Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jan 26;25(4):883–893. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.12.029

Table 4.

Adjusted Associations of PTH with Prospective WMH Volume Change and Risk of Incident Infarcts over follow-up from ARIC visit 3 (1993–1994) to ARIC Brain MRI visit (2004–2006).

Per 1 unit increase
in log(PTH)
PTH≥65 vs <65
Over all No. 1703 204 (12.0%)
WMH volume change, cm3 β coef (95% CI) β coef (95% CI)
    Model 1 0.88 (−1.43, 3.19) 1.48 (−0.56, 3.53)
    Model 2 1.09 (−1.27, 3.44) 1.39 (−0.73, 3.51)
    Model 3 0.77 (−1.55, 3.09) 0.92 (−1.21, 3.04)
    Model 4 1.21 (−1.31, 3.73) 1.17 (−0.90, 3.24)
P-interaction for race (Model 2) P=0.32 P=0.55
Incident infarcts (≥3 mm) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
    Model 1 1.53 (1.01, 2.31) 1.52 (1.05, 2.19)
    Model 2 1.50 (0.97, 2.30) 1.42 (0.97, 2.06)
    Model 3 1.45 (0.90, 2.35) 1.30 (0.86, 1.98)
    Model 4 1.61 (0.95, 2.72) 1.37 (0.88, 2.13)
P-interaction for race (Model 2) P=0.06 P=0.52

Model 1 (demographic variables): age, sex, race

Model 2 (demographic + behavioral and socioeconomic variables): Model 1 + education, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol drinking, physical activity

Model 3 (demographic + behavioral and socioeconomic + comorbidities): Model 2 + systolic and diastolic blood pressure, use of hypertension medication, diabetes, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, cholesterol lowering medications, and estimated glomerular filtration rate

Model 4: (demographic + behavioral and socioeconomic + comorbidities + mediators): Model 3 + 25(OH)D, calcium, phosphorus