Table 8.
Characteristics | Suraj Intervention | CMW Intervention | Control arm | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (N = 1995) (%) | Endline (N = 1095) (%) | p value | Baseline (N = 1435) (%) | Endline (N = 712) (%) | p value | Baseline (N = 2136) (%) | Endline (N = 1075) (%) | p value | |
Ever use of contraceptiona | |||||||||
Any method | 49.9 | 65.2 | <0.0001 | 30.2 | 41.9 | <0.0001 | 48.3 | 53.2 | 0.0088 |
Pills | 10.3 | 13.3 | 0.012 | 7 | 9.8 | 0.0238 | 8.6 | 10.3 | 0.1152 |
IUD | 5.3 | 12.1 | <0.0001 | 4.3 | 8.3 | 0.0002 | 5.8 | 5 | 0.3494 |
Injections | 12.3 | 15.2 | 0.0233 | 7.2 | 14.5 | <0.0001 | 10.1 | 12.1 | 0.0845 |
Condom | 23.3 | 23.2 | 0.9498 | 8.2 | 8.7 | 0.6936 | 19.6 | 21.1 | 0.3169 |
Implant | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.0793 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.0189 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.0265 |
Female Sterilization | 4.3 | 3.6 | 0.3452 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 0.1567 | 3.4 | 5 | 0.0278 |
Male Sterilization | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4652 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1799 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.0035 |
Traditional Methodb | 14.5 | 19.9 | 0.0001 | 7.4 | 12.1 | 0.0003 | 15.5 | 22.1 | <0.0001 |
Current use of contraceptivec | 34 | 47.7 | <0.0001 | 17.1 | 24.6 | <0.0001 | 26.9 | 35.2 | <0.0001 |
Any Modern method | 30 | 37.6 | <0.0001 | 14 | 20.1 | 0.0003 | 24.1 | 28.7 | 0.0048 |
Pills | 3.8 | 5.1 | 0.087 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 0.4355 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 0.2219 |
IUD | 3 | 8.3 | <0.0001 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 0.0078 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 0.8816 |
Injections | 6.3 | 6.7 | 0.6648 | 3.7 | 5.3 | 0.0829 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 0.5495 |
Condom | 13.8 | 13.5 | 0.8165 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 0.1493 | 9.6 | 11 | 0.2134 |
Implant | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3817 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.0066 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.7401 |
Female Sterilization | 2.9 | 3.4 | 0.4414 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 0.0368 | 2.9 | 4.5 | 0.0188 |
Male Sterilization | 0 | 0.2 | 0.1255 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.5533 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.3348 |
Traditional methodb | 3.9 | 10.2 | <0.0001 | 3 | 4.5 | 0.0749 | 2.8 | 6.5 | <0.0001 |
amultiple responses
bTraditional Methods include withdrawal, abstinence and Lactation Amenorrhea Method (LAM)
ccurrent contraceptive use was asked from all MWRA