Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 20;31(20):3282–3289. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv378

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

INLA versus MCMC: simulated data under logistic (top 1), exponential growth (top 2), boombust (top 3) and bottleneck (bottom) population size trajectories. Dotted blue lines show 95% credible intervals given by INLA and shaded regions show 95% credible interval estimated with MCMC samples given by splitHMC