Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 24;55(4):755–762. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev426

Table 1.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients affected by knee OA treated with pulsed electromagnetic fields or placebo device

Characteristic All patients (n = 60) PEMF (n = 30) Placebo (n = 30)
Age, mean (s.d.), years 67.7 (10.9) 68.6 (11.9) 66.9 (10)
Gender (female/male) 43/17 21/9 22/8
BMI, mean (s.d.), kg/m2 27.4 (4.3) 27.7 (4.6) 27.1 (4.1)
Disease duration, mean (s.d.), years 12.1 (8.2) 12.4 (9.1) 11.9 (7.4)
Pain score (100 mm VAS), mean (s.d.), mm 65.3 (15.8) 67 (16.6) 63.6 (15.1)
WOMAC total score, mean (s.d.) 132.9 (45.2) 136.6 (49.6) 129.2 (40.8)
SF-36 v2 physical health, mean (s.d.) 52.1 (6.8) 52 (7.4) 52.2 (6.2)
SF-36 v2 mental health, mean (s.d.) 41.1 (5.9) 40.4 (5.8) 41.8 (5.6)
DIP PPT, mean (s.d.) 3.3 (1.3) 3.4 (1.4) 3.3 (1.2)
QDR PPT, mean (s.d.) 12.3 (5.8) 12.4 (6) 12.4 (5.8)
NSAIDs, n (%) 21 (35) 10 (33) 11 (36)
Analgesics, n (%) 26 (43) 12 (40) 14 (46)

PEMF: pulsed electromagnetic fields; PPT: pressure pain threshold; QDR: quadriceps femoris; SF-36 v2: 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form version 2; VAS: visual analog scale.