Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 18;6:23223. doi: 10.1038/srep23223

Table 1. Characteristics of trial participants stratified according to treatment allocation (intravenous catheterisation on dorsum of hand or lower forearm).

  Hand Dorsum n = 154 Forearm n = 153
Age (years) 29.8 ± 3.8 29.7 ± 3.8
Gestational age (weeks) 39.3 ± 1.1 39.3 ± 1.2
Body Mass Index 28.4 ± 4.8 28.7 ± 4.7
Parity
Nulliparous 70 (45.5) 66 (43.1)
Para 1 39 (25.3) 47 (30.7)
Para 2 and above 45 (29.2) 40 (26.1)
Ethnicity
Malay 110 (71.4) 95 (62.1)
Chinese 22 (14.3) 30 (19.6)
Indian 14 (9.1) 12 (7.8)
Others 8 (5.2) 16 (10.5)
Handedness2
Right 138 (89.6) 139 (90.8)
Left 16 (10.4) 14 (9.2)
Anticipated use of intravenous catheter1
Blood taking 144 (93.5) 143 (93.5)
Intravenous fluid 65 (42.2) 74 (48.4)
Precautionary 49 (31.8) 46 (30.3)
Intravenous drug 23 (14.9) 23 (15.0)
Blood transfusion 5 (3.2) 2 (1.3)
Participants’ preferred site (at enrolment)2
Dorsum of hand 45 (29.2) 34 (22.2)
Forearm 14 (9.1) 18 (11.8)
No preference 95 (61.7) 101 (66.0)
Non-dominant arm first attempt 118 (76.6) 124 (81.0)
Inserter experience3
House officer 129 (83.8) 133 (86.9)
Medical officer 25 (16.2) 20 (13.1)
Participants undelivered at hospital discharge 5 (3.2) 10 (6.6)

Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation and number (%). Analyses by Student t test for comparison of means for continuous data, Fisher’s exact test for 2 × 2 categorical datasets and Chi Square test for larger than 2 × 2 categorical datasets. P > 0.05 for all analyses.

1Providers may provide more than one anticipated use for intravenous cannulation.

2As stated by participants.

3Preregistration house officers participating in the trial have a minimum 6 months post basic qualification experience and were independently inserting peripheral intravenous cannulas. Medical officers were registered medical practitioners and all were in the obstetrics and gynaecology specialist trainee program.