Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: Crim Behav Ment Health. 2015 Dec 10;25(4):273–286. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1976

Table 3.

Model fit indices

Model χ2 df Δχ2 Δdf CFI TLI RMSEA
(90% CI)
SRMR
1. Partner problematic alcohol Use influencing actor IPV perpetration 43.95* 13 0.92 0.84 0.11 (0.07–0.14) 0.07
2. Direct feedback loop for actor-partner problematic alcohol use 42.81* 14 9.84* 1 0.93 0.86 0.10 (0.07–0.13) 0.06
3. Without actor-partner effects 81.73* 16 39.86** 2 0.84 0.73 0.14 (0.11–0.17) 0.09

Note: χ2 = χ-squared statistic; df = degrees of freedom; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis Index; RMSEA = Root-Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardised Root-Mean Squared Residual; IPV = Intimate partner violence. The Δχ2 represents the Satorra–Bentler scaled chi-squared difference, as is recommended for comparisons of models using the maximum likelihood robust estimator. The Δχ2 and Δdf values presented in-line with Model 2 represent the comparison between Model 1 and Model 2; the Δχ2 and Δdf values in-line with Model 3 represent the comparison between Model 2 and Model 3.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.