Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 17;6:10.3402/snp.v6.29672. doi: 10.3402/snp.v6.29672

Table 2.

Results of the statistical analyses for clinical scales, visual analogue scales and Ekman 60 faces test scores

Effects

Group Time Group×time



Variables F(1,18) p F(1,18) p F(1,18)/U p
Clinical scales
 BDIb U=41.00 0.330
 HDRSa 0.590 0.452 0.100 0.755 F=0.900 0.355
 MASa 0.171 0.685 0.002 0.969 F=0.456 0.510
Visual analogue scales
 Anxietya 0.366 0.553 0.01 0.921 F=2.30 0.150
 Sadnessb U=44.50 0.670
 Angera 0.091 0.767 0.005 0.944 F=4.22 0.056
 Happinessa 2.761 0.114 0.000 1.000 F=0.24 0.630
 Serenitya 4.261 0.054 0.017 0.898 F=0.297 0.593
 Nervousnessa 0.239 0.631 0.001 0.972 F=0.902 0.355
 Adaptation to daily lifeb U=22.50 0.036
The Ekman 60 faces test
 Angry facesb U=30.000 0.111
 Disgust facesb U=42.500 0.544
 Fear facesa 0.082 0.778 7.945 0.011 F=0.124 0.729
 Happiness facesb U=49.000 0.914
 Sadness facesb U=47.000 0.815
 Surprise facesa 1.554 0.228 2.089 0.166 F=0.026 0.874
 All faces recognitiona 0.011 0.918 7.050 0.016 F=0.026 0.873
a

When variables met normality and equality of variances assumptions, a mixed-design ANOVA was performed: F and p values are reported for main effects (group and time) and interaction effect.

b

When variables did not meet these assumptions, Mann–Whitney's test compared delta scores (before rTMS minus after rTMS) between the two groups: U and p values are reported in the last column. Bolded values indicate p<0.05.