Abstract
This article discusses the overweight/obesity situation among young adults in developing countries. For this target population, obesity prevalence ranges from 2.3 to 12 %, and overweight is 28.8 %, mostly affecting females. Weight is now increasing during this life stage of transition at a higher rate, 1 kg/year, than in developed countries. Maternal factors and early childhood socioeconomic status are associated with BMI in young adults along with changing environmental and behavioural factors in some low and middle income countries, brought about by demographic and socioeconomic transitions. Young adults with ‘normal weight’ obesity need identification using other convenient low cost measures (skin folds or waist circumference) along with BMI. Obesity prevention or management interventions were not identified, but clearly needed to help stem the obesity pandemic. Young people generally give little priority to their future health, so such interventions need to be conducted at some optimal age, be innovative, country specific and culturally acceptable.
Keywords: Obesity, Young adults, Developing countries, Systematic
Introduction
Young adults between the ages of 18–25 are in a period of ‘transition’ from adolescence to adulthood. Until recently, it was perceived that obesity mostly affected middle age adults. However, a steadily increasing trend of obesity among young adults, especially college and university students, is becoming evident [1, 2]. Many young adults undergo significant lifestyle changes such as leaving home, going to university/college [3], starting work, developing relationships, possibly cohabiting or marrying [4], potentially experiencing pregnancy [5] and child rearing [6]. These transitions are seen as a time of displacement, when young people feel a sense of ‘loss’ and ‘discontinuity of their identity’ as they leave behind familiar contexts [7] and take on new ventures. These key time points in the life course, make young adults vulnerable to energy imbalance often leading to weight gain, which may not be concerning at the time but later accumulates. It is known that the interaction of social, psychological and biological factors that happen during these transition years may make them vulnerable to many risk taking behaviours [8••], but can be countered towards positive behavioural changes given constructive childhood and adolescent experiences [9, 10]. Nonetheless both positive and negative health behaviours established during this transition to adulthood often persist later into life [11] and hence this is a critical stage in a person’s life course [12]. It is also a time when inequalities of opportunity can be stark, with the transition period being particularly risky for those who are already vulnerable [13•, 14]. In spite of this recognition, young adults have been neglected both in terms of research and policy until recently [15].
Developed countries are only now beginning to recognise 18–25 year olds as a ‘vulnerable group’ for unhealthy lifestyles leading to overweight and obesity [16, 17•]. In contrast, among developing countries, obesity among all age groups was not even considered a public health problem until the early 1980–1990s and was perceived as a problem of developed countries. However, in the last two decades, several nutritional and socioeconomic transitions have changed the anthropometric measurements and health patterns of populations within developing countries [18••]. While conditions such as TB, diarrhoea and undernutrition are far from resolved, particularly in a few developing countries, the toll of obesity along with other NCD’s is escalating and seen as challenging to the health care infrastructure and health care delivery system of developing countries [19]. This current obesity epidemic is more pronounced in developing countries undergoing rapid epidemiological transitions (demographic, social and economic) with the anticipated tripling of obesity incidence in the near future [20••, 21]. This review aims to discuss the state and implications of overweight and obese young adults, who are in transition from adolescence to adulthood, specifically in the context of developing countries.
Definition of Young Adult and Methodology
A systematic search was conducted in four electronic bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, PsychINFO and Scopus) using a robust search strategy. The review included published literature from the start of the databases until May 2015, with no language restrictions. Appropriate MeSH terms and text words were used in the search strategy to capture all published literature on overweight and obesity among young adults in the developing (low and middle income) countries. Unfortunately, the term ‘young adults’ is often used to describe studies conducted among those ranging anywhere from 15 up to 50 years old. The definition of young adults is still ambiguous and intangible, with various definitions based on the stages of human development and sociological perspectives, defined by maturational, occupational, sexual and emotional indices [22–24]. However, for this review in the context of obesity, a tighter age range was required and so studies were only included if it was clearly stated in the title or abstract that participants were within the age range of 16–30 years; it was felt this would capture the age of transition from adolescence to adulthood for most global social settings. Studies were excluded if the mean age was over 30 years but also those with the wider age range (15–49 years old), which when inspected previously tended to have mean ages older than the group of interest [17•].
Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity and consequences
Prevalence of obesity among young adults in developing countries range from 2.3 to 12 %, with overweight as high as 28.8 % (Table 1). This is already more or less in line with developed countries where current estimates of the prevalence of being overweight or obese (OW/obesity) ranges from 22 to 35 % among the 18–23 years old in UK and the USA [2, 25]. Studies among Indian, Egyptian and Ugandan females showed significantly higher levels of overweight and central/truncal obesity [26–29]. In cross sectional studies, for both males and females, BMI, waist circumference and waist hip ratio increase with age from 15–19 year olds to 20–29 year olds, but this was observed especially among males [30]. Increasing trends with age were observed not only in weight gain but also for other cardiovascular risk factors [30, 31] (Table 2). In one study where weight was observed over two different 5 year periods (from 20–29 year olds to 25 to 34 years old), 42 % of men and 56 % of women gained more than 5 kg [31]. They found this corresponded to a mean increase in % body fat of +7.6 % points in men and +5.9 % points in women and waist circumference of +10.2 cm in men and +7.7 cm in women. The % body fat changes were also associated with changes in blood pressure and the total:HDL cholesterol ratio, and resulted in an increased odds of developing metabolic syndrome: an OR 1.19 (95 % CI 1.08–1.31) for a 1.31 unit change in % body fat and an OR 1.13 (95 % CI 1.07–1.20) for a 1.20/cm change in waist circumference. Recent observations suggest that 23 % of Saudi Arabian and 16.7 % of Egyptian 18–25 year old young adults were already at an increased risk of developing fatal cardiovascular disease within 10 years [32]. Overweight and obesity also has an impact on respiratory functions within this group with decrease in slow and forced vital capacity [33].
