Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Jan;19(1):111–119. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0516

Table 2.

HRs for sputum culture conversion from start of treatment for incident TB cases* and excess alcohol use by DOT vs. SAT

Total (n = 60 034) Total converted by 4 months n (%) Time to culture conversion, days, median [IQR] HR (95%CI) Adjusted HR§
All
 No excess alcohol use 46 925 43 311 (92.3) 43 [25–66] 1.23 (1.22–1.26) 1.20 (1.18–1.23)
 Excess alcohol use 12 512 11 082 (88.6) 54 [31–76] Reference Reference
SAT
 No excess alcohol use 3 392 2 907 (85.7) 45 [26–69] 1.14 (1.01–1.27) 1.11 (0.99–1.25)
 Excess alcohol use 308 255 (82.8) 50 [31–76] Reference Reference
DOT
 No excess alcohol use 30 041 27 751 (92.4) 43 [24–65] 1.27 (1.23–1.30) 1.22 (1.19–1.25)
 Excess alcohol use 8 887 7 878 (88.6) 54 [31–75] Reference Reference
*

Limited to US cases aged ≥15 years, 1997–2012, with culture positivity, confirmed susceptibility to isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol, no known resistance to pyrazinamide, alive at the time of diagnosis, started on four-drug regimen, had documentation of negative sputum, had valid documentation date of conversion, culture converted before stopping treatment, culture converted within 4 months, responded either ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to excess alcohol use.

Columns may not sum to 100% due to missing data.

Total with documented conversion.

§

Adjusted for race/ethnicity, sex, age and homelessness. Missing cases excluded from analysis.

HR = hazard ratio; TB = tuberculosis; IQR = interquartile range; CI = confidence interval; DOT = directly observed therapy; SAT =self-administered therapy.