Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 5;128(23):3163–3166. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.170265

Table 1.

Assessment of stability, quadriceps circumferences, ROM, and knee function in both groups (group I and group II)

Characteristics n Mean ± SD Range n Mean ± SD Range P
Preoperative Lachman
 Grade 2 4 5
 Grade 3 49 48
Final follow-up Lachman
 – 46 47 0.5
 Grade 1 7 6
Preoperative pivot-shift
 Grade 1 7 6
 Grade 2 46 44
 Grade 3 0 3
Final follow-up pivot-shift
 – 42 40 0.5
 Grade 1 11 13
 Preoperative quadriceps circumference (feet) 2.6 0.8–5.0 2.6 1–4 >0.5
 Postoperative quadriceps circumference (feet) 1.0 0.4–2.0 2.0 1.0–3.5
ROM (°) 136.0 ± 4.5 136 ± 43 >0.5
Preoperative IKDC score (I) 67.3 ± 2.5 61–78 (II) 66.1 ± 3.5 60–74 >0.5
Postoperative IKDC score (I) 87.8 ± 1.6 82–90 (II) 85.6 ± 2.9 81–91
Preoperative Lysholm score (I) 71.9 ± 4.2 69–84 (II) 71.0 ± 3.6 66–83 >0.5
Postoperative Lysholm score (I) 85.2 ± 3.1 80–95 (II) 86.8 ± 2.6 81–90

SD: Standard deviation; IKDC: International Knee Documentation Committee; ROM: Range of motion. The P values of Final follow-up Lachman and Final follow-up pivot-shift stand for improvement ratio.