Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2015 Oct 26;2016(3):6800812. doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2015.2493961

The Role of Laser Speckle Imaging in Port-Wine Stain Research: Recent Advances and Opportunities

Bernard Choi 1, Wenbin Tan 2, Wangcun Jia 3, Sean M White 4, Wesley J Moy 5, Bruce Y Yang 6, Jiang Zhu, Zhongping Chen, Kristen M Kelly 7, J Stuart Nelson 8
PMCID: PMC4800318  NIHMSID: NIHMS758587  PMID: 27013846

Abstract

Here, we review our current knowledge on the etiology and treatment of port-wine stain (PWS) birthmarks. Current treatment options have significant limitations in terms of efficacy. With the combination of 1) a suitable preclinical microvascular model, 2) laser speckle imaging (LSI) to evaluate blood-flow dynamics, and 3) a longitudinal experimental design, rapid preclinical assessment of new phototherapies can be translated from the lab to the clinic. The combination of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and pulsed-dye laser (PDL) irradiation achieves a synergistic effect that reduces the required radiant exposures of the individual phototherapies to achieve persistent vascular shutdown. PDL combined with anti-angiogenic agents is a promising strategy to achieve persistent vascular shutdown by preventing reformation and reperfusion of photocoagulated blood vessels. Integration of LSI into the clinical workflow may lead to surgical image guidance that maximizes acute photocoagulation, is expected to improve PWS therapeutic outcome. Continued integration of noninvasive optical imaging technologies and biochemical analysis collectively are expected to lead to more robust treatment strategies.

Index Terms: anti-angiogenic, biomedical optical imaging, biophotonics, dorsal window chamber, image-guided surgery, intravital imaging, surgery

I. Introduction

In an estimated three children per 1000 live births (~400,000 per year) [1], hypervascular skin lesions known as port-wine stain (PWS) birthmarks develop. They are due purportedly to irregularities in neural development and genetic mutations. Since the seminal publication by Anderson and Parrish on selective photothermolysis [2], photothermal therapy of PWS birthmarks has become a classic example of how judicious use of wavelength and pulse duration can result in selective photo-induced damage to subsurface targets. Here, we review our current understanding of PWS, including their etiology and microscopic architecture; optical methods used currently in the clinic for treatment; and the critical role that laser speckle imaging (LSI) can play both in rapid evaluation of new phototherapy protocols and intraoperative monitoring and guidance during laser surgery. We conclude with recommendations for future research directions.

II. PORT-WINE STAIN ETIOLOGY

The cause and origin of PWS remain incompletely understood. Researchers have proposed two central hypotheses to describe the pathogenesis of PWS birthmarks. One hypothesis is that axonal denervation may contribute to the development of PWS birthmarks. Supporting evidence includes: 1) PWS typically occur in regions that normally are innervated by certain axonal branches (i.e., trigeminal nerve [3]; and 2) nerve fiber density is significantly decreased in PWS as compared to normal skin [4].

A second hypothesis proposes that genetic mutations may contribute to formation of PWS. Shirley et al. [5] discovered that sporadic somatic guanine nucleotide-binding protein, G alpha subunit q (GNAQ) mutation (R183Q), was found in PWS with an average mutation frequency lower than 5%. However, the specific cell-type distributions of this mutation and its pathogenic roles in PWS development remain unknown. Mutation(s) in a single gene alone may be insufficient to cause PWS, but may contribute its pathogenesis in combination with other genetic alterations.

Many signaling pathways are aberrantly activated in PWS. We have identified an activation profile of various kinases during different stages of PWS progression, including (1) c-Jun N-terminal kinases and extracellular signal regulated kinases in infantile to nodular PWS, which may contribute to both the pathogenesis and progressive development of PWS; (2) AKT and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases, which may be involved in the progressive dilation of PWS blood vessels; and (3) phosphoinositide phospholipase C γ subunit, which may lead to the formation of nodules [6]. Furthermore, PWS have elevated expression of both vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor subtype 2 (VEGFR-2) [7].

In summary, aberrant activation of signaling pathways in PWS may be a result of mutations of GNAQ, or VEGFR-2 activation, or some combination thereof.

II. APPEARANCE AND MICROSCOPIC ARCHITECTURE OF A PORT-WINE STAIN

PWS involves enlargement and an increased density of capillaries and post-capillary venules. Histopathological studies (Fig. 1a) of PWS show an abnormal plexus of dilated blood vessels located in the dermis [8]. The skin contains clusters of blood vessels with diameters ranging primarily between 10 to 50μm (Fig. 1a) [9], although larger (200μm) diameter vessels are observed in histological sections [8].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Representative (a) three-dimensional image of port-wine stain (PWS) skin. The epidermis (brown) and general dermal structure (red) are similar for normal and PWS skin. The image is a digital representation of 70 adjacent histological sections. Adapted with permission from REF. 9. (b) Example of progression of a PWS over four decades of life. PWS birthmarks tend to darken in color and become hypertrophic, as evidenced in this case by nodule formation. Adapted with permission from REF. 11.

PWS are well demarcated and grow proportionately in surface area with age. In infants and young children, PWS are flat red to pink macules (Fig. 1b). However, PWS tend to darken progressively to deep red or purple (Fig. 1b) and, by adult age, often become raised as a result of the development of vascular papules or nodules on the skin surface, which can often bleed spontaneously with incidental trauma [10, 11]. These changes in color and contour are attributed to progressive dilatation of the abnormal dermal vascular plexus.

III. STANDARD TREATMENT: PHOTOTHERMAL THERAPY

A. Selective Photothermolysis

In 1983, Anderson and Parrish [2] made the seminal observation that judicious selection of laser parameters can result in precise targeting of subsurface structures, such as hemoglobin in blood. As a direct result, the treatment of PWS became one of the earliest successful applications of laser therapy. For PWS laser treatment, the goal is selective photocoagulation of the subsurface vessels, with subsequent replacement of the damaged vessels with normal microvasculature (Fig. 2a). Laser light targets the optical absorbers oxyhemoglobin and de-oxyhemoglobin in the blood vessels. The absorbers convert the optical energy to heat, resulting ideally in thermal damage and complete thrombosis in the targeted vessels [12, 13]. To take advantage of the selective photothermolysis principles outlined by Anderson and Parrish, medical laser technology has evolved towards use of longer wavelengths, from 577 nm [14, 15] to 585 nm [16] and to 595 nm [17]; and longer pulse durations from 0.5 to 1.5ms [18].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(a) Selective photothermolysis is the governing principle clinicians to use to treat port-wine stain (PWS) birthmarks. Selective absorption of the optical energy in the superficial PWS vasculature results in generation of heat energy, leading to local temperature elevation and, with sufficiently high temperatures, photocoagulation of blood constituents and/or the walls of the microvasculature. Complete and selective acute photocoagulation of the vessel is considered to be a prerequisite of subsequent vessel removal during wound healing. Adapted with permission from REF. 13. (b) Example of a good treatment outcome. Photographs were taken (left) before pulsed-dye laser (PDL) treatment and (right) after six laser treatments. Based on visible reflectance spectroscopy measurements, the PWS blanching was 80%. (c) Example of a poor treatment outcome. Photographs were taken (left) before PDL treatment and (right) after three laser treatments. Quantitative analysis demonstrates that the PWS birthmark actually darkened in color.

The approach of pulsed-dye laser (PDL) therapy is based on the premise that acute, selective photocoagulation of PWS vessels results in vascular remodeling that replaces photocoagulated vessels with normal-sized capillaries (Fig. 2a). The maximum permissible radiant exposure is limited due to the competitive absorption by epidermal melanin. Photocoagulation by PDL therapy is limited primarily by the optical scattering of skin to a maximum depth of ~2 mm. Recent improvements in PDL technology have included incorporation of cryogen spray cooling in an effort to reduce epidermal damage and pain and permit the use of higher radiant exposures [19].