Table 1.
Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity among young adults
Author, Country, Year | Age | Setting | Sample size | Prevalence | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gupta R et al. India 2009 [30] | 15–19 years 20–29 years |
Schools and Colleges (Delhi and Jaipur) | Males 15–19 years = 699 20–29 years = 175 Females 15–19 years = 591 20–29 years = 311 |
Variables (at risk values) | Males | Females | |
BMI (≥25 kg/m2) | |||||||
15–19 years | 53 (7.6 %) | 52 (8.8 %) | |||||
20–29 years | 20 (11.5 %) | 23 (7.4 %) | |||||
BMI (≥30 kg/m2) | |||||||
15–19 years | 7 (1 %) | 5 (0.8 %) | |||||
20–29 years | 7 (4 %) | 7 (2.3 %) | |||||
Waist circumference (>90 cm/80 cm) | |||||||
15–19 years | 32 (4.6 %) | 36 (6.1 %) | |||||
20–29 years | 20 (11.4 %) | 31 (10.0 %) | |||||
Wait hip ratio (>0.9/0.8) | |||||||
15–19 years | 34 (4.9 %) | 85 (14.4 %) | |||||
20–29 years | 33 (18.9 %) | 107 (34.4 %) | |||||
Baalwa J et al. Uganda 2010 [26] | 18–30 years Mean age 19.0 ± 1.4 years |
Secondary schools in one urban and one rural area | 683 Young adults Males = 338 Females = 345 |
Variables (at risk values) | Males | Females | |
Overweight (≥25 kg/m2) | 3.3 % | 17.4 % | |||||
Obese (≥30 kg/m2) | 1.8 % | 2.9 % | |||||
Olusanya JO Nigeria 2011 [28] | 16–27 years | Tai Solarin University | 371 Students males = 151 Females = 220 |
Variables (at risk values) | Males | Females | |
Overweight and obesity (≥25 kg/m2) | 5.1 % | 10 % | |||||
Dhruv S et al. India 2012 [62] | 18–26 years Mean age 21 | University of Baroda | 1303 Females | Variables (at risk values) | Asia pacific cut off | WHO cut off | |
Overweight | 9 % | 10.1 % | |||||
Obese | 12.6 % | 2.5 % | |||||
Waist circumference (≥80 cm) | 12.7 % | ||||||
Waist Hip Ratio (WHR) ≥0.8 cut off | 21.2 % | ||||||
Saleem et al. Pakistan 2013 [55] | Mean age 19.59 ± 1.7 years |
University undergraduate students | Males = 856 Females = 544 |
Variables (at risk values) | Males | Females | |
Overweight (≥23–27.4 kg/m2) | 12.7 % | 8.3 % | |||||
Obese (≥27.4 kg/m2) | 12.9 % | 5.7 % | |||||
Peltzer K et al. 22 countries 2014 [34] |
16–30 years Mean age 20.8, SD 2.6 |
University undergraduate students from 22 countries | 15,746 Students | Variables (at risk values) | Males | Females | |
Overweight ( ≥23–27.4 kg/m2) | 18.9 % | 15.2 % | |||||
Obese (≥27.4 kg/m2) | 5.8 % | 5.2 % | |||||
Pengpid et al. India 2014 [29] |
17–20 years Mean age 18.2 years (SD 1) |
University students | Total 800 Males = 541 Females = 259 |
Variables (at risk values) | Males | Females | |
Overweight ( ≥23–27.4 kg/m2) | 28.8 % | 22.4 % | |||||
Obese (≥27.4 kg/m2) | 12 % | 12 % | |||||
Waist circumference (>90 cm in men/80 cm in women) | 12 % | 25.5 % | |||||
Faarag M et al. Egypt 2014 [27] | Mean age 20.2 ± 1.8 years | 10 Universities | Total 895 | Variables (at risk values) | Males | Females | Total |
Obese (≥30Kg/m2) | NR | NR | 13 % | ||||
Truncal obesity (Waist to height ratio) | 38.8 % | 51.7 % | |||||
Torun B et al. Guatemala 2002 [37] | 19–29 years old | Community | Males = 237 Females = 236 |
Variables (at risk values) | Non-migrants | Migrants | P values |
BMI (≥25Kg/m2) | |||||||
Females | 53 (30 %) | 12 (28 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 7 (7 %) | 12 (16 %) | 0.05 | ||||
BMI (≥30Kg/m2) | |||||||
Females | 17(10 %) | 3(7 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 3(3 %) | 0(0 %) | NS | ||||
Wait hip ratio (M ≥ 0.90; F ≥ 0.85) | |||||||
Females | 37 (22 %) | 1 (2 %) | 0.05 | ||||
Males | 24(25 %) | 12(16 %) | NS | ||||
Bhongir AV India 2011 [36] | 18–22 years | University (medical students in Hyderabad) |
Urban = 116 Rural = 116 |
Variables (at risk values) | Rural | Urban | P values |
BMI (≥25Kg/m2)- overweight and obese | |||||||
Total | 4 (3.5 %) | 37(31.9 %) | <0.001 | ||||
Females | 2 (3.5 %) | 22 (37.9 %) | <0.001 | ||||
Males | 2 (3.5 %) | 15 (25.9 %) | <0.001 | ||||
Wait hip ratio (M ≥ 0.90; F ≥ 0.83) | |||||||
Total | 7 (6.0 %) | 17 (15.5 %) | NS | ||||
Females | 6 (10.3 %) | 6 (10.3 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 1 (1.7 %) | 11 (19.0 %) | <0.001 |
NR Not Reported, NS Not Significant, BMI Body Mass Index
Table 2.
Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk factors among young adults
Author, Country, Year | Age | Setting | Sample size | Prevalence | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gupta R et al. India 2009 [30] | 15–19 years 20–29 years |
Schools and Colleges (Delhi and Jaipur) | Males 15–19 years = 699 20–29 years = 175 Females 15–19 years = 591 20–29 years = 311 |
Variables (at risk values) | Males | Females | |
Diabetes mellitus (≥126 mg/dl) | |||||||
15–19 years | – | – | |||||
20–29 years | 1 (0.6 %) | – | |||||
Hypertension (value cut-offs not reported) | |||||||
15–19 years | 16 (2.3 %) | 2 (0.3 %) | |||||
20–29 years | 10 (5.7 %) | 5 (1.6 %) | |||||
HDL cholesterol (<40 mg/dl) | |||||||
15–19 years | 56 (8.0 %) | 268 (45.3 %) | |||||
20–29 years | 30 (17.1 %) | 120 (38.6 %) | |||||
LDL cholesterol (≥130 mg/dl) | |||||||
15–19 years | 17 (2.4 %) | 19 (3.2 %) | |||||
20–29 years | 24 (13.7 %) | 18 (5.8 %) | |||||
Total:HDL cholesterol ratio (≥4.5) | |||||||
15–19 years | 26 (3.7 %) | 28 (4.7 %) | |||||
20–29 years | 30 (17.1 %) | 22 (7.1 %) | |||||
Dhruv S et al. India 2012 [62] | 18–26 years Mean age 21 |
University of Baroda | 1303 females | Variables (at risk values) | Females | ||
Metabolic syndrome—IDF definition | 2.4 % (4.1 % by WHO definition) |
||||||
Low HDL cholesterol (<40 mg/dl) | 40.3 % | ||||||
High LDL cholesterol | 12.1 % | ||||||
Madeira FB et al. Brazil 2013 [39] | 23–25-year-olds | Young adults from 1978/79 Ribeirao Preto birth cohort | 1222 Normal weight obesity (NWO) young adults Males = 546 Females = 676 |
Variables (at risk values) | Males | Females | P value |
Metabolic syndrome—JIS definition | 3.1 % | 0.9 % | 0.004 | ||||
Waist circumference (>90 cm in men/80 cm in women) | 6.8 % | 6.5 % | 0.852 | ||||
Low HDL cholesterol (<40 mg/dl for men and <50 mg/dl in women) | 31.2 % | 38 % | 0.014 | ||||
High blood pressure (≥130/85 mmHg) | 28.9 % | 3.3 % | <0.001 | ||||
Fasting glucose (≥100 mg/dl) | 4.4 % | 1.7 % | 0.004 | ||||
HOMA2 insulin resistance (>1.8) | 2.0 % | 2.6 % | 0.539 | ||||
Bhongir AV India 2011 [36] | 18-22 yrs | University (medical students in Hyderabad) |
Urban = 116 Rural = 116 |
Variables (at risk values) | Rural | Urban | P values |
Fasting glucose (≥100 mg/dl) | |||||||
Total | 2 (1.7 %) | 0 (0 %) | NS | ||||
Females | 1 (1.7 %) | 0 (0 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 1 (1.7 %) | 0 (0 %) | NS | ||||
Hypertension (≥130/80 mmHg) | |||||||
Total | 15 (12.9 %) | 18 (15.5 %) | NS | ||||
Females | 6 (10.3 %) | 2 (3.5 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 9(15.8 %) | 16 (27.6 %) | NS | ||||
Total cholesterol (≥200 mg/dl) | |||||||
Total | 1 (0.9 %) | 7 (6 %) | <0.05 | ||||
Females | 1 (1.7 %) | 4 (6.9 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 0 (0 %) | 3 (5.2 %) | NS | ||||
Low HDL (<50 mg/dl) | |||||||
Total | 69 (59.5 %) | 66 (56.9 %) | NS | ||||
Females | 49 (85.0 %) | 46 (79.3 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 21 (35.6 %) | 20 (34.5 %) | NS | ||||
Physical exercise (>4 hrs a week) | |||||||
Total | 58 (50.0 %) | 42 (36.2 %) | NS | ||||
Females | 33 (56.9 %) | 16 (27.6 %) | <0.05 | ||||
Males | 25 (43.1 %) | 26 (44.8 %) | NS | ||||
Torun B et al. Guatemala 2002 [37] | 19–29 years old | Community | Males = 237 Females = 236 |
Variables (at risk values) | Non-migrants | Migrants | P values |
Fasting glucose (>6.1 mmol/l) | |||||||
Females | 4 (2 %) | 0 (0 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 3 (3 %) | 1 (1 %) | NS | ||||
Total cholesterol (>5.2 mmol/l) | |||||||
Females | 29 (17 %) | 5 (12 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 5 (5 %) | 8 (11 %) | NS | ||||
Low HDL (<0.9 mmol/l) | |||||||
Females | 55 (33 %) | 7 (17 %) | <0.05 | ||||
Males | 40 (44 %) | 36 (52 %) | NS | ||||
Moderate physical exercise (MET/24 hr) | |||||||
Females | 32 (18 %) | 6 (14 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 75 (73 %) | 16 (21 %) | <0.05 | ||||
% Body fat (>23.9 in men; >29.9 in women) | |||||||
Females | 75 (43 %) | 20 (47 %) | NS | ||||
Males | 4 (4 %) | 3 (4 %) | NS |
HDL high density lipoprotein, LDL Low Density Lipoprotein, JIS Joint Interim Statement of the IDF International Diabetes Federation, HOMA Homeostasis Model Assessment 2, MET Metabolic Equivalents
A study, looking across 22 low and middle income countries, was conducted among 15,746 undergraduate students from 22 universities with mean age of 20.8 years. This highlighted that overall 22 % of young adults were OW/obese, with men (24.7 %) more than women (19.3 %) [34]. They also found the average age of these OW/obese men was younger (16–19) compared to women (22 years or more). However, for obesity alone, in sub-Saharan Africa and in Latin America, females were more obese whereas in Asia and North Africa (except Egypt and Tunisia), male obesity was more than the female obesity. Whether this links to the social disadvantages that women might encounter in Asia/North Africa is not clear yet.
