Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 11;6(3):e010169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010169

Table 3.

Linear regression between contextual variables and fourth year performance

Variable SD B 95% CI Sig
School type
 State comprehensive (reference) 74.25 2.43
 Sixth form college 74.31 2.46 −0.07 −0.64 to 0.50 0.814
 State other 74.72 1.92 0.35 −0.53 to 1.24 0.435
 State grammar 73.92 2.58 −0.45 −1.01 to 0.11 0.112
 Independent school 73.56 2.46 −0.82 −1.38 to 0.25 <0.001
Ethnicity
 White (reference) 74.41 2.33
 Black 74.40 2.34 −0.012 −2.12 to 2.09 0.991
 Asian 72.97 2.51 −1.44 −2.03 to 0.861 <0.001
 Chinese 71.80 3.00 −2.61 −4.70 to 1.31 <0.001
 Other 73.92 2.50 −0.50 −1.38 to 0.387 0.271
Sex
 Female (reference) 74.33 2.31
 Male 73.76 2.66 −0.57 −0.99 to 0.15 <0.01
Continuous variables
 School performance* 0.005 −0.16 to 0.01 0.404
 Socioeconomic status (Index of Multiple Deprivation; percentile†) 0.004 −0.003 to 0.011 0.280
 UCAS Tariff Points 0.01 0.01 to 0.02 <0.001
 Polar 3‡ 0.06 −0.05 to 0.27 0.185
Model parameters (for UCAS Tariff Points)
 B0 69.38
 R 0.18
 R2 0.03

*School performance-based on the percentage of students achieving 3 A-levels or equivalent.

†Defined by percentiles of Index of Multiple Deprivation (1=Most deprived to =100 Least deprived).

‡ Neighbourhood higher education participation (1=Lowest Participation to 5=Highest Participation).