Since the 1980s, clinicians have used PDLs emitting yellow light (577–595nm) devices. Alternate light sources include the frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser (532nm) and broadband intense pulsed light sources. To achieve deeper penetration of light to treat hypertrophic or nodular PWS birthmarks, the alexandrite laser (755 nm) can be used [20].

Consistent removal of PWS in children is expected to eliminate the psychosocial damage these lesions inflict, and will significantly and positively impact the life of affected individuals and their families. Previous studies have demonstrated that early treatment of PWS generally achieves better outcomes (i.e. greater lightening in a shorter period of time [21, 22] than treatment at adult ages. Improved results in infants are likely due to the presence of PWS vessel diameters that are more amenable to photocoagulation and thinner overall lesions.

B. Current State of Pulsed-Dye Laser Therapy

The PDL is the standard of care for the treatment of PWS throughout the world (Fig. 2b). However, current treatment options have significant limitations in terms of efficacy and risk [23, 24]. When treated by PDL, PWS often become lighter in color, but patients typically require multiple treatments (15+ to obtain the optimal therapeutic result in terms of lesion fading [25]). When general anesthesia is used, treatments can cost upwards of $2000 per session.

Even with numerous treatment sessions, complete removal often is not achieved. Patients and physicians are often frustrated as some lesions do not lighten with treatment (Fig. 2c) and PWS recurrence is common. A large population of patients with PWS responds poorly to PDL treatment, with a range of 12 to 85% of patients achieving less than 50% clearance, regardless of the treatment modality [2629]. Huikeshoven et al. [30] published a 10-year follow up on 51 patients who had undergone PDL treatment for PWS. Using objective skin color measurements, they reported significant redarkening of PWS following an initial course of PDL therapy (although the PWS remained significantly lighter than before treatment). Furthermore, only 59% of patients were satisfied with the overall treatment result.

Several factors that play a primary role in limiting PDL treatment efficacy have been identified. First, competitive absorption of therapeutic laser light by epidermal melanin reduces the light dosage reaching the targeted subsurface vessels. This is particularly a problem in patients with darker skin types. Second, PDL therapy is capable of inducing acute photocoagulation within intermediate-sized vessels greater than 20μm in diameter, but small superficial vessels remain difficult to photocoagulate due to the rapid heat diffusion from these vessels into the perivascular tissue [31]. Finally, revascularization may occur as a result of neovascularization and reperfusion of partially damaged vessels [13, 27, 32]. Treatment response may depend on the degree of innervation and microvascular density [4]. We and other research groups [3343] have reported on potential optimization of treatment parameter selection (i.e., wavelength, spot size, pulse duration, radiant exposure) on an individual treatment basis. However, due to the considerable heterogeneity of PWS vascular architecture and lack of current knowledge on how extracted skin characteristics can be used to guide treatment parameter selection, this premise remains difficult to test and impractical to perform in the clinic.

IV. DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TREATMENT APPROACHES

During the last 20 years, PWS treatment outcomes have remained largely unchanged [44]. To reduce the financial burden and potential risks of repeated treatments under general anesthesia, there is a need for innovative methods to maximize the reduction in PWS redness per treatment session. Without addressing this need, the efficacy of PWS laser therapy will remain variable, because protocols will remain based primarily on the impression and overall experience of the treating physician. To enhance PWS therapeutic outcome, we focus our research efforts along three themes:

  1. Develop new strategies to increase prevalence of acute photocoagulation

  2. Modulate biological response to phototherapy. Reformation and reperfusion of PWS blood vessels following therapy is a barrier that must be overcome to achieve improved therapeutic outcome after laser treatment [12, 32, 45, 46]

  3. Develop imaging approaches to provide intraoperative feedback during phototherapy

A. Animal Model

Extensive evaluation and optimization of new approaches to therapy, requires use of an animal model. Currently, a model bearing a lesion identical to a PWS, does not exist. Previous studies used the rooster comb [4749] and chick chorioallantoic membrane [18, 5052] models as a surrogate for PWS vasculature. For our recent studies, we selected the rodent dorsal window chamber model (Fig. 3a) based on extensive evaluation and use of which revealed the following important criteria: 1) The size of blood vessels in the dorsal window chamber is similar to that observed in PWS skin, 2) the dorsal window chamber model is an established method for microvascular evaluation, and 3) studies utilizing this method for PWS research have demonstrated correlation with studies on in-vivo PWS skin. Detailed protocols [53, 54] describe the materials and surgical procedures involved with the window chamber.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(a) Rodent dorsal window chamber model used for preclinical evaluation of phototherapies. (b) (Left) Rodent dorsal window chamber under (top) broadband illumination and (bottom) 633-nm HeNe laser illumination. (Right) In regions with blood flow, the speckle pattern has low contrast, whereas in surrounding regions the pattern has high contrast.

The size and depth of blood vessels in the dorsal window chamber are similar to that observed in PWS skin. Barsky et al. [8] analyzed biopsies from 100 PWS patients and determined the mean vessel depth to be 460μm. With further analysis of this data, we determined that mean PWS vessel diameters range between 50 and 75 μm and the blood volume fraction varied from 2 to 8% [41]. In comparison, the depth (~500 μm) of the subdermal vascular network of the hamster dorsal window chamber is within ~10% of the mean PWS vessel depth. Diameters of vessels in the window chamber range typically between 10 to 120μm, and the blood fraction of analyzed window chambers is between 3 to 6%. Collectively, these physical characteristics of window chamber microvasculature compare favorably with those found in PWS skin

B. Laser Speckle Imaging of Blood-Flow Dynamics

To characterize longitudinally the microcirculation of the dorsal window chamber, intravital microscopy is typically used [5558]. This method provides invaluable information on the microvasculature, but its use is limited largely to study only a small subregion of the window chamber. Here, we describe use of laser speckle imaging (LSI), a flexible, wide-field optical imaging approach that we have used extensively to image both the dorsal window chamber and subjects with PWS.

Several excellent descriptions of LSI exist in the literature [5962]. Here, we summarize only the most salient points. With illumination of an object with coherent light and imaging of the remitted light with a camera, a speckle pattern is observed (Fig. 3b). If the camera exposure is sufficiently short, the velocity distribution in the field will be mapped on the photograph as variations in speckle contrast (Fig. 3b). In their seminal paper on LSI, Fercher and Briers [63] derived a speckle contrast imaging equation, which since has been corrected to [64]:

σsI=[βexp(-2T/τc)-1+2T/τc2(T/τc)2]1/2 (1)

where σs(T) and <I> are the local standard deviation and mean, respectively, of the speckle pattern collected over exposure time T [s], β is a term that accounts for correlation loss due to spatial sampling of the speckle pattern and polarization, and τc is the speckle correlation time [s]. Thompson et al. [65] presented modeling and experimental data that suggests the importance of β for LSI analysis.

Various methods can be used to estimate τc from measurements of K, including use of look-up tables. Ramirez-San-Juan et al. [66] and Cheng and Duong [67] derived a simplified speckle imaging equation for contrast values between 0 and 0.5:

τc=2TK2 (2)

The simplicity of (2) facilitates rapid calculation of τc from knowledge of T and measurement of K.

C. Need for Long-Term Monitoring of the Microcirculation

With selective photothermolysis, the target short-term response is acute photocoagulation and substantial reduction in blood flow. The desired long-term response is substantial vascular remodeling within the region. A poor response is associated either with removal of the coagulum, leading to restoration of blood flow, or integration of the coagulum into the restructured vessel lumen [12, 13]. To study the preclinical efficacy of new therapeutic approaches, the dorsal window chamber is an effective model. With use of common exposure times (1–10 ms), our in-vitro blood flow phantom data [68] demonstrate a linear response range spanning low-flow conditions (i.e., capillaries) and flow in arterioles and venules, which are the primary blood vessels of interest in the rodent dorsal window chamber model.

