Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 16;16:272. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2947-7

Table 1.

Participants’ characteristics by sexa

Males Females Total p value*
(N = 5062) (N = 4396) (N = 9518)
%/mean (SD) %/mean (SD) %/mean (SD)
School grade
 Secondary 1 24.71 23.23 23.98 0.043
 Secondary 2 24.71 24.25 24.51
 Secondary 3 26.49 26.00 26.31
 Secondary 4 24.08 26.52 25.20
Father’s education level
 Junior secondary school or below 26.51 29.50 27.83 <0.001
 Senior secondary school or matriculation 37.34 39.04 38.22
 University or college or above 18.25 14.70 16.57
 Missing 17.90 16.77 17.38
Mother’s education level
 Junior secondary school or below 27.12 30.48 28.66 <0.001
 Senior secondary school or matriculation 40.34 43.06 41.67
 University or college or above 15.27 11.03 13.25
 Missing 17.27 15.42 16.42
Living arrangement with parents
 Living with both parents 82.83 82.50 82.70 0.143
 Living with the mother only 9.25 9.92 9.55
 Living with the father only 3.14 2.82 2.99
 Living with none of the parents 2.67 3.34 2.97
 Missing 2.11 1.39 1.79
Father’s age (mean ± SD) 46.95 ± 6.78 47.08 ± 6.59 47.02 ± 6.68 0.428
Whether born in HK/length of residency
 Yes, born in HK 79.89 77.05 78.58 <0.001
 No, stayed in HK ≥7 years 11.81 13.33 12.53
 No, stayed in HK <7 years 5.55 7.48 6.43
 No, can’t remember when came to HK 2.00 1.66 1.84
 Missing 0.75 0.48 0.62
HBM constructs
 Perceived Susceptibility to IA 2.36 ± 1.08 2.35 ± 1.00 2.36 ± 1.04 0.558
 Perceived Severity of IA 3.29 ± 1.26 3.52 ± 1.12 3.40 ± 1.20 <0.001
 Perceived Barriers (reducing use) 10.39 ± 3.99 10.81 ± 3.82 10.59 ± 3.92 <0.001
 Perceived Social Benefits (Internet use) 13.70 ± 4.20 13.40 ± 3.99 13.57 ± 4.11 <0.001
 Cue to Action Scale (reducing use) 5.46 ± 2.05 4.91 ± 1.95 5.21 ± 2.03 <0.001
 Perceived Self-efficacy (reducing use) 7.08 ± 2.04 7.30 ± 1.90 7.18 ± 1.98 <0.001
Perceived number of peers with IA (PNPIA)
 Nil 16.69 18.08 17.35 <0.001
 Only a few 41.21 52.30 46.34
 Quite a number 29.26 24.57 27.10
 A large number 12.84 5.05 9.21

Cases with missing information for gender were excluded from analysis (n = 60)

2 test or 2-sample t-test

aFigures for the variable on school attended by participants (18 schools) were not listed in this table