A concept of Normal Weight Obesity (NWO) has now emerged, where individuals have a normal BMI of between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2 but the sum of their triceps and sub-scapular skinfolds is >90th percentile which corresponds to >23.1 % body fat in men and >33.3 % body fat in women. This has now also been observed among young people in low and middle income countries; with a study of 1222 normal BMI young adults between the ages of 23 and 25 years in Brazil finding 111 had NWO [35••]. These individuals had an increased risk of the Metabolic Syndrome (OR 6.83, 95 % CI 2.84–16.83), increased waist circumference (OR 8.46, 95 % CI 5.09–14.04), low HDL (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.11–2.47), insulin resistance (OR 3.81, 1.57–9.28) and low Insulin sensitivity (OR 3.89, 95 % CI 2.39–6.33) (Table 2).
Urban-Rural Variations
Economic progress and industrialisation in many developing countries has seen massive rural to urban transitions. This has led to many related changes in lifestyles, resulting in increased rates of obesity and cardiovascular risk factors. Among 18–22 year old Indian young adults, BMI was significantly higher in urban men and women than their rural counterparts with a trend of higher waist to hip (W:H) ratios amongt the urban young adults albeit significant only in males [36]. Total cholesterol was also significantly higher for urban young adults, and urban women were also significantly less physically active [36]. Also highlighted was that while 70 % of rural young and 13.8 % of urban young were underweight (data not shown), 3.5 % of rural youth and 31.9 % of urban young were overweight or obese (OW/obese). The tenfold increase in the prevalence of OW/obesity in the urban young is of concern. In contrast, in Guatemala [37], both urban women who migrated from rural areas (migrants) and rural (non-migrants) women tended to be overweight; however only urban men were more overweight than their rural counterparts. Irrespective of BMI, rural men and women had more abdominal fat than those in urban areas and all, regardless of gender or location had lower levels of physical activity. Rural (non-migrant) women significantly were seen to have lower HDL compared to migrants, which is another indicator of cardiovascular disease. In Uganda, no difference was found in the prevalence of overweight between urban and rural areas [26].
It could be speculated that in some countries, the differences between the rural and urban lifestyle has narrowed as globalisation blurs the boundaries of the socioeconomic divide. Among 21 year old Filipino young females, there was an interaction between urbanicity, a persons’ assets and being overweight [38•]. Using a measure of urbanicity based on assets, together with income and level of education [39], they found that for those at the lower end of the scale, a one point increase in assets was associated with a 29 % increase in being overweight (OR 1.29 95 % CI 1.01–1.65); however, at the highest level of urbanicity, the same increase in assets was only associated with a non-significant 8 % reduction in overweight (OR 0.92 95 % CI 0.76–1.11) [39].
Influences and Risk Factors
Weight problems in young adults have been linked to factors in gestation and early development particularly in young adults in low to middle income countries. Associations between BMI and/or waist circumference of young adults have been found with maternal anthropometry, foetal nutritional insufficiency due to inadequate maternal nutrition, birth weight, birth order and early child growth [40–42]. A study by Adair [40] showed that a mother’s arm fat area during pregnancy is positively associated with higher birth weight (β = 0.421 in boys and 1.108 in girls) and higher BMIs when their offspring are 21 years old (β = 0.489 in young males and 0.783 in young females). Similarly, Dahly [41] showed that maternal height and arm fat area were positive predictors of central obesity for 21 year old Filipino males. Among Brazilians young adults (23 year olds), their mothers’ pre pregnancy BMI was positively correlated with their own BMI and waist: hip ratio (p < 0.0001) [42].
With respect to socioeconomic status (SES), higher parental SES at birth and improved childhood SES had significant association with increased BMI in males (β = 2.04) but was decreased for female young Filipino adults (β = −2.188) [40]. Socioeconomic status and college education at 21.5 years was positively associated with overweight and increased waist circumference of young adults within the Philippines [41]. Multivariate linear models showed that one Standard Deviation (SD) increase in SES was associated with 149 % increase in odds of having a higher waist circumference (OR 2.49; 95 % CI 1.65–3.76), although this was attenuated by low birth order [41]. First born children from the high socioeconomic groups in this study had low birth weight and but had a rapid post-natal gain. These children had the largest increase in childhood BMI which continued into young adulthood as shown by other studies [43, 44]. These studies also show that while inadequate maternal nutrition and poor birth outcomes such as low birth weight leading to stunted child growth might be common in developing countries, there are indicators that socioeconomic improvement in developing countries could lead to rapid post-natal weight gain. This then contributes to higher BMI in young adults as they grow up in developing world settings. Although there is evidence that maternal factors play a part in the offspring’s BMI in young adulthood, environmental and behavioural factors has to be considered.
