Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 11;10:431–436. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S102171

Table 1.

Age-related macular degeneration patients treated with Ironing PDT

Case no Age (years) AMD type CNV lesion The reason for choosing PDT BCVA before Ironing PDT BCVA 36 months after Ironing PDT Additional treatments in 36 months follow-up Macular findings 36 months after Ironing PDT
1 75 PCV Peripapillary Cerebrovascular infarction 0.15 0.1 Ironing PDT ×3 Scarring
2 83 PCV Peripapillary Cerebrovascular infarction 0.08 0.05 None Scarring
3 78 PCV Large Cerebrovascular infarction 0.04 0.05 PPV for vitreous hemorrhage Scarring
4 75 tAMD Peripapillary Tachyphylaxis to IVB 0.05 0.1 None Scarring
5 57 tAMD Large Refuse IVR 0.08 0.08 None Scarring
6 77 tAMD Large Cardiovascular disease 0.2 0.08 None Exudative
7 72 tAMD Large Nonresponder to IVR 0.6 0.15 Ironing PDT with IVR ×2 Scarring
8 74 PCV Peripapillary Tachyphylaxis to IVR 0.1 0.1 Ironing PDT with IVR Exudative

Notes: There was no significant difference between the mean logMAR BCVA before treatment and the mean logMAR BCVA after treatment (P=0.809, paired t-test). The logMAR BCVA improved in one eye (12.5%), was maintained in five eyes (62.5%), and deteriorated in two eyes (25.0%).

Abbreviations: BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CNV, choroidal neovascularization; IVB, intravitreous bevacizumab; IVR, intravitreous ranibizumab; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; PCV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; PDT, photodynamic therapy; PPV, pars plana vitrectomy; tAMD, typical age-related macular degeneration.