Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 19;9:178. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1986-6

Table 3.

Bivariate association of family/community level variables and current domestic violence (n = 355)

Characteristics Current domestic violence p value Crude odds ratio
(95 % CI)
Yes No
Family size
 >5 members 53 (26.2) 149 (73.8) 0.107 1.521 (0.9122.537)
 ≤5 members 29 (19.0) 124 (81.0) Ref.
Duration of marriage (years)
 >10 56 (24.9) 169 (75.1) 0.292 1.325 (0.7842.242)
 ≤10 26 (20.0) 104 (80.0) Ref.
Marriage type
 Love marriage 31 (27.2) 83 (72.8) 0.208 1.391 (0.8312.330)
 Arrange marriage 51 (21.2) 190 (78.8) Ref.
Family Income (year)
 Enough for <1 48 (33.8) 94 (66.2) <0.001 2.688 (1.6224.456)
 Enough for 1 34 (16.0) 179 (84.0) Ref.
Husband controlling behavior
 Yes 44 (59.5) 30 (40.5) <0.001 9.379 (5.27016.691)
 No 38 (13.5) 243 (86.5) Ref.
Caste/ethnicity
 Dalits 28 (40.0) 42 (60.0) 0.002 3.11 (1.4186.826)
 Disadvantaged Janajatis 37 (20.0) 148 (80.0) 1.166 (0.5682.397)
Advantaged Janajatis 5 (15.6) 27 (84.4) 0.864 (0.2762.702)
Upper caste 12 (17.6) 56 (82.4) Ref.
Involved in polygamous relationship
 Yes 12 (44.4) 15 (55.6) 0.006 2.949 (1.320–6.587)
 No 70 (21.3) 258 (78.7) Ref.

p value and COR in italics indicates significant

Number in parenthesis indicates percentages