The comparison by Peltzer and others [34] across 22 developing countries showed, that for both men and women, physically inactivity and childhood physical abuse increased the risk of OW/obese, more so in the relatively higher income countries. However this study highlighted some unexpected findings—those who consciously avoided fat and cholesterol were OW/obese. A potential explanation given by the authors was that those avoiding the fatty food were already self-reportedly obese. They also found, women with post-traumatic stress disorder and/or attending frequent religious activity tended to be more OW/obese. The former could potentially be linked to depression, a known obesity related factor [45–47], but the latter could be related with religious beliefs or cultural norms regarding body image among women. Some religious organisations will provide a social network for being physically active however this might vary. Similarly, religious doctrinal beliefs can dictate intake of specific foods, beneficial or detrimental. This variation in the impact of religious activities on diet and physical activity needs further exploration [48•]. As in developed countries leaving home can have an impact on weight status [3]; in India [29], young males living away from their parents were more likely to have central obesity (AOR 1.79, 95 % CI 1.04–3.07).
Perceptions of Body Weight and Image
Perceptions of body weight and the influence of body image on self-esteem, happiness, wellbeing and health can consequently lead to obesity [49, 50]. In developed western cultures, thinness is associated with being attractive, elegant and being in control [51]. This perception is different and contrary in some developing countries [52] where being ‘big’ is a sign of prosperity and good health [53, 54]. In Pakistan [55], 43 % of young males and 41 % of females misjudged their weights. While underestimation was more common in males, overestimation was seen more in females. The highest rate of misjudgement were among overweight males compared to females (95.4 vs 80 % females), where males underestimated their weights eight times more compared to females (OR 8.054, 95 % CI 5.34–12.13). This weight misperception increased with age (1.114, 95 % CI 1.041–1.191). Among 21-year-olds in Nigeria, 40 % of overweight males perceived overweight as the ideal body image where as 100 % overweight females perceived normal weight as ideal body image [56•]. Similarly all the obese young men in this study perceived being overweight as ideal while 67 % of the obese females perceived normal weight as ideal. These views are more in line with western perceptions. This gender discrepancy of body image perception shows that the cultural boundaries are disappearing through globalisation and technological innovation and if unabated, might push the young men wanting to gain weight to attain the ‘ideal’ buff image, while women might desire to lose weight, which in western cultures has led to often unattainable goals.
Discussion
Obesity is a growing global Public Health concern affecting people of all age groups and socioeconomic status. Lower and middle income countries (LMIC) are also experiencing a marked increase in overweight and obesity, and yet at the same time are continuing to face major economic difficulties and increased food prices. While disease associated with under-nutrition is still a major issue, these are now being overtaken by diseases linked to unhealthy lifestyles, overweight and obesity [18••]. In countries undergoing social and economic transitions, there is a shift to more affluent social structures with a need to identify themselves with modern society. However, cultural values in favour of large body size traditionally associated with fertility and prosperity still persists in some countries [57].
Young people living in countries making the socioeconomic shift, are particularly affected by the social and environmental factors such as financial independence, the easy availability of ‘ready to eat’ food stuffs, the growing numbers of fast food chain shops, which are all part of adopting western life culture. The now readily available readymade foods and high sweetened beverages are more convenient and highly desirable, especially to young people. These are high in calories and fat content, making young people susceptible to an obesogenic environment [58–60] and incline towards unhealthy habits [61]. Huang et al. showed that less than a quarter of USA college students (18–24 years old) consumed at least five servings of fruit and vegetable per day [59]. The increased consumption of fast foods, snacking and skipping breakfast in young adults all escalate the risk of being overweight or obese later on in life [28, 62, 63]. Further changes from active to sedentary lifestyles both in and outside the workplace, the lack of time due to work commitments, the long hours and day-night duty rotations along with psychological changes related to the material and social environments all make it difficult for young people in this age group to be additionally involved in any kind of physical activity [64, 65]. While there is evidence that maternal/early life factors influence the increased levels of obesity, the poor response to later life challenges such as the ever increasing obesogenic environment adds to the concern for countries with low resources with the inevitable increase in non-communicable diseases [66, 67]. Given many young people between the ages of 18–25 will also be becoming parents, educating them on these aspects also becomes crucial.
Most developing countries are seeing higher overweight/obesity prevalence among females, with some exceptions. Obesity increases with age but among young adults in developing countries the average weight gain of 1 kg/year [31] is greater than that observed in developed countries (0.4–0.9 kg/year) [68, 69]. With the increased obesity levels seen in such a short period of time between 16–25 years of age, a logical argument would be to intervene earlier, however, young people in transition are very different to their younger selves with parental influences. Between the ages of 16–25, they have the independence to take risks with their lifestyle behaviours and future health is not their priority. The ideal age to intervene for this heterogeneous age group is an issue faced by researchers for other conditions such as cervical cancer screening [70, 71••] but generally there is a self-realisation that they should consider improving their lifestyle at around the age of 21 [9].
Perceptions of body image are continually changing among young adults in developing countries [72, 73]. Studies have shown that those with accurate perceptions of their own weight are more in control of their behaviours [74, 75]. Consequently, efforts to promote positive and yet realistic body image is equally important in addition to healthy eating and exercise behaviours. Such changes in body sizes are also mediated by social factors as explored by Sobal [76]. They showed that SES was positively associated with obesity in developing countries but negatively in developed countries. However, as economic status shifts, which in some cases has been rapid, the obesity/SES relationship is changing among young people, whereby low SES groups are more prone to obesity [41]. The SES and obesity gradient is inversely shifting in the low and the middle income countries and is becoming more like high income countries, particularly for women [77].