We have demonstrated that the short-term (<24h) microvascular response to light-based therapeutic intervention differs considerably from the long-term response (Fig. 4a) [32]. In the absence of complete acute photocoagulation of the irradiated vessels with PDL, the region of interest remains perfused. This is in agreement with seminal clinical observations [24, 6972].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(a) Long-term monitoring of irradiated blood vessels is essential for assessment of the degree of photoinjury to targeted vessels. Wide-field color reflectance images (top row) and corresponding Speckle Flow Index (SFI) images (bottom row) were acquired after two arteriole-venule pairs (dashed circles in “Before” image) were irradiated with simultaneous 532 and 1064 nm laser pulses. In the absence of complete vascular shutdown, restoration of blood flow is observed, in a strikingly similar architecture to that observed in the “Before” image. Color reflectance image dimensions (H × V): 13 × 10 mm2, SFI image dimensions: 9 × 7 mm2. Adapted with permission from REF. 32. (b) Combined NPe6-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) and pulsed dye laser (PDL) irradiation induces persistent vascular shutdown at reduced individual radiant exposures. (Top) SFI images collected before phototherapy, after PDT, after ensuing PDL irradiation, and at seven days post-irradiation. (Bottom) Combined with a fixed PDL radiant exposure of 6J/cm2, the required characteristic PDT radiant exposure to achieve persistent vascular shutdown, decreased from 85J/cm2 to 45J/cm2. Reprinted with permission from REF. 100.

With the window chamber, we set out to develop new phototherapies to achieve persistent vascular shutdown. Persistent vascular shutdown is defined as a lack of blood flow in the targeted blood vessel or in the entire window chamber, at a specified time point after phototherapy. To this end, we have studied the ability of two new approaches to achieve this level of shutdown: 1) combined photodynamic and photothermal therapies; and 2) photochemotherapy.

D. Approach #1: Combined Phototherapies

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves use of a CW light source to activate an otherwise harmless photosensitizer [73]. Since the low optical powers (typically mW) associated with PDT typically are insufficient to cause photothermal injury to the epidermis, patients with all skin types can be treated, although darker skin types may require longer light exposure times to achieve the desired therapeutic effect [74]. PDL therapy tends to spare small (7 to 20μm diameter) blood vessels [31], while PDT can photocoagulate vessels of all sizes. With PDT, vascular injury can accumulate at progressively deeper regions as exposure time is increased.

Nearly all published data involving PDT of PWS are from studies conducted in China using either photocarcinorin (PSD-007) or hemoporfin as the photosensitizer [7585]. Data from large-scale clinical studies suggest that PDT can achieve good treatment outcomes [79, 86]. Zhang et al. [80] report that PDT treats pink PWS birthmarks better than PDL therapy, although their comparison involves use of PDL treatment without cryogen spray cooling. However, this clinical outcome was associated with undesirable aspects of the treatment protocol, including the reported photosensitivity period of four to eight weeks; treatment sessions greater than one hour in duration; and adverse side effects in pediatric patients including scarring and skin necrosis [75, 80, 87]. Furthermore, similar to PDL therapy, complete clearance of PWS birthmarks is difficult to achieve, even with multiple PDT sessions [75, 77]. Hence, further study of PDT as an alternate treatment to PDL therapy is warranted.

We first studied the efficacy of Benzoporphryin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD) as a photosensitizer. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved by BPD for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration, skin carcinoma, and brain tumors. With a series of preclinical studies [8891], we demonstrated promising results with the combination of BPD-mediated PDT combined with PDL irradiation. We then initiated clinical translation of the protocol in a Phase I FDA approved trial of PDT+PDL for treatment of PWS [92] and demonstrated that PDT+PDL is more effective for selective removal of cutaneous microvasculature, as compared to PDL alone.

Based on promising preclinical data [93], we evaluated talaporfin sodium (NPe6) as a candidate photosensitizer in treatment of PWS. NPe6 has proven selective vascular effects in preclinical studies, an acceptable photosensitivity period of five to seven days, and a positive safety profile [9497]. We selected a light source to target a secondary absorption peak of 664nm [98].

We first studied NPe6-mediated PDT. With dose-response analysis, we quantified a characteristic radiant exposure (RE50/7) capable of achieving persistent vascular shutdown at day 7 after phototherapy [99]. We then combined NPe6-mediated PDT with PDL therapy, with either PDT or PDL performed at radiant exposures below their respective RE50/7values of 85 and 7.1J/cm2 [100]. We determined that RE50/7 for NPe6-mediated PDT decreased substantially when combined with PDL (Fig. 4b). Initial analysis of the data suggests that PDT and PDL act in a synergistic manner, although the mechanism of action remains unknown and is a topic of further study.

Collectively, our preclinical and clinical observations on PDT+PDL suggest that complete, persistent vascular shutdown can be achieved with reduced light doses, which is an important first step towards enhancing PWS therapeutic outcome. Achieving this outcome was accelerated with longitudinal optical imaging of a suitable preclinical model. A Phase I clinical study evaluating this approach is underway.

E. Approach #2: Photochemotherapy

Angiogenesis associated with the normal wound healing response after laser exposure can cause regeneration of coagulated blood vessels [32, 45, 46, 101]. PDL treatment of PWS causes acute hypoxia due to intense damage to blood vessels. Local hypoxia leads to upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) and subsequent transcription of numerous pro-angiogenic genes, including VEGF [102, 103]. VEGF is the predominant growth factor that regulates angiogenesis pathways by signaling via VEGFR-2 [104]. We previously studied the use of Imiquimod, an antiangiogenic agent approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of external genital warts, superficial basal cell carcinoma, and actinic keratosis, in combination with PDL therapy [105, 106]. The preliminary data suggest that the combined PDL+imiquimod protocol leads to a higher degree of blanching than PDL alone, although some regression in color change was observed. Further clinical trials are warranted to assess safety and efficacy of this approach.

Activation of VEGFR-2 also leads to activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway [102, 107109]. mTOR can phosphorylate 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) [110] and S6 kinase [111, 112], which in turn mediates efficient cap-dependent translation initiation and subsequent regeneration and reperfusion of injured blood vessels.

We hypothesize that the combination of PDL therapy and rapamycin-mediated inhibition of mTOR signaling may enhance PWS therapeutic outcome using photochemotherapy. Recent studies demonstrate the potential of FDA-approved rapamycin [113, 114] as an anti-angiogenic agent. Rapamycin 1) decreases VEGF production, 2) mitigates the response of vascular endothelial cells to stimulation by VEGF [115, 116], 3) inhibits upstream Akt-induced signaling in endothelial cells [117], and 4) reduces the angiogenic effects of hypoxia [118, 119].

Based on these findings, we performed preclinical evaluation of photochemotherapy on the dorsal window chamber model and used LSI to monitor the treatment response [101]. When blood vessels were exposed to laser irradiation combined with daily 1% topical rapamycin for 14 days, we observed minimal regeneration of blood vessels (Fig. 5a). Even after rapamycin application was discontinued, we did not observe any revascularization during the one-month monitoring period.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Combined pulsed dye laser (PDL) therapy with Rapamycin induces persistent vascular shutdown. (a) Preclinical evaluation of window chamber treated with targeted PDL pulses in conjunction with 1% topical rapamycin application. Acute shutdown of the targeted vessels was observed and persisted through Day 14. Adapted with permission from REF. 101). (b) First clinical demonstration of photochemotherapy for treatment of port-wine stain birthmarks. At test sites treated with PDL alone, near-complete re-perfusion was observed 13 months after treatment. When PDL was used in conjunction with oral rapamycin administration, persistent blanching was observed at 13 months after treatment. Adapted with permission from REF. 45.

