Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 30;39:181–191. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9681-y

Table 4.

Results of multivariate mixed models of covariance–a main depressive latent class effect

Chronic depression
n = 49 (1)
Rising depression
n = 121 (2)
Low depression
n = 30 (3)
Between-subject effecta
T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 F valueb
M (SD)
 Negative appraisalc,d 29.73 (6.66) 28.87 (7.04) 26.30 (8.04) 26.82 (6.96) 23.05 (7.55) 20.78 (8.07) 24.62 (7.63) 21.47 (8.99) 18.76 (7.02) 4.07*
(1) > (2), (3)
 Positive appraisal 22.37 (3.59) 21.82 (3.85) 21.52 (4.57) 21.58 (3.88) 22.43 (3.84) 22.72 (3.77) 22.03 (4.57) 22.73 (4.52) 21.53 (5.29) .16
 Problem coping 27.67 (5.52) 27.07 (4.84) 25.74 (5.15) 27.44 (5.07) 26.76 (5.22) 25.65 (5.26) 26.95 (6.27) 27.30 (6.17) 25.57 (5.88) .04
 Emotion copinge 20.98 (5.69) 19.61 (4.34) 20.06 (4.26) 17.75 (5.90) 15.44 (5.48) 14.97 (5.46) 14.40 (6.25) 12.37 (4.71) 11.40 (5.02) 24.48***
(1) > (2) > (3)
 Avoidance coping 15.43 (5.29) 14.56 (4.45) 13.74 (5.19) 14.39 (4.93) 13.90 (4.41) 13.54 (4.17) 14.27 (4.60) 13.30 (5.34) 12.57 (4.82) .91

* p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001

aPairwise comparisons with Bonferroni’s test. b df = 2;196

Used covariates (only those which turned out to be significant for dependent variables): c age, d NYHA in T4, e sex