Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Jul 2;98(2 Pt 2):310–320. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.05.009

Table 4.

Multivariate associations of loss dimensions and pupillary motility dimensions. A., using all five temporal factors to explain variance in each self-report factor, B., using all three self-report factors to explain variance in each temporal factor, with C. reporting the significance of beta weights from each of the regressions in A and B.

A. Self-Report factors explained by all temporal factors
Depressive Severity: R2 = 0.19 F(83,77)=3.00 p=0.01
Rumination: R2 = 0.07 F(83,77)=0.96 p=0.46
Cognition: R2 = 0.25 F(83,77)=4.19 p<0.005
B. Temporal factors predicted from all self-report factors

Prep R2 = 0.01 F(83,80)=0.17 p=0.91
Word R2 = 0.07 F(83,80)=2.08 p=0.11
Late Word R2 = 0.06 F(83,80)=1.61 p=0.19
Task switch Digits R2 =0.12 F(83,80)=3.72 p=0.01
Probe Comparison R2 = 0.14 F(83,80)=4.38 p=0.01
Post Comparison R2 = 0.14 F(83,80)=4.46 p=0.01
C. Significance of betas for each factor in models for A,B.

Depressive Severity 0.5 0.8 0.06 0.01 0.42 0.02
Rumination 0.35 0.53 0.16 0.08 0.19 0.73
Cognition 0.58 0.91 0.18 0.26 0.01 <0.005
Preparation Word Late Word Switch/Digits Probe Comparison Post Comparison
Preparation 0.74 0.9 0.54
Word 0.51 0.97 0.02
Late Word 0.63 0.63 0.05
Switch/Digits <0.005 0.07 0.13
Probe Comparison 0.05 0.83 <0.005
Post Comparison 0.01 0.49 0.09
Depressive Severity Rumination Cognition