Table 4.
Effects of collectivization and mediators on outcome indicators (consistent condom use with clients) among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, BTS-I (2010) and BTS-II (2012)
| BTS I (2010) | BTS II (2012) | Time × Collectivization | BTS I (2010) | BTS II (2012) | Time × Collectivization | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collectivisation indicators and corresponding mediators | AOR for collectivizationa
(95 % CI) |
AOR for collectivizationa
(95 % CI) |
AOR for collectivizationa
(95 % CI) |
p-value | AOR for mediatorsb
(95 % CI) |
AOR for mediatorsb
(95 % CI) |
AOR for mediatorsb
(95 % CI) |
p-value |
| Outcome indicators | ||||||||
| Consistent condom use with occasional clients | ||||||||
| Collective efficacy and corresponding mediators self-efficacy for condom use with commercial partners | ||||||||
| Low | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||
| High | 0.9 (0.7–1.4) | 6.3 (4.5–8.9) | 6.8 (4.3–11.0) | 0.000 | 3.1 (2.3–4.2) | 1.9 (1.4–2.6) | 0.7 (0.4–1.0) | 0.061 |
| Collective agency and corresponding mediators self-efficacy for condom use with commercial partners | ||||||||
| Low | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||
| High | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | 8.0 (4.7–13.6) | 14.9 (8.2–27.0) | 0.000 | 3.3 (2.4–4.4) | 1.2 (0.9–1.7) | 0.4 (0.3–0.6) | 0.000 |
| Collective action and corresponding mediators self-efficacy for condom use with commercial partners | ||||||||
| Low | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||
| High | 1.2 (0.8–1.9) | 1.6 (1.1–2.4) | 1.4 (0.8–2.4) | 0.437 | 3.1 (2.3–4.2) | 2.0 (1.5–2.6) | 0.7 (0.5–1.1) | 0.069 |
| Consistent condom use with regular clients | ||||||||
| Collective efficacy and corresponding mediators self-efficacy for condom use with commercial partners | ||||||||
| Low | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||
| High | 1.2 (0.9–1.6) | 3.5 (2.6–4.8) | 3.1 (2.0–4.9) | 0.001 | 3.1 (2.3–4.1) | 2.0 (1.5–2.6) | 0.7 (0.5–1.0) | 0.073 |
| Collective agency and corresponding mediators self-efficacy for condom use with commercial partners | ||||||||
| Low | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||
| High | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | 10.2 (6.9–15.2) | 20.1 (12.6–32.3) | 0.000 | 3.2 (2.4–4.3) | 1.2 (0.9–1.7) | 0.4 (0.3–0.6) | 0.000 |
| Collective action and corresponding mediators self-efficacy for condom use with commercial partners | ||||||||
| Low | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||
| High | 1.1 (0.7–1.6) | 2.0 (1.5–2.7) | 1.9 (1.2–3.1) | 0.001 | 3.0 (2.3–4.0) | 2.0 (1.6–2.7) | 0.7 (0.5–1.1) | 0.583 |
AOR adjusted odds ratios, Ref reference variable, CI confidence intervals
a Odds ratios were adjusted for the corresponding mediators
b Odds ratios were adjusted for the corresponding collectivization indicators with the socio-demographic characteristics: age of FSW; formal schooling (yes, no); marital status (currently married, not currently married); source of income other than sex work (yes, no); place of solicitation for sex work (home, public places, brothel/lodges); visited any place for sex work in past 2 years (yes, no); duration of sex work in years (entered as continuous variable)