Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 16;6(8):2624–2651. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2077
Cynomys gunnisoni
Model ln L § ΔAIC Parametersφ
M0 – one ω −675.361 37.50 0.290
M1a – nearly neutral (ω 0  < 1, ω 1  = 1) −655.611 best * p 0  = 0.733, ω 0  = 0.034
M2a – positive selection (ω 0 < 1, ω 1 = 1, ω 2 > 1) −653.777 0.331 p0 = 0.805, p2 = 0.195,ω 0 = 0.073, ω 2 = 2.145
M7 – beta (p, q) −656.058 0.892 p = 0.017; q = 0.034
M8 – beta and ω (p, q, ωs > 1) −653.782 0.341 p0 = 0.806, (p1 = 0.194), p = 8.015, q = 99.0, ω = 2.155
Cynomys ludovicianus
Model ln L § ΔAIC Parametersφ
M0 – one ω −552.710 26.682 0.325
M1a – nearly neutral (ω 0 < 1, ω 1 = 1) −542.278 5.818 p0 = 0.654, ω 0 = 0.059
M2a – positive selection (ω 0  < 1, ω 1  = 1, ω 2  > 1) −539.369 best * p 0  = 0.631, p 2  = 0.091, ω 0  = 0.089, ω 2  = 13.813
M7 – beta (p, q) −542.612 6.487 p = 0.111; q = 0.171
M8 – beta and ω (p, q, ωs > 1) −539.275 −0.187 p0 = 0.905, (p1 = 0.095), p = 0.253, q = 0.502, ω = 12.803

Estimated proportions of sites (p x) evolving at corresponding estimated rates (ω x = d N/d S) are given in the parameters column.

Alternative models of codon evolution from PAML (Yang 1997, 2007).

§Log likelihood score.

φProportion of sites (p) evolving at corresponding rate (ω).

*Model of best fit.