Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 17;15:55. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0454-2

Table 4.

Kinetic study of the effect of total organic carbon (TOC) concentration

TOC (g/L) CDM PHA Yield μ ρ Productivity
(g/L) Content (wt %) (g PHA/g RCM) (1/h) (g PHA/g CDM/h) [g PHA/(L h)]
TOC 5 g/L
 Acinetobacter sp. ASC1 12.0 ± 0.1 15.6 ± 1.7 0.19 0.033 0.007 0.05
 Pseudomonas sp. ASC2 12.2 ± 0.2 22.4 ± 2.4 0.29 0.031 0.012 0.08
 Enterobacter sp. ASC3 13.0 ± 0.2 18.5 ± 3.2 0.23 0.035 0.009 0.07
 Bacillus sp. ASC4 8.7 ± 0.3 33.5 ± 1.2 0.5 0.018 0.018 0.08
TOC 10 g/L
 Acinetobacter sp. ASC1 23.5 ± 0.1 54.6 ± 3.4 0.49 0.023 0.014 0.36
 Pseudomonas sp. ASC2 32.3 ± 0.3 61.8 ± 3.3 0.65 0.047 0.022 0.55
 Enterobacter sp. ASC3 33.1 ± 0.2 47.2 ± 2.2 0.57 0.042 0.01 0.43
 Bacillus sp. ASC4 13.2 ± 0.4 47.4 ± 1.5 0.51 0.022 0.017 0.17
TOC 20 g/L
 Acinetobacter sp. ASC1 27.3 ± 0.2 23.4 ± 2.7 0.31 0.023 0.014 0.18
 Pseudomonas sp. ASC2 24.2 ± 0.1 39.4 ± 1.6 0.58 0.044 0.03 0.27
 Enterobacter sp. ASC3 27.3 ± 0.2 30.0 ± 2.2 0.42 0.051 0.02 0.15
 Bacillus sp. ASC4 21.8 ± 0.5 33.8 ± 2.4 0.41 0.023 0.023 0.2

Cells were grown in production medium with a carbon to nitrogen ratio of 200 in batch cultivation