The evidence of NWO in low and middle income countries, particularly among young adults, is of concern especially with the potential increased risk of cardiovascular disease. In some low and middle income countries, obesity is assessed only by BMI. This isolated use of BMI runs the risk of missing those who, in spite of having a normal BMI, are at risk of metabolic disorders later on. Ideally other measures such as DEXA scans would more accurately measure the body composition but even incorporating other more convenient low cost measures like skin folds or waist circumference would be valuable in assessing excess body fat in young individuals with normal BMI, given the metabolic changes are observed early in the life course [78].
It is worth noting that, in spite of a robust search of studies conducted among young adults in developing countries, all the included studies were either cross sectional or secondary analysis from birth cohorts and health surveys, which can only highlight the prevalence of obesity and some of the contributing factors and consequences of being overweight or obese. Most studies have identified that the rapid socioeconomic transitions in developing countries are having a huge impact on obesity levels and are contributing to cardiovascular diseases. This is now a leading cause of death in all regions of the world, and that more than 80 % of the global disease burden is in low and middle income countries [79, 80]. In spite of this recognition, with many studies suggesting the need for interventions and improvement in public health policies, we found no evidence of interventions being conducted among young adults in developing countries.
There are some limitations that need to be acknowledged. Our search terms were ‘18–25 year olds’ and ‘young adults in transition’ and consequently some studies conducted among University students that did not mention our specific age range could have been missed in our search. Further, this article has focussed on over-nutrition among young adults, however, the problems of under-nutrition, eating disorders and the double burden of over and under-nutrition in transition countries [62, 81], while acknowledged, have not been explored to the same extent.
Conclusion
Young adults (18–25 year olds) are prone to overweight and obesity during the transition from adolescence to adult in developing countries as much as in developed countries. Levels of overweight and obesity together with other cardiovascular risk factors increase with age even within this age span (18–25 years old). Using other convenient low cost measures to assess body fat in addition to BMI to measure obesity might be useful to identify Normal Weight Obesity in young adults, which is especially important to counter the risk of metabolic imbalances in later life. Understanding the epidemiology of obesity and investigating the optimal time to intervene is crucial. We found no recorded obesity prevention interventions being conducted in developing countries within this age group. Culturally acceptable interventions based on evidence need to be developed and evaluated. In turn these will inform future policy makers to help plan effective strategies to prevent obesity among young people.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Amudha Poobalan and Lorna Aucott declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This review article cites papers published by the authors which were conducted among human subjects. Ethical approval and informed consent was obtained for these cited studies and have been declared in the respective papers.
Footnotes
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Etiology of Obesity
Contributor Information
Amudha Poobalan, Phone: +44 1224 437866, Email: a.poobalan@abdn.ac.uk.
Lorna Aucott, Phone: +44 1224 437150, Email: l.aucott@abdn.ac.uk.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Anderson DA, Shapiro JR, Lundgren JD. The freshman year of college as a critical period of weight gain: an initial evaluation. Eat Behaviours. 2003;4:367. doi: 10.1016/S1471-0153(03)00030-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lowry R, Galuska DA, Fulton JE, Wechsler H, Kann L, Collins JL. Physical activity, food choice, and weight management goals and practices among US college students. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:18–27. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00107-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Butler SM, Black DR, Blue CL, Gretebeck RJ. Change in diet, physical activity, and body weight in female college freshman. Am J Health Behav. 2004;28:24–32. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.28.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burke V, Mori TA, Giangiulio N, Gillam HF, Beilin LJ, Houghton S, et al. An innovative program for changing health behaviours. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11(Suppl 3):S586–S597. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.supp3.8.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Linne Y, Dye L, Barkeling B, Rossner S. Weight development over time in parous women—the SPAWN study—15 years follow-up. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:1516–1522. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Burke V, Beilin LJ, Dunbar D, Kevan M. Changes in health-related behaviours and cardiovascular risk factors in young adults: associations with living with a partner. Prev Med. 2004;39:722–730. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Scanlon L, Rowling L, Weber Z. ‘You don’t have like an identity…you are just lost in a crowd’: forming a student identity in the first year transition to university. J Youth Stud. 2007;10:223–241. doi: 10.1080/13676260600983684. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.••.Aucott L, Poobalan A, McCallum M, Smith WCS. Mental wellbeing related to lifestyle and risky behaviours in 18–25 year old: evidence from North East Scotland. Int J Pub Health Res. 2014;4:431–440. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Clarke A, Smith WCS. Diet behaviour among young people in transition to adulthood (18–25 year olds): a mixed method study. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2014;2:909–928. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2014.931232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Clarke A, Smith WC. Physical activity attitudes, intentions and behaviour among 18–25 year olds: a mixed method study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:2012. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parcel G, Muraskin L, Endert C. Community education study report. J Adolesc Health Care. 1988;9:415–453. doi: 10.1016/0197-0070(88)90008-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Howarth C, Street C. Sidelined: young adults’ access to services. London: New Policy Institute; 2000. pp. 1–44. [Google Scholar]
- 13.•.Berzin SC. Vulnerability in the transition to adulthood: defining risk based on youth profiles. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32:487–495. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mitchell M, Jones T, Renema S. Will I make it on my own? Voices and visions of 17 year old youth in transition. Child Adolesc Soc Work J. 2015;32:291–300. doi: 10.1007/s10560-014-0364-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.The Prince’s Trust. Prince’s Trust—reaching the hardest to reach. DSN 0063, 1–77. 2004. London, The Prince’s Trust. 7-2-2011.
- 16.Jekielek S, Brown B. The transition to adulthood: characteristics of young adults ages 18 to 24 in America. 1–41. 2005. Washington, DC, The Annie E. Casey Foundation, Population Reference Bureau and Child trends.
