.34 (6.16) 10.14 (8.75) 1.76 0.65 [−0.10, 1.40]
ΔSBP (speech) 25.74 (8.52) 18.66 (10.53) 1.91 0.71 [−0.04, 1.46]
ΔSBP (math) 20.10 (8.93) 16.26 (11.40) 0.96 0.36 [−0.38, 1.09]
ΔDBP (prep) 9.80 (3.91) 7.79 (6.20) 0.98 0.41 [−0.32, 1.15]
ΔDBP (speech) 14.97 (5.08) [13.67] 14.29 (5.64) [12.64] 0.47 [0.53] 0.17 [−0.55, 0.90]
ΔDBP (math) 12.69 (4.84) 11.12 (6.30) 0.72 0.27 [−0.46, 1.00]
ΔHR (prep) 17.98 (13.39) [14.14] 14.77 (11.85) [12.05] 0.32 [0.50] 0.13 [−0.64, 0.88]
ΔHR (speech) 17.77 (14.63) [9.57] 17.98 (15.55) [15.19] 0.04 [−0.325] 0.01 [−0.71, 0.74]
ΔHR (math) 19.41 (14.78) [16.29] 16.92 (15.25) [12.12] 0.38 [0.418] 0.14 [−0.59, 0.87]
Cortisol (AUCi) 1.16 (2.34) [0.05] 0.43 (1.07) [0.12] 0.31 [0.51] 0.12 [−0.61, 0.84]
RSA (prep-baseline) −0.78 (0.61) [−0.79] −0.63 (1.01) [−0.40] −0.45 [−1.11] 0.17 [−1.04, 0.71]
RSA (recovery-prep) 0.68 (0.55) [0.51] 0.55 (0.86) [0.30] −0.47 [0.98] 0.17 [−0.63, 0.98]
RSA (recovery-baseline) −0.10 (0.39) [−0.23] −0.08 (0.49) [−0.10] −0.09 [0.23] 0.03 [−0.80, 0.74]

Note. LSC–low self-compassion group, HSC–high self-compassion group; TSST-Trier Social Stress Test; ΔSBP-change in systolic blood pressure; ΔDBP-change in diastolic blood pressure; ΔHR-change in heart rate; AUCi-area under the curve with respect to increase; RSA-Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (measure of heart rate variability); prep-preparatory phase of the Trier; . Heart rate variables were square-root transformed and cortisol AUCi and the diastolic blood pressure with the speech task were log-transformed to achieve normality prior to calculation of the t statistic and Hedge’s g. Where variable distributions were non-normal, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to confirm results. Effect sizes for the RSA variables are reported with bootstrapped confidence intervals.