Table 3.
Model | χ2 | df | Δχ2 | Δdf | CFI | TLI | RMSEA (90% CI) |
SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Partner problematic alcohol Use influencing actor IPV perpetration | 43.95* | 13 | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.11 (0.07–0.14) | 0.07 | ||
2. Direct feedback loop for actor-partner problematic alcohol use | 42.81* | 14 | 9.84* | 1 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.10 (0.07–0.13) | 0.06 |
3. Without actor-partner effects | 81.73* | 16 | 39.86** | 2 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.14 (0.11–0.17) | 0.09 |
Note: χ2 = χ-squared statistic; df = degrees of freedom; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis Index; RMSEA = Root-Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardised Root-Mean Squared Residual; IPV = Intimate partner violence. The Δχ2 represents the Satorra–Bentler scaled chi-squared difference, as is recommended for comparisons of models using the maximum likelihood robust estimator. The Δχ2 and Δdf values presented in-line with Model 2 represent the comparison between Model 1 and Model 2; the Δχ2 and Δdf values in-line with Model 3 represent the comparison between Model 2 and Model 3.
p < .05.
p < .01.