Table 5. Hazard ratios comparing under-5 mortality and household wealth, in Rufiji and Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania, 2000–2011.
Period | Household’s wealth quintile, HR (95% CI) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
First vs fifth | Second vs fifth | Third vs fifth | Fourth vs fifth | |
Ifakara | ||||
2000–2001 | 1.30 (1.09–1.55) | 1.11 (1.01–1.22) | 1.02 (0.96–1.08) | 1.01 (0.96–1.06) |
2002–2003 | 1.27 (1.11–1.44) | 1.08 (1.01–1.15) | 1.02 (0.97–1.06) | 1.01 (0.97–1.04) |
2004–2005 | 1.24 (1.11–1.37) | 1.04 (0.99–1.10) | 1.01 (0.97–1.04) | 1.01 (0.98–1.04) |
2006–2007 | 1.21 (1.08–1.35) | 1.01 (0.96–1.07) | 1.00 (0.96–1.04) | 1.01 (0.98–1.04) |
2008–2009 | 1.18 (1.02–1.36) | 0.98 (0.91–1.05) | 0.99 (0.95–1.04) | 1.01 (0.97–1.04) |
2010–2011 | 1.15 (0.95–1.39) | 0.95 (0.86–1.05) | 0.99 (0.93–1.05) | 1.01 (0.96–1.06) |
Rufiji | ||||
2000–2001 | 1.20 (0.99–1.47) | 1.00 (0.90–1.10) | 0.95 (0.89–1.01) | 0.99 (0.94–1.04) |
2002–2003 | 1.25 (1.08–1.45) | 1.04 (0.96–1.12) | 0.98 (0.93–1.03) | 1.01 (0.97–1.05) |
2004–2005 | 1.31 (1.16–1.48) | 1.08 (1.01–1.15) | 1.02 (0.98–1.06) | 1.03 (1.00–1.06) |
2006–2007 | 1.36 (1.18–1.56) | 1.12 (1.05–1.20) | 1.05 (1.01–1.10) | 1.05 (1.01–1.08) |
2008–2009 | 1.42 (1.18–1.70) | 1.16 (1.06–1.27) | 1.09 (1.03–1.16) | 1.06 (1.02–1.11) |
2010–2011 | 1.48 (1.15–1.89) | 1.21 (1.07–1.36) | 1.13 (1.05–1.22) | 1.08 (1.02–1.15) |
All | ||||
2000–2001 | 1.27 (1.12–1.45) | 1.06 (0.99–1.13) | 0.99 (0.95–1.04) | 1.00 (0.97–1.03) |
2002–2003 | 1.28 (1.16–1.41) | 1.06 (1.01–1.11) | 1.00 (0.97–1.04) | 1.01 (0.98–1.03) |
2004–2005 | 1.28 (1.19–1.39) | 1.06 (1.01–1.10) | 1.01 (0.99–1.04) | 1.02 (0.99–1.04) |
2006–2007 | 1.29 (1.18–1.40) | 1.06 (1.01–1.10) | 1.02 (1.00–1.05) | 1.02 (1.00–1.04) |
2008–2009 | 1.29 (1.15–1.45) | 1.06 (1.00–1.12) | 1.04 (1.00–1.08) | 1.03 (1.00–1.06) |
2010–2011 | 1.30 (1.12–1.51) | 1.06 (0.98–1.14) | 1.05 (1.00–1.10) | 1.04 (1.00–1.08) |
CI: confidence interval; HR: Hazard ratio.
Note: First quintile represents the poorest and the fifth quintile represents the richest.