Based on the preclinical results, we initiated a Phase I clinical study to determine the safety and efficacy of photochemotherapy [45]. With combined PDL and rapamycin therapy, we observed a persistent blanching response as long as 13 months after therapy (Fig. 5b). In contrast, considerable revascularization of the PDL-only sites was observed. Furthermore, in a clinical study involving 23 subjects with Sturge-Weber syndrome and PWS, Marqués et al. [120] reported that the combination of PDL and topical rapamycin led to a higher degree of blanching than PDL alone.

In summary, the integration of LSI as a longitudinal monitoring tool facilitated rapid discovery of new phototherapy protocols that now are in Phase I clinical trials.

V. REAL-TIME, CLINICAL LASER SPECKLE IMAGING DURING PULSED-DYE LASER THERAPY

Since the goal of laser therapy is acute photocoagulation of the blood vessels, we hypothesize that treatment outcome correlates with intraoperative measures of blood-flow reduction. With LSI measurements collected before and after laser therapy, we identified that regions of persistent perfusion oftentimes existed after treatment [121, 122]. We postulated that immediate re-treatment of these regions would lead to an improved treatment response, which then would result in a decrease in the number of required treatment sessions to achieve complete PWS blanching.

We then integrated LSI into the clinical workflow within the operating room. To achieve this goal, it was imperative to enable real-time processing and visualization of the raw speckle images. With the fast ‘roll’ algorithm described by Tom et al. [123], we achieved real-time blood-flow imaging at 10 frames per sec with use of the processing power of a NVIDIA graphics processing unit (GPU) [124]. We also changed the hardware to a tripod-based setup, as a first step towards flexible positioning during laser surgery [13, 125].

We utilized the real-time LSI system to measure PWS perfusion in the operating room during PDL treatment (Fig. 6, Video 1) [125]. In a study of 24 subjects, we determined that treatment outcome correlated with the magnitude of blood-flow reduction measured during laser therapy.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Images captured from a live video display of speckle flow index (SFI) during pulsed dye laser surgery of a patient with a port-wine stain birthmark on the face. (A) Before treatment, (B,C) two time points during treatment, (D) immediately after the first pass is complete. Note the considerable reduction in SFI achieved with the laser. Multimedia file Video 1 shows the unaltered SFI video during the first laser pass.

Other research groups have reported complementary findings. Qiu et al. [126] used LSI to measure perfusion dynamics during PDT on seven subjects with PWS. They found that PWS perfusion increased for several minutes during the course of treatment, followed by a sustained decreased in perfusion during the remaining treatment time. Perfusion levels at the end of treatment did not uniformly drop below initial values, leading the authors to suggest that additional treatment time may be required to achieve maximal birthmark blanching. Ren et al. [127] used LSI to quantify PWS perfusion in 40 subjects before PDT and at a three-to-six month follow-up. They found that the reduction in PWS perfusion during PDT was correlated to lesion blanching.

Collectively, these clinical studies indicate that intraoperative LSI can be used to monitor treatment progress and ultimately be used as real-time feedback to guide the clinician regarding the potential need for immediate additional treatment to regions exhibiting persistent perfusion. Larger-scale studies coupled with additional mechanistic insight will be necessary to assess the potential of LSI to provide a real-time measure of phototherapy dosimetry in the clinic.

VI. SUMMARY OF RESULTS

With the combination of 1) a suitable microvascular model (Fig. 3a), 2) LSI to evaluate blood-flow dynamics (Fig. 3b), and 3) a longitudinal experimental design (Fig. 4a), rapid preclinical assessment of new phototherapies can be achieved. The combination of PDT and PDL irradiation achieves a synergistic effect that reduces the required radiant exposures of the individual phototherapies to achieve persistent vascular shutdown (Fig. 4b), which may lead to a reduction in the complications associated with PDT and PDL therapy. The combination of PDL therapy or PDT with anti-angiogenic agents is a promising strategy to achieve persistent vascular shutdown (Fig. 5). Integration of LSI into the clinical workflow may lead to surgical image guidance that maximizes acute photocoagulation, which is expected to improve PWS therapeutic outcome (Fig. 6).

VII. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

Open issues remain related to our basic understanding of the etiology of PWS, the activated signaling pathways following phototherapy, and integration of optical imaging technologies into the operating room to inform clinicians during phototherapy of PWS.

Chemical modulation of PWS

With immunohistochemical analysis of biopsies from PWS, we concluded that different protein kinases may be activated during different stages of PWS development [6]. Our data suggest that use of protein kinase inhibitors may serve as a potential therapeutic protocol for PWS.

Preclinical assessment of blood flow during photochemotherapy

Continued assessment of the dosing, scheduling, and safety of anti-angiogenic agents in combination with phototherapy, is an area of intense activity. In addition to rapamycin, we recently reported on use of topical axitinib, which can modulate multiple signaling pathways associated with angiogenesis, in conjunction with PDL irradiation [128]. Further preclinical assessment of photochemotherapy is expected to yield candidate drug/light combinations for evaluation in clinical trials. LSI will continue to play a critical role in evaluation and translation of photochemotherapy to the clinic.

Intraoperative assessment of blood flow during PDL therapy

Based on our recent intraoperative LSI data (Fig. 6, Video 1) [125], we propose that development of a comprehensive image-guided treatment approach for individualized therapy. This approach is expected to increase the efficacy of each session (regardless of treatment methodology), enhancing PWS removal while reducing the frequency and duration of the treatment course and associated medical care burden. Future work should build upon our initial clinical study, to 1) determine the correlation between acute measurements of blood-flow changes and treatment response, 2) determine why some patients who experience major acute reductions in blood flow have poor treatment responses, and 3) determine how patient demographics (age, PWS anatomic location, gender, etc.) affect the acute reduction in blood flow and treatment response.

Clinical assessment of blood flow during photochemotherapy

Future work should investigate how blood flow changes during photochemotherapy. The observed reduction in blood flow immediately after PDL therapy (Fig. 6, Video 1) [125] may induce local hypoxia and stimulate activation of pro-angiogenic factors. Continued monitoring of blood flow may enable a personalized approach to the administration of antiangiogenic agents.

Integration of complementary optical imaging technologies into the preclinical and clinical workflow

Future work also should focus on evaluation of refinements to LSI and alternate optical imaging technologies, especially as devices become more user friendly in the clinic.

Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

We have demonstrated the potential of Doppler OCT to image changes in the microcirculation associated with PDL irradiation (Fig. 7a) [43, 129131]. Doppler OCT enables detailed, depth-resolved visualization of the perfused microcirculation, with the potential for real-time assessment. With the development of new light sources and continued refinement of algorithms, the speed and the resolution of Doppler OCT has improved, enabling more accurate in vivo characterization of PWS skin. For example, improved stability of components can further enhance the signal-to-noise ratio in Doppler flow images. In addition, a faster swept source is expected to increase the imaging speed, and hence extend the imaging area. Finally, integration of GPU-based processing is expected to enable faster calculation of blood flow and real-time 3-D display of the microvasculature in real time.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

(a) Maximum intensity projection of Doppler optical coherence tomogram taken from a port-wine stain located on the upper extremity. Adapted with permission from REF. 131. (b) (Left) Raw speckle and (Right) speckle contrast image of a dorsal window chamber. We collected the raw speckle image with a converted monochrome Canon 7D dSLR camera (LDP LLC, Carlstadt, NJ).

Photoacoustics

First described in biophotonics by Oraevsky et al. [132], photoacoustics is a promising approach for noninvasive imaging and characterization of biological tissues. Wang and Gao [133] published a comprehensive review of the technology. Few publications exist on use of photoacoustics to characterize PWS. Viator et al. [134] first applied photoacoustics for depth profiling of PWS, and showed reasonable agreement with the depth of vasculature derived from Doppler OCT images. Kolkman et al. [135] published images from three PWS and, although a plexus of vasculature was visible on each subject,, individual vessels were difficult to identify. Seminal developments in photoacoustic technology have enabled impressive imaging of the microcirculation in multiple tissue types, including brain [136], breast [137], and skin (Oh et al, 2006). Furthermore, with development of clinic-friendly photoacoustic devices [138] and improvements in imaging speed [138], we believe that photoacoustic technologies should be evaluated for assessment of PWS and that it has potential for surgical image guidance.

Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI)

With calibration data and model-based fitting of the image set collected at multiple spatial frequencies, SFDI has the unique capability of enabling quantification of spatially resolved optical absorption and scattering parameters, allowing wide-field quantitative mapping of tissue optical properties [139142]. By decoupling the multi-spectral absorption and scattering optical properties, SFDI removes the crosstalk in reflectivity changes resulting from physically distinct contrast mechanisms. With spectral unmixing of the absorption maps, it is possible to achieve quantitative assessment of the oxyhemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin and total hemoglobin contents, and hemoglobin oxygen saturation. Early preliminary data suggest the potential of SFDI to study PWS hemodynamics associated with phototherapy [141]. Further development of clinic-friendly SFDI devices [143] are expected to facilitate integration of the technology into the clinical workflow.

Refinements to Laser Speckle Imaging

We previously reported on the use of a color dSLR camera to perform LSI [144]. Such cameras already are integrated into the general clinical workflow, but the presence of the Bayer filter used to enable color photography, leads to a marked reduction in speckle contrast and hence measurement dynamic range. With use of a monochrome dSLR camera, the advantages of the form factor are maintained, but with the added benefit of full pixel sampling of the speckle pattern due to the absence of the Bayer filter (Fig. 7b). Also, speckle contrast values are affected not only by changes in blood flow but also by the local optical properties [145]. Novel approaches that account for optical property dynamics, such as coherent SFDI [146] or multiple-exposure LSI [147], can improve on the accuracy of LSI measurements, but currently at the penalty of increased acquisition and processing times. Continued refinement of these methods is expected to improve the quantitative accuracy of LSI for monitoring of phototherapy of PWS, especially in longitudinal studies.

VIII. CONCLUSIONS

We have reviewed our current knowledge on the etiology and treatment of PWS. Preclinical and clinical experimental studies demonstrate the critical role that optical imaging can play in development of new treatment strategies. Acute photocoagulation and persistent vascular shutdown may be key factors that lead to improved PWS therapeutic outcome, and the associated hemodynamics and biological response warrant further study. Continued integration of noninvasive optical imaging technologies and biochemical analysis collectively are expected to lead to more robust treatment strategies.

Acknowledgments

This was supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-10-1-0538), American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health (AR051443, AR063766, AR047551, AR059244, DE022831, EB015890, EY021529, HD065536, HL105215, TR000148).

We thank Mr. Henry Poulos for his contribution to Fig. 7b.

Biographies

graphic file with name nihms758587b1.gif

Bernard Choi was born in Chicago, IL, in 1974. He received the B.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering from Northwestern University in 1996, and the M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Biomedical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin in 2001. Since 2005, he has been an Assistant Professor (2005–2011) and currently is an Associate Professor with the Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Surgery, University of California, Irvine. He has faculty appointments in Beckman Laser Institute and Edwards Lifesciences Center for Advanced Cardiovascular, and is a visiting scientist at CHOC Children’s Hospital, Orange, CA. He is the author of two book chapters and more than 100 peer-reviewed articles. His research interests include in-vivo optical microvascular imaging, image-guided surgery, clinical translational research, and optical clearing of biological tissues.

graphic file with name nihms758587b2.gif

Wenbin Tan received the B.S. degree in medicine from Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, China, and the Ph.D. degree in Neurophysiology and Neurobiology from the University of California, Los Angeles. He is currently a scientist at Beckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine. He is interested in pathogenesis of port-wine stains.

graphic file with name nihms758587b3.gif

Wangcun Jia received the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in 2001. He was a post-doctoral fellow in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, Los Angeles from 2001 to 2003. He worked as a project scientist and later became a professional researcher in the Beckman Laser Institute at the University of California, Irvine. His research focuses on optical diagnostic techniques and novel treatment approaches for cutaneous vascular malformations. He is interested in the development of photothermal and photochemotherapies of vascular birthmarks.

graphic file with name nihms758587b4.gif

Sean M. White received a B.S. in optics from the University of Rochester in 2008, and a M.S. and Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from the University of California, Irvine in 2009 and 2013 where he was a National Science Foundation graduate research fellow. He is currently a postdoctoral scholar at the Beckman Laser Institute and a co-founder of several medical device companies where his work focuses on biophotonics.

graphic file with name nihms758587b5.gif

Wesley J. Moy is a Biomedical Engineering Postdoctoral Fellow working with Dr. Brian Wong, in the Head and Neck Surgery Laboratory at the Beckman Laser Institute. His PhD research at University of California, Irvine, focused on the alternative treatment for port wine stain disease, including the investigation of photodynamic therapy, pulsed dye laser treatments, intense pulsed light, and other light based technologies.

graphic file with name nihms758587b6.gif

Bruce Y. Yang received a B.S. in bioengineering from the University of California, San Diego in 1996, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from the University of California, Irvine in 2009 and 2013 where he was a National Institutes of Health TL-1 predoctoral fellow. He currently is a specialist at Beckman Laser Institute and a co-founder of a medical device company.

graphic file with name nihms758587b7.gif

Jiang Zhu Jiang Zhu received the Ph.D. degree in biology from Tsinghua University in 2009. He is now a postdoctoral researcher in Beckman Laser Institute. His interests include optical coherence elastography and Doppler OCT.

graphic file with name nihms758587b8.gif

Zhongping Chen received the B.S. degree in applied physics from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, in 1982, the M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Cornell University, NY, USA, in 1987, and the Ph.D. degree in applied physics from Cornell University in 1993. He is currently a Professor of biomedical engineering and the Director of the F-OCT Laboratory at the University of California, Irvine, CA. He is a cofounder and the Board Chairman of OCT Medical Imaging, Inc. His research interests encompass the areas of biomedical photonics, microfabrication, biomaterials, and biosensors. His research group has pioneered the development of functional optical coherence tomography, which simultaneously provides high-resolution 3-D images of tissue structure, blood flow, and birefringence. He has published more than 200 peer-reviewed papers and review articles and holds a number of patents in the fields of biomaterials, biosensors, and biomedical imaging. Dr. Chen is a Fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE), a Fellow of SPIE, and a Fellow of the Optical Society of America.

graphic file with name nihms758587b9.gif

Kristen M. Kelly is a board certified dermatologist and Professor at the University of California (UC), Irvine. She attended UC, Los Angeles as an undergraduate and medical student. She completed an internship in internal medicine and then a dermatology residency at UC Irvine. After residency, Dr. Kelly completed a fellowship in photomedicine and biomedical optics at the Beckman Laser Institute and then obtained an academic appointment in the departments of dermatology and surgery at UC Irvine. Her research has focused on optimization of cutaneous vascular lesion treatment, evaluation of cutaneous angiogenesis, and development of dermatologic light based imaging and therapeutic options. She lectures locally, nationally and internationally and has authored numerous scientific papers and book chapters on dermatologic laser topics. Dr. Kelly is a fellow of the American Academy of Dermatology and president elect of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery (ASLMS) and her research has been funded by the Sturge Weber Foundation, Dermatology Foundation and National Institutes of Health.

graphic file with name nihms758587b10.gif

J. Stuart Nelson is Medical Director of the Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Professor of Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, at the University of California Irvine and Director of the Vascular Birthmarks and Malformations Diagnostic and Treatment Center at the University of California Irvine Medical Center. Dr. Nelson specializes in the clinical management of infants, young children and adults with port-wine stains and other vascular malformations. Dr. Nelson’s university-based clinical practice and research combines his expertise in engineering, optics, medicine and surgery. Dr. Nelson and colleagues developed the “Dynamic Cooling Device” which has now been incorporated into more than 20,000 laser devices worldwide. Dr. Nelson has published more than 330 scientific articles and 15 book chapters. Dr. Nelson served as President of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery (ASLMS) 2001–2002. He served as Editor-in-Chief of the ASLMS journal Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 2005–2015.