- 17.•.Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Precious E, Crombie IK, Smith WC. Weight loss interventions in young people (18 to 25 year olds): a systematic review. [Review] [44 refs] Obes Rev. 2010;11:580–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00673.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.••.Popkin BM, Adair LS, Ng SW. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. [Review] Nutr Rev. 2012;70:3–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00456.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Unnikrishnan AG, Kalra S, Garg MK. Preventing obesity in India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16:4–6. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.91174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.••.Jones-Smith JC, Gordon-Larsen P, Siddiqi A, Popkin BM. Is the burden of overweight shifting to the poor across the globe? Time trends among women in 39 low- and middle-income countries (1991–2008) Int J Obes. 2012;36:1114–1120. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Popkin BM, Gordon-Larsen P: The nutrition transition: worldwide obesity dynamics and their determinants. [Review] [51 refs]. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004, 28: Suppl-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 22.Arnett J. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55:469–480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Erikson E. Identity youth and crisis. New York: Norton; 1968. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ornstein R. The sociology of young adulthood: an introductory study of the unknown. Internet. 2015. 13-10-2015.
- 25.Mirmiran P, Mirbolooki M, Azizi F. Familial clustering of obesity and the role of nutrition: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Int J Obes. 2002;26:01. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baalwa J, Byarugaba BB, Kabagambe EK, Otim AM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in young adults in Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2010;10:367–373. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Farrag M, Ibrahim AM, Ibrahim M: Prevalence of obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors in young Egyptian adults. Global Heart Conference: World Congress of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2014, WCC 2014 Melbourne, VIC Australia Conference Start: 20140504 Conference End: 20140507 Conference Publication: (var pagings) 9: March.
- 28.Olusanya JO, Omotayo OA: Prevalence of obesity among undergraduate students of Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijagun, Ijebu-Ode. Pak J Nutr 10: 2011.
- 29.Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Prevalence of overweight/obesity and central obesity and its associated factors among a sample of university students in India. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2014;8:e558–e570. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2013.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gupta R, Misra A, Vikram NK, Kondal D, Gupta SS, Agrawal A, et al. Younger age of escalation of cardiovascular risk factors in Asian Indian subjects. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009;9:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-9-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gregory CO, Martorell R, Narayan KM, Ramirez-Zea M, Stein AD. Five-year changes in adiposity and cardio-metabolic risk factors among Guatemalan young adults. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:228–235. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008003443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mahmoud AEDH. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors among Egyptian and Saudi medical students: a comparative study. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2015;90:35–39. doi: 10.1097/01.EPX.0000460969.93981.c2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shenoy J, Shivakumar J, Deepti KS, Mirajkar A, Muniyappanavar NS, Pai PG: Status of Pulmonary function in Indian young overweight male individuals. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 2: October-December.
- 34.Peltzer K, Pengpid S, Samuels TA, Ozcan NK, Mantilla C, Rahamefy OH, et al. Prevalence of overweight/obesity and its associated factors among university students from 22 countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:7425–7441. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110707425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.••.Madeira FB, Silva AA, Veloso HF, Goldani MZ, Kac G, Cardoso VC, et al. Normal weight obesity is associated with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in young adults from a middle-income country. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e60673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bhongir AV, Nemani S, Reddy PS. Rural–urban epidemiologic transition of risk factors for coronary artery disease in college students of Hyderabad and nearby rural area—a pilot study. J Assoc Physicians India. 2011;59:222–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Torun B, Stein AD, Schroeder D, Grajeda R, Conlisk A, Rodriguez M, et al. Rural-to-urban migration and cardiovascular disease risk factors in young Guatemalan adults. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:218–226. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.•.Dahly DL, Gordon-Larsen P, Popkin BM, Kaufman JS, Adair LS. Associations between multiple indicators of socioeconomic status and obesity in young adult Filipinos vary by gender, urbanicity, and indicator used. J Nutr. 2010;140:366–370. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.114207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dahly DL, Adair LS. Quantifying the urban environment: a scale measure of urbanicity outperforms the urban–rural dichotomy. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1407–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Adair LS. Size at birth and growth trajectories to young adulthood. Am J Hum Biol. 2007;19:327–337. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dahly DL, Adair LS. Does lower birth order amplify the association between high socioeconomic status and central adiposity in young adult Filipino males? Int J Obes. 2010;34:751–759. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tequeanes AL, Gigante DP, Assuncao MC, Chica DA, Horta BL. Maternal anthropometry is associated with the body mass index and waist:height ratio of offspring at 23 years of age. J Nutr. 2009;139:750–754. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.100669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nazmi A, Oliveira IO, Horta BL, Gigante DP, Victora CG. Lifecourse socioeconomic trajectories and C-reactive protein levels in young adults: findings from a Brazilian birth cohort. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1229–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schmeer KK. Household income during childhood and young adult weight status: evidence from a nutrition transition setting. J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51:79–91. doi: 10.1177/0022146509361178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Behan C, Doyle R, Masterson S, Shiers D, Clarke M. A double-edged sword: review of the interplay between physical health and mental health. Ir J Med Sci. 2015;184:107–112. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1205-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Correia J, Ravasco P. Weight changes in Portuguese patients with depression: which factors are involved? Nutr J. 2014;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hawkins MA, Miller DK, Stewart JC. A 9-year, bidirectional prospective analysis of depressive symptoms and adiposity: the African American Health Study. Obesity. 2015;23:192–199. doi: 10.1002/oby.20893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.