Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 19;20:776–787. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1171-2

Table 2.

Distribution of community mobilization indicators among Female Sex Workers (FSWs), Andhra Pradesh, India, Behavioral Tracking Survey-I (2010) and II (2012)

Behavioral Tracking Survey
Community mobilization indicators 2010 (N = 1986) 2012 (N = 1973) p Value
Community collectivization
 Collective efficacy:(H) 89.0 (1768) 85.0 (1671) 0.000
  Work together to keep each other safe from harm 65.6 (1303) 68.4 (1349) 0.063
  Work together to increase condom usage 87.3 (1733) 81.3 (1603) 0.000
  Work together to speaking for sex workers rights 72.0 (1429) 71.4 (1406) 0.637
  Coming together for improving lives of sex workers 61.6 (1223) 72.9 (1437) 0.000
 Collective agency:(H) 50.7 (1006) 42.3 (835) 0.000
  Negotiated or stood up against police 45.0 (895) 43.8 (864) 0.447
  Negotiated or stood up against madam/broker 51.0 (1013) 40.1 (791) 0.000
  Negotiated or stood up against local goon 17.5 (348) 39.1 (771) 0.000
  Negotiated or stood up against client/regular partner/other partner 42.7 (849) 40.8 (803) 0.225
 Collective action:(H) 12.7 (253) 28.5 (563) 0.000
  Come together to demand/help for ration card 13.0 (258) 30.2 (595) 0.000
  Come together to demand/help for voter card 12.4 (247) 29.3 (577) 0.000
  Come together to demand/help for bank account 13.3 (264) 28.4 (560) 0.000
  Come together to demand/help for free education for children 17.7 (351) 28.0 (553) 0.000
  Come together to demand/help for health insurance 20.7 (412) 28.0 (551) 0.000
  Come together to demand/help for representation govt. forum 5.2 (103) 19.9 (392) 0.000
  Come together to demand/help for better health services from the govt. 15.2 (302) 30.2 (594) 0.000
 Potential mediators
  Self-efficacy for condom use with clients 63.4 (1260) 72.5 (1430) 0.000
  Self-efficacy for condom use with regular partners 36.2 (716) 43.3 (852) 0.000
 Outcome indicators
  CCU with occasional clients 72.3 (1436) 85.3 (1682) 0.000
  CCU with regular clients 64.3 (1260) 76.0 (1478) 0.000
  CCU with regular partners 15.3 (273) 18.5 (284) 0.007
  CCU non regular nonpaying partners 39.0 (187) 57.0 (182) 0.000

CCU consistent condom use; p Values were obtained by testing the significance of differences in percentages (Z-test) between groups