Contributor Information

Bernard Choi, Email: choib@uci.edu, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Surgery, the Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, and the Edwards Lifesciences Center for Advanced Cardiovascular Technology, all at University of California, Irvine 92612 USA.

Wenbin Tan, Email: wenbint@uci.edu, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine 92612 USA.

Wangcun Jia, Email: wjia@uci.edu, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine 92612 USA.

Sean M. White, Email: seanmw@uci.edu, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine 92612 USA

Wesley J. Moy, Email: wmoy@uci.edu, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine 92612 USA

Bruce Y. Yang, Email: yangby@uci.edu, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine 92612 USA

Kristen M. Kelly, Email: kmkelly@uci.edu, Department of Dermatology and the Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, all at University of California, Irvine 92612 USA

J. Stuart Nelson, Email: jsnelson@uci.edu, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Surgery and the Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, all at University of California, Irvine 92612 USA.

References

  • 1.Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1982 Mar;69:412–22. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198203000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983 Apr 29;220:524–7. doi: 10.1126/science.6836297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tallman B, Tan OT, Morelli JG, Piepenbrink J, Stafford TJ, Trainor S, Weston WL. Location of port-wine stains and the likelihood of ophthalmic and/or central nervous system complications. Pediatrics. 1991 Mar;87:323–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Selim MM, Kelly KM, Nelson JS, Wendelschafer-Crabb G, Kennedy WR, Zelickson BD. Confocal microscopy study of nerves and blood vessels in untreated and treated port wine stains: Preliminary observations. Dermatologic Surgery. 2004 Jun;30:892–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30259.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shirley MD, Tang H, Gallione CJ, Baugher JD, Frelin LP, Cohen B, North PE, Marchuk DA, Comi AM, Pevsner J. Sturge-Weber syndrome and port-wine stains caused by somatic mutation in GNAQ. The New England journal of medicine. 2013 May 23;368:1971–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1213507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tan W, Chernova M, Gao L, Sun V, Liu H, Jia W, Langer S, Wang G, Mihm MC, Jr, Nelson JS. Sustained activation of c-Jun N-terminal and extracellular signal-regulated kinases in port-wine stain blood vessels. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2014 Nov;71:964–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vural E, Ramakrishnan J, Cetin N, Buckmiller L, Suen JY, Fan CY. The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in port-wine stains. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2008 Oct;139:560–4. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barsky SH, Rosen S, Geer DE, Noe JM. The nature and evolution of port wine stains: a computer-assisted study. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1980 Mar;74:154–7. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12535052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smithies DJ, van Gemert MJ, Hansen MK, Milner TE, Nelson JS. Three-dimensional reconstruction of port wine stain vascular anatomy from serial histological sections. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 1997 Sep;42:1843–7. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/9/014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Geronemus RG, Ashinoff R. The medical necessity of evaluation and treatment of port-wine stains. Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. 1991 Jan;17:76–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1991.tb01597.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Minkis K, Geronemus RG, Hale EK. Port wine stain progression: A potential consequence of delayed and inadequate treatment? Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2009;41:423–426. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heger M, Beek JF, Moldovan NI, van der Horst CM, van Gemert MJ. Towards optimization of selective photothermolysis: prothrombotic pharmaceutical agents as potential adjuvants in laser treatment of port wine stains. A theoretical study. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2005 Feb;93:242–56. doi: 10.1160/TH04-05-0291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aguilar G, Choi B, Broekgaarden M, Yang O, Yang B, Ghasri P, Chen JK, Bezemer R, Nelson JS, van Drooge AM, Wolkerstorfer A, Kelly KM, Heger M. An overview of three promising mechanical, optical, and biochemical engineering approaches to improve selective photothermolysis of refractory port wine stains. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2012 Feb;40:486–506. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0436-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hulsbergen Henning JP, van Gemert MJ, Lahaye CT. Clinical and histological evaluation of portwine stain treatment with a microsecond-pulsed dye-laser at 577 NM. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 1984;4:375–80. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900040410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tan OT, Sherwood K, Gilchrest BA. Treatment of children with port-wine stains using the flashlamp-pulsed tunable dye laser. New England Journal of Medicine. 1989 Feb 16;320:416–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198902163200702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tan OT, Morrison P, Kurban AK. 585-Nm for the Treatment of Port-Wine Stains. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1990 Dec;86:1112–1117. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199012000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chang CJ, Kelly KM, Van Gemert MJ, Nelson JS. Comparing the effectiveness of 585-nm vs 595-nm wavelength pulsed dye laser treatment of port wine stains in conjunction with cryogen spray cooling. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2002;31:352–8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kimel S, Svaasand LO, Cao D, Hammer-Wilson MJ, Nelson JS. Vascular response to laser photothermolysis as a function of pulse duration, vessel type, and diameter: implications for port wine stain laser therapy. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2002;30:160–169. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nelson JS, Milner TE, Anvari B, Tanenbaum BS, Kimel S, Svaasand LO, Jacques SL. Dynamic epidermal cooling during pulsed laser treatment of port-wine stain. A new methodology with preliminary clinical evaluation. Archives of Dermatology. 1995 Jun;131:695–700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Izikson L, Nelson JS, Anderson RR. Treatment of hypertrophic and resistant port wine stains with a 755 nm laser: a case series of 20 patients. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2009 Aug;41:427–32. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chapas AM, Eickhorst K, Geronemus RG. Efficacy of early treatment of facial port wine stains in newborns: a review of 49 cases. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2007 Aug;39:563–8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu X, Fan Y, Huang J, Zeng R, Cao G, Chen M, Chen W, Tang J. Can we predict the outcome of 595-nm wavelength pulsed dye laser therapy on capillary vascular malformations from the first beginning: a pilot study of efficacy co-related factors in 686 Chinese patients. Lasers in Medical Science. 2015;30:1041–1046. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1695-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lanigan SW. Port-wine stains unresponsive to pulsed dye laser: explanations and solutions. British Journal of Dermatology. 1998 Aug;139:173–177. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.van der Horst CM, Koster PH, de Borgie CA, Bossuyt PM, van Gemert MJ. Effect of the timing of treatment of portwine stains with the flash-lamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998 Apr 9;338:1028–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804093381504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Koster PH, van der Horst CM, Bossuyt PM, van Gemert MJ. Prediction of portwine stain clearance and required number of flashlamp pumped pulsed dye laser treatments. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2001;29:151–5. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Adatto MA, Luc-Levy J, Mordon S. Efficacy of a novel intense pulsed light system for the treatment of port wine stains. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy. 2010 Apr;12:54–60. doi: 10.3109/14764171003706158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kelly KM, Choi B, McFarlane S, Motosue A, Jung B, Khan MH, Ramirez-San-Juan JC, Nelson JS. Description and analysis of treatments for port-wine stain birthmarks. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery. 2005 Sep-Oct;7:287–94. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.7.5.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kelly KM, Nanda VS, Nelson JS. Treatment of portwine stain birthmarks using the 1.5-msec pulsed dye laser at high fluences in conjunction with cryogen spray cooling. Dermatologic Surgery. 2002 Apr;28:309–313. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02071.x-i1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Whang KK, Byun JY, Kim SH. A dual-wavelength approach with 585-nm pulsed-dye laser and 800-nm diode laser for treatment-resistant port-wine stains. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 2009 Oct;34:e436–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03454.