Table 3.
Results of TST, QFT-IT and T-SPOT.TB
| Author, Year | TST (cut-off stated in each study) | QFT-IT | T-SPOT.TB | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | TN | FP | FN | TP | TN | FP | FN | IND | TP | TN | FP | FN | IND | |
| Detjen et al. (2007) [27] | 28 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Domínguez et al. (2008) [28] | 9 | – | – | 0 | 6 | – | – | 3 | 0 | 6 | – | – | 1 | 2 |
| Kampmann et al. (2009) [29] | 21 | – | – | 3 | 20 | – | – | 3 | 2 | 14 | – | – | 9 | 1 |
| Lighter et al. (2009) [30] | 6 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / |
| Hansted et al. (2009) [31] | 23 | 18 | 34 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / | 23 | 47 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Bamford et al. (2010) [32] | 37 | – | – | 8 | 36 | – | – | 6 | 4 | 18 | – | – | 8 | 1 |
| Sun Lin et al. (2010) [33] | 11 | 36 | 15 | 7 | / | / | / | / | / | 15 | 48 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Tsolia et al. (2010) [34] | 11 | – | – | 2 | 11 | – | – | 0 | 2 | / | / | / | / | / |
| Cruz et al. (2011) [35] | 10 | – | – | 3 | / | / | / | / | / | 12 | – | – | 1 | 0 |
| Chiappini et al. (2012) [36] | 4 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 5 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / |
| Lodha et al. (2013) [37] | 115 | – | – | 13 | 102 | – | – | 21 | 5 | / | / | / | / | / |
| Blandinières et al. (2013) [38] | 18 | – | – | 5 | 16 | – | – | 7 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / |
| Jenum et al. (2014) [39] | 3 | 624 | 65 | 1 | 3 | 625 | 33 | 1 | 20 | / | / | / | / | / |
| Chiappini et al. (2014) [40] | 27 | – | – | 1 | 25 | 195 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 187 | 2 | 6 | 17 |
| Petrone et al. (2015) [41] | 3 | – | – | 3 | 3 | – | – | 2 | 0 | / | / | / | / | / |
TN true negatives, TP true positives, FN false negatives, FP false positives, IND indeterminate