Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 28;310(1):R66–R73. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00066.2015

Table 1.

Food intake data during CPP training

Experiment Group n Days 2/3 Days 4/5 Days 6/7
Experiment 2
    CPP SH 4 1.1 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.4
Experiment 3
    CPP RH SH 6 1.8 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.5 3.2 ± 0.3
RH 6 1.8 ± 0.5 2.8 ± 0.5 3.3 ± 0.4
Experiment 4
    CPP SH SB-334867A SAL + VEH 4 1.0 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.6 2.6 ± 0.6
SAL + SB-334867A 4 1.6 ± 0.4 2.7 ± 0.5 3.0 ± 0.4
HYPO + VEH 4 1.5 ± 0.3 1.9 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.5
HYPO + SB-334867A 4 1.3 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.3 3.2 ± 0.2
Experiment 5
    CPP SERT SH 7 1.4 ± 0.4 2.2 ± 0.5 2.8 ± 0.6
RH 8 1.5 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 0.4 2.7 ± 0.6

Data are means ± SE; n, no. of rats. CPP, conditioned place preference; SH, saline hypoglycemia; RH, recurrent insulin-induced hypoglycemia; SERT, sertraline; SAL, saline; VEH, vehicle; HYPO, hypothalamic. On alternating days (days 2, 4, and 6 or days 3, 5, and 7), rats received approximately 3 g chocolate (Nestle Chocolate Drops) on the nonpreferred side (as determined from the pretest on day 1), and their intake was measured. There were no significant differences between groups.