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huikeshoven M, Koster PH, de Borgie CA, Beek JF, van Gemert MJ, van der Horst CM. Redarkening of port-wine stains 10 years after pulsed-dye-laser treatment. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2007 Mar 22;356:1235–40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Svaasand LO, Aguilar G, Viator JA, Randeberg LL, Kimel S, Nelson JS. Increase of dermal blood volume fraction reduces the threshold for laser-induced purpura: Implications for port wine stain laser treatment. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2004;34:182–188. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Choi B, Jia W, Channual J, Kelly KM, Lotfi J. The importance of long-term monitoring to evaluate the microvascular response to light-based therapies. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2008 Feb;128:485–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Verkruysse W, Pickering JW, Beek JF, Keijzer M, van Gemert MJ. Modeling the effect of wavelength on the pulsed dye laser treatment of port wine stains. Applied Optics. 1993 Feb 1;32:393–8. doi: 10.1364/AO.32.000393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Verkruysse W, Lucassen GW, de Boer JF, Smithies DJ, Nelson JS, van Gemert MJC. Modelling light distributions of homogeneous versus discrete absorbers in light irradiated turbid media. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 1997 Jan;42:51–65. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/1/003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pfefer TJ, Barton JK, Chan EK, Ducros MG, Sorg BS, Milner TE, Nelson JS, Welch AJ. A three-dimensional modular adaptable grid numerical model for light propagation during laser irradiation of skin tissue. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 1996 Dec;2:934–942. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pfefer TJ, Barton JK, Smithies DJ, Milner TE, Nelson JS, van Gemert MJ, Welch AJ. Modeling laser treatment of port wine stains with a computer-reconstructed biopsy. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 1999;24:151–66. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1999)24:2<151::aid-lsm11>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shafirstein G, Baumler W, Lapidoth M, Ferguson S, North PE, Waner M. A new mathematical approach to the diffusion approximation theory for selective photothermolysis modeling and its implication in laser treatment of port-wine stains. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2004;34:335–347. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.van Gemert MJ, Nelson JS, Milner TE, Smithies DJ, Verkruysse W, de Boer JF, Lucassen GW, Goodman DM, Tanenbaum BS, Norvang LT, Svaasand LO. Non-invasive determination of port wine stain anatomy and physiology for optimal laser treatment strategies. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 1997 May;42:937–50. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/5/013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Milner TE, Goodman DM, Tanenbaum BS, Nelson JS. Depth profiling of laser-heated chromophores in biological tissues by pulsed photothermal radiometry. Journal of the Optical Society of America A Optics image science, and vision. 1995 Jul;12:1479–88. doi: 10.1364/josaa.12.001479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Majaron B, Verkruysse W, Tanenbaum BS, Milner TE, Telenkov SA, Goodman DM, Nelson JS. Combining two excitation wavelengths for pulsed photothermal profiling of hypervascular lesions in human skin. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2000 Jul;45:1913–1922. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/7/315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Choi B, Majaron B, Nelson JS. Computational model to evaluate port wine stain depth profiling using pulsed photothermal radiometry. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2004 Mar-Apr;9:299–307. doi: 10.1117/1.1646173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Majaron B, Verkruysse W, Tanenbaum BS, Milner TE, Nelson JS. Spectral variation of the infrared absorption coefficient in pulsed photothermal profiling of biological samples. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2002 Jun 7;47:1929–1946. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/11/307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nelson JS, Kelly KM, Zhao Y, Chen Z. Imaging blood flow in human port-wine stain in situ and in real time using optical Doppler tomography. Archives of Dermatology. 2001 Jun;137:741–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chen JK, Ghasri P, Aguilar G, van Drooge AM, Wolkerstorfer A, Kelly KM, Heger M. An overview of clinical and experimental treatment modalities for port wine stains. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2012 Aug;67:289–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.11.938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nelson JS, Jia W, Phung TL, Mihm MC., Jr Observations on enhanced port wine stain blanching induced by combined pulsed dye laser and rapamycin administration. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2011 Dec;43:939–42. doi: 10.1002/lsm.21141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Phung TL, Oble DA, Jia W, Benjamin LE, Mihm MC, Jr, Nelson JS. Can the wound healing response of human skin be modulated after laser treatment and the effects of exposure extended? Implications on the combined use of the pulsed dye laser and a topical angiogenesis inhibitor for treatment of port wine stain birthmarks. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2008 Jan;40:1–5. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li G, Sun J, Shao X, Sang H, Zhou Z. The effects of 595-and 1,064-nm lasers on rooster comb blood vessels using dual-wavelength and multipulse techniques. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] 2011 Oct;37:1473–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yuan K, Yuan Y, Gu Y, Gao J, Xing D. In vivo photoacoustic imaging of model of port wine stains. Journal of Xray Science and Technology. 2012;20:249–54. doi: 10.3233/XST-2012-0333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Huang N, Cheng G, Wang Y, Zeng J, Qiu H, Gu Y. Influence of laser wavelength on the damage of comb’s vasculature by photodynamic therapy--simulation and validation of mathematical models. Lasers in Medical Science. 2011 Sep;26:665–72. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0890-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kelly KM, Kimel S, Smith T, Stacy A, Hammer-Wilson M, Svaasand LO, Nelson JS. Combined photodynamic and photothermal damage to chick chorioallantoic membrane blood vessels: Implications for port wine stain treatment. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2004:19–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kimel S, Svaasand LO, Hammer-Wilson MJ, Nelson JS. Influence of wavelength on response to laser photothermolysis of blood vessels: Implications for port wine stain laser therapy. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2003;33:288–295. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kimel S, Svaasand LO, Hammerwilson M, Schell MJ, Milner TE, Nelson JS, Berns MW. Differential Vascular-Response to Laser Photothermolysis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1994 Nov;103:693–700. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12398548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Moy AJ, White SM, Indrawan ES, Lotfi J, Nudelman MJ, Costantini SJ, Agarwal N, Jia W, Kelly KM, Sorg BS, Choi B. Wide-field functional imaging of blood flow and hemoglobin oxygen saturation in the rodent dorsal window chamber. Microvascular Research. 2011 Nov;82:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Palmer GM, Fontanella AN, Shan S, Hanna G, Zhang G, Fraser CL, Dewhirst MW. In vivo optical molecular imaging and analysis in mice using dorsal window chamber models applied to hypoxia, vasculature and fluorescent reporters. Nature Protocols. 2011;6:1355–1366. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jain RK, Munn LL, Fukumura D. Dissecting tumour pathophysiology using intravital microscopy. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2002 Apr;2:266–76. doi: 10.1038/nrc778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sorg BS, Moeller BJ, Donovan O, Cao Y, Dewhirst MW. Hyperspectral imaging of hemoglobin saturation in tumor microvasculature and tumor hypoxia development. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2005 Jul-Aug;10:44004. doi: 10.1117/1.2003369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tsai AG, Johnson PC, Intaglietta M. Oxygen gradients in the microcirculation. Physiological Reviews. 2003 Jul;83:933–63. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.White SM, Pittman CR, Hingorani R, Arora R, Esipova TV, Vinogradov SA, Hughes CC, Choi B, George SC. Implanted cell-dense prevascularized tissues develop functional vasculature that supports reoxygenation after thrombosis. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2014 Sep;20:2316–28. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Boas DA, Dunn AK. Laser speckle contrast imaging in biomedical optics. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2010 Jan-Feb;15:011109. doi: 10.1117/1.3285504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dunn AK. Laser speckle contrast imaging of cerebral blood flow. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2012 Feb;40:367–77. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0469-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Senarathna J, Rege A, Li N, Thakor NV. Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging: theory, instrumentation and applications. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 2013;6:99–110. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2013.2243140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Briers D, Duncan DD, Hirst E, Kirkpatrick SJ, Larsson M, Steenbergen W, Stromberg T, Thompson OB. Laser speckle contrast imaging: theoretical and practical limitations. