Table 2.

Outcome of multiple comparisons for each time point for the latency to resume feeding

Comparison		Time point 1			Time point 2			Time point 3			Time point 4
Treatment 1	Treatment 2	χ2	P	P adja	χ2	P	P adja	χ2	P	P adja	χ2	P	P adja
0_0	1_0	0.48	0.9242	1	22.50	0.0001	0.0003	14.17	0.0027	0.0161	11.30	0.0102	0.0612
0_0	0_1	0.01	0.9997	1	12.26	0.0065	0.0392	9.68	0.0215	0.1292	4.63	0.2009	1.2051
0_0	1_1	13.11	0.0044	0.0265	30.80	<0.0001	<0.0001	42.95	<0.0001	<0.0001	54.11	<0.0001	<0.0001
0_1	1_0	0.45	0.9292	1	0.34	0.9515	1	0.01	0.9997	5.9984	0.73	0.8652	5.1911
1_0	1_1	8.60	0.0351	0.2103	1.68	0.6410	1	10.01	0.0185	0.1108	19.45	0.0002	0.0013
0_1	1_1	10.54	0.0145	0.0868	2.97	0.3961	1	8.73	0.0330	0.1983	23.97	<0.0001	0.0002

We conducted survival analysis including only 2 treatments at once. Significant P values are highlighted in bold. 0_0: Fish not infected by Schistocephalus solidus; 1_0: Fish singly infected on day 0; 0_1: Fish singly infected on day 31; 1_1: Fish sequentially infected on day 0 plus on day 31. If there were differences between treatments, treatment 1 is the one with the longer time to resume feeding within each comparison, that is, the more risk-averse fish.

^aAdjusted P values represent Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.