Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 11;9:1399–1407. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S97520

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of DFS and PFS in 140 patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Variable n DFS
PFS
χ2 P-value χ2 P-value
Age (years)
 <70 81 10.734 0.001 6.828 0.009
 ≥70 59
Sex
 Male 86 0.09 0.765 0.226 0.635
 Female 54
Smoking status
 Yes 40 7.297 0.007 5.924 0.015
 No 100
Hypertension
 Yes 53 0.011 0.917 0.277 0.599
 No 87
Diabetes
 Yes 21 0.011 0.915 0.655 0.418
 No 119
Tumor location
 Left 65 2.106 0.147 0.222 0.637
 Right 75
Tumor necrosis
 Yes 5 1.351 0.245 0.766 0.382
 No 135
Hematuresis
 Yes 107 0.05 0.822 0.054 0.816
 No 33
Hydronephrosis
 Yes 82 0.099 0.753 0.038 0.846
 No 58
Bladder cancer
 Yes 12 0.595 0.441 2.27 0.132
 No 128
Tumor grade
 1/2 67 2.689 0.101 5.64 0.018
 3 73
Pathological T stage
 a-2 88 44.272 0.000 60.893 0.000
 3/4 52
LVI
 Yes 6 11.551 0.001 12.549 0.000
 No 134
NLR
  ≥2.2 63 14.473 0.000 28.806 0.000
 <2.2 77
PLR
  ≥128 47 6.7 0.01 17.071 0.000
 <128 93
LMR
  ≥3.6 77 17.841 0.000 26.635 0.000
 <3.6 63

Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; LMR, lymphocyte–monocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio; PFS, progression-free survival; PLR, platelet–lymphocyte ratio; LVI, lymphovascular invasion.