Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 7;120(6):649–656. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00871.2015

Table 1.

Mean resting and exercising ST and PCr resynthesis measures

Resting Exercising Paired-Samples Difference* P
ST, n = 9
    [Pi], mM 3.37 ± 0.18 10.23 ± 1.10 6.9 ± 1.1 <0.001
    T1′, s 4.5 ± 0.1 4.8 ± 0.3 0.3 ± 0.3 0.376
    k′, min−1 2.98 ± 0.35 2.44 ± 0.16 −0.54 ± 0.39 0.204
    VPi-ATP, mM/min 9.8 ± 0.9 25.0 ± 2.9 15.1 ± 3.5 0.003
PCr resynthesis, n = 11
    [PCr], mM 32.9 ± 1.0 23.5 ± 1.2 −9.3 ± 1.2 <0.001
    VATP, mM/min 16.5 ± 1.8 ND

ST, saturation transfer; Pi, inorganic phosphate; T1′, apparent longitudinal relaxation time of Pi in the presence of saturation of the γ-ATP resonance; k′, first-order rate constant; VPi-ATP, rate of Pi→ATP flux; [PCr], concentration of phosphocreatine; VATP, suprabasal oxidative rate of ATP synthesis determined from immediate end of exercise PCr resynthesis; ND, not determined.

Values are means ± SE. Data from volunteers in group B were averaged to provide one value per person to avoid inappropriate weighting.

*

Paired-samples difference (exercising-resting).

Paired-samples t-test to test for significant differences between rest and exercising conditions.

For comparison with exercising, this is 0.0 because VATP reflects suprabasal oxidative ATP synthesis. The net rate of basal oxidative ATP turnover is thought to be approximately 0.5 mM/min (16).