•.Yeary KHK, SongthipT, Ounpraseuth, Kuo DZ, Harris K, Stewart K et al.. To what extent do community members personal health beleifs and experiences impact what they consider to be important for their community at large? J Public Heatlh, 2015. doi:10.1093/Pubmed/fdv118. This paper illustrates that the culture and the context is important with respect to enhancing the beliefs about adhering to a healthy lifestyle. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Brener ND, Eaton DK, Lowry R, McManus T. The association between weight perception and BMI among high school students. Obes Res. 2004;12:1866–1874. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Flynn K, Fitzgibbon BM. Body images and obesity risk among black females: a review of literature. Ann Behav Med. 1998;20:13–24. doi: 10.1007/BF02893804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Metealf PA, Seragg RK, Willoghby P, Finau S, Tippen-Leach D. Ethnic differences in perceptions of body size in middle aged European, Maori and Pacific people living in New Zealand. Int J of Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:593–599. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Holdsworth M, Gartner A, Landais E, Maire B, Delpeuch F. Perceptions of healthy and desirable body size in urban Senegalese women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1561–1568. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Howard NJ, Hugo GJ, Taylor AW, Wilson DH. Our perception of weight: socioeconomic and sociocultural explanations. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2008;2:125–131. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Simkhada P, Poobalan A, Simkhada PP, Amalraj R, Aucott L: Knowledge, attitude and prevalence of overweight and obesity among civil servants in Nepal. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2009;23(4):507–517. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 55.Saleem MD, Ahmed G, Mulla J, Haider SS, Abbas M. Weight misperception amongst youth of a developing country: Pakistan—a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:707. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.•.Maruf FA, Akinpelu AO, Nwankwo MJ. Perceived body image and weight: discrepancies and gender differences among University undergraduates. Afr Health Sci. 2012;12:464–472. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v12i4.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kanter R, Caballero B. Global gender disparities in obesity: a review. Adv Nutr. 2012;3:491–498. doi: 10.3945/an.112.002063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Berkey CS, Rockett HR, Field AE, Gillman MW, Colditz GA. Sugar-added beverages and adolescent weight change. Obes Res. 2004;12:778–788. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Huang TT, Harris KJ, Lee RE, Nazir N, Born W, Kaur H. Assessing overweight, obesity, diet, and physical activity in college students. J Am Coll Heal. 2003;52:83–86. doi: 10.1080/07448480309595728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Huffman L, West DS. Readiness to change sugar sweetened beverage intake among college students. Eat. 2007;8:10–14. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.French SA, Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D, Fulkerson JA, Hannan P. Fast food restaurant use among adolescents: associations with nutrient intake, food choices and behavioral and psychosocial variables. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25:1823–1833. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dhruv S, Iyer U, Bhatt K: Assessment of cardio-metabolic risk factors among young adult females. Am J Infect Dis 8: 2012.
- 63.Niemeier HM, Raynor HA, Lloyd-Richardson EE, Rogers ML, Wing RR. Fast food consumption and breakfast skipping: predictors of weight gain from adolescence to adulthood in a nationally representative sample. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39:842–849. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Boyce RW, Boone EL, Cioci BW, Lee AH. Physical activity, weight gain and occupational health among call centre employees. Occup Med (Oxford) 2008;58:238–244. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqm135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Marmot M. Multilevel approaches to understanding social determinants. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 349–367. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hanson MA, Gluckman PD: Developmental origins of health and disease: moving from biological concepts to interventions and policy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 115: November. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 67.Krassas GE, Tzotzas T: Do obese children become obese adults: childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 1: August. [PubMed]
- 68.Ball K, Crawford D, Ireland P, Hodge A. Patterns and demographic predictors of 5-year weight change in a multi-ethnic cohort of men and women in Australia. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6:269–281. doi: 10.1079/PHN2002431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lahmann PH, Lissner L, Gullberg B, Berglund G. Sociodemographic factors associated with long-term weight gain, current body fatness and central adiposity in Swedish women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:685–694. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Porras C, Rodriguez AC, Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Gonzalez P, Wacholder S, et al. Human papillomavirus types by age in cervical cancer precursors: predominance of human papillomavirus 16 in young women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18:863–865. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.••.Schiffman M, Wacholder S. From India to the world—a better way to prevent cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1453–1455. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0901167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Devlin MJ, Zhu AJ. Body image in the balance. JAMA. 2001;286:2159. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.17.2159-JMS1107-3-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Durvasula S, Lysonski S, Watson J. Does vanity describe other cultures? A cross-cultural examination of vanity scale. J Consum Aff. 2001;35:180–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00108.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Jones M, Grilo CM, Masheb RM, White MA. Psychological and behavioral correlates of excess weight: misperception of obese status among persons with Class II obesity. Int J Eat Disord. 2010;43:628–632. doi: 10.1002/eat.20746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Skinner AC, Weinberger M, Mulvaney S, Schlundt D, Rothman RL. Accuracy of perceptions of overweight and relation to self-care behaviors among adolescents with type 2 diabetes and their parents. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:227–229. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychol Bull. 1989;105:260–275. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Monteiro CA, Conde WL, Lu B, Popkin BM. Obesity and inequities in health in the developing world. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1181–1186. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.De LA, Bianchi A, Maroni P, Iannarelli A, Di DN, Iacopino L, et al. Adiposity rather than BMI determines metabolic risk. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yusuf S, Reddy S, Ounpuu S, Anand S. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation. 2001;104:2746–2753. doi: 10.1161/hc4601.099487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Yusuf S, Ounpuu S, Anand S: The global epidemic of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Med Princ Pract 2002, 11: Suppl-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 81.Sanlier N, Yabanci N, Alyakut O. An evaluation of eating disorders among a group of Turkish university students. Appetite. 2008;51:641–645. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]