Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Sep 23;44(3):279–287. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0058-5

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics, stratified by programming at implant

Nominal
(n=1559)
AV adjusted
(n=2294)
p value
(vs. nominal)
VV adjusted
(n=604)
p value
(vs. nominal)
AV and VV adjusted
(n=852)
p value
(vs. nominal)
Age 69.8 (11.3) 68.8 (11.1) 0.007 69.8 (11.8) 0.997 68.8 (11.5) 0.030
Male 73.7 % 69.9 % 0.006 73.8 % 0.964 71.0 % 0.133
DFT at implant 77.6 % 83.8 % <0.0001 80.3 % 0.166 81.9 % 0.011
  Last shock energy (J) 19.97 (6.31) 19.43 (6.35) 0.011 19.97 (5.98) 0.956 19.45 (5.55) 0.069
Bradycardia programming
  DDD 52.5 % 59.8 % <0.0001 48.2 % 0.065 59.0 % 0.001
  DDDR 47.5 % 40.2 % <0.0001 51.8 % 0.065 41.0 % 0.001
  LRL 61.5 (7.3) 59.9 (7.5) <0.0001 60.2 (9.4) 0.000 58.7 (8.9) <0.0001
Tachyarrhythmia programming
  1 therapy zone 16.5 % 15.9 % 0.580 8.9 % <0.0001 11.4 % 0.0004
  2 therapy zones 69.7 % 71.2 % 0.269 75.3 % 0.007 75.7 % 0.001
  3 therapy zones 13.8 % 12.9 % 0.377 15.7 % 0.232 12.9 % 0.534
  VT detection rate 175 (15) 176 (14) 0.224 176 (14) 0.564 175 (14) 0.290
  VF detection rate 207 (16) 207 (16) 0.379 209 (15) 0.009 207 (16) 0.736
  ATP therapy “on” in VT zone/s 94.3 % 95.2 % 0.227 95.9 % 0.134 96.1 % 0.051

Numbers are % or mean (standard deviation)

AV atrioventricular timing, VV ventricular-to-ventricular timing, DFT defibrillation threshold testing, LRL lower rate limit