Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 4;47(5):588–592. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30008-2

Table 3.

Evaluation of the bear hug semiological test, taking pain and weakness as positive (results 1 + 2) or weakness alone as positive (result 2). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated.

Bear hug (pain and weakness) Bear hug (weakness alone)
Sen (%) 75 12,5

Spec (%) 56 92

PPV (%) 62 60

NPV (%) 70 52

Accuracy (%) 65 53

Sen: sensitivity; Spec: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.