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2013 Jun;18:066018. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.066018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fercher AF, Briers JD. Flow Visualization by Means of Single-Exposure Speckle Photography. Optics Communications. 1981;37:326–330. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bandyopadhyay R, Gittings AS, Suh SS, Dixon PK, Durian DJ. Speckle-visibility spectroscopy: A tool to study time-varying dynamics. Review of Scientific Instruments. 2005;76:093110. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Thompson O, Andrews M, Hirst E. Correction for spatial averaging in laser speckle contrast analysis. Biomedical Optics Express. 2011;2:1021–9. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.001021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ramirez-San-Juan JC, Ramos-Garcia R, Guizar-Iturbide I, Martinez-Niconoff G, Choi B. Impact of velocity distribution assumption on simplified laser speckle imaging equation. Optics Express. 2008 Mar 3;16:3197–203. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.003197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cheng H, Duong TQ. Simplified laser-speckle-imaging analysis method and its application to retinal blood flow imaging. Optics Letters. 2007 Aug 1;32:2188–90. doi: 10.1364/ol.32.002188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Choi B, Ramirez-San-Juan JC, Lotfi J, Stuart Nelson J. Linear response range characterization and in vivo application of laser speckle imaging of blood flow dynamics. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2006 Jul-Aug;11:041129. doi: 10.1117/1.2341196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ashinoff R, Geronemus RG. Flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser for port-wine stains in infancy: earlier versus later treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1991 Mar;24:467–72. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70075-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fiskerstrand EJ, Svaasand LO, Kopstad G, Dalaker M, Norvang LT, Volden G. Laser treatment of port wine stains: therapeutic outcome in relation to morphological parameters. British Journal of Dermatology. 1996 Jun;134:1039–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hohenleutner U, Hilbert M, Wlotzke U, Landthaler M. Epidermal damage and limited coagulation depth with the flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser: a histochemical study. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1995 May;104:798–802. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12606996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tan OT, Carney JM, Margolis R, Seki Y, Boll J, Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Histologic responses of port-wine stains treated by argon, carbon dioxide, and tunable dye lasers. A preliminary report. Archives of Dermatology. 1986 Sep;122:1016–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Celli JP, Spring BQ, Rizvi I, Evans CL, Samkoe KS, Verma S, Pogue BW, Hasan T. Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization. Chemical Reviews. 2010 May 12;110:2795–838. doi: 10.1021/cr900300p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bernstein EF, Thomas GF, Smith PD, Mitchell JB, Glatstein E, Kantor GR, Spielvogel RL, Maiese SC, Russo A. Response of black and white guinea pig skin to photodynamic treatment using 514-nm light and dihematoporphyrin ether. Archives of Dermatology. 1990 Oct;126:1303–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gu Y, Huang NY, Liang J, Pan YM, Liu FG. Clinical study of 1949 cases of port wine stains treated with vascular photodynamic therapy (Gu’s PDT) Annales de Dermatologie et de Venereologie. 2007 Mar;134:241–4. doi: 10.1016/s0151-9638(07)91816-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Huang Z. Photodynamic therapy in China: Over 25 years of unique clinical experience Part two-Clinical experience. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2006 Jun;3:71–84. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2006.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Xiao Q, Li Q, Yuan KH, Cheng B. Photodynamic therapy of port-wine stains: long-term efficacy and complication in Chinese patients. The Journal of Dermatology. 2011 Dec;38:1146–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yu W, Ma G, Qiu Y, Chen H, Jin Y, Yang X, Hu X, Chang L, Wang T, Zhou H, Li W, Lin X. 18 years long-term results of facial port-wine stain (PWS) after photodynamic therapy (PDT)--a case report. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2015 Mar;12:143–5. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yuan KH, Li Q, Yu WL, Zeng D, Zhang C, Huang Z. Comparison of photodynamic therapy and pulsed dye laser in patients with port wine stain birthmarks: a retrospective analysis. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2008 Mar;5:50–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhang B, Zhang TH, Huang Z, Li Q, Yuan KH, Hu ZQ. Comparison of pulsed dye laser (PDL) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) for treatment of facial port-wine stain (PWS) birthmarks in pediatric patients. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2014 Dec;11:491–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhang FJ, Hu XM, Zhou Y, Li Q. Optimization of irradiance for photodynamic therapy of port-wine stain. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2015 Apr;20:048004. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.4.048004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhao Y, Zhou Z, Zhou G, Tu P, Zheng Q, Tao J, Gu Y, Zhu X. Efficacy and safety of hemoporfin in photodynamic therapy for port-wine stain: a multicenter and open-labeled phase IIa study. Photodermatology photoimmunology & photomedicine. 2011 Feb;27:17–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2010.00555.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gao K, Huang Z, Yuan KH, Zhang B, Hu ZQ. Side-by-side comparison of photodynamic therapy and pulsed-dye laser treatment of port-wine stain birthmarks. The British Journal of Dermatology. 2013 May;168:1040–6. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Qiu H, Gu Y, Wang Y, Huang N. Twenty years of clinical experience with a new modality of vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for port wine stains. Dermatologic Surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] 2011 Nov;37:1603–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Pu Y, Chen W, Yu Z. Research progress of Hemoporfin--part one: preclinical study. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2012 Jun;9:180–5. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2011.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Qin ZP, Li KL, Ren L, Xiu XJ. Photodynamic therapy of port wine stain: A report of 238 cases. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2007;4:53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Qin ZP, Li KL, Ren L, Liu XJ. Photodynamic therapy of port wine stains-a report of 238 cases. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2007 Mar;4:53–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Channual J, Choi B, Osann K, Pattanachinda D, Lotfi J, Kelly KM. Vascular effects of photodynamic and pulsed dye laser therapy protocols. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2008 Nov;40:644–50. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kelly KM, Kimel S, Smith T, Stacy A, Hammer-Wilson MJ, Svaasand LO, Nelson JS. Combined photodynamic and photothermal induced injury enhances damage to in vivo model blood vessels. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2004;34:407–413. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kimel S, Svaasand LO, Kelly KM, Nelson JS. Synergistic photodynamic and photothermal treatment of portwine stain? Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2004;34:80–82. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Smith TK, Choi B, Ramirez-San-Juan JC, Nelson JS, Osann K, Kelly KM. Microvascular blood flow dynamics associated with photodynamic therapy, pulsed dye laser irradiation and combined regimens. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2006 Jun;38:532–539. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Tournas JA, Lai J, Truitt A, Huang YC, Osann KE, Choi B, Kelly KM. Combined benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring photodynamic therapy and pulsed dye laser for port wine stain birthmarks. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2009 Sep-Dec;6:195–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Mitra S, Foster TH. In vivo confocal fluorescence imaging of the intratumor distribution of the photosensitizer mono-Laspartylchlorin-e6. Neoplasia. 2008 May;10:429–438. doi: 10.1593/neo.08104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Akimoto J, Haraoka J, Aizawa K. Preliminary clinical report on safety and efficacy of photodynamic therapy using talaporfin sodium for malignant gliomas. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2012 Jun;9:91–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kujundzic M, Vogl TJ, Stimac D, Rustemovic N, Hsi RA, Roh M, Katicic M, Cuenca R, Lustig RA, Wang S. A Phase II safety and effect on time to tumor progression study of intratumoral light infusion technology using talaporfin sodium in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2007 Nov 1;96:518–24. doi: 10.1002/jso.20832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lustig RA, Vogl TJ, Fromm D, Cuenca R, Alex Hsi R, D’Cruz AK, Krajina Z, Turic M, Singhal A, Chen JC. A multicenter Phase I safety study of intratumoral photoactivation of talaporfin sodium in patients with refractory solid tumors. Cancer. 2003 Oct 15;98:1767–71. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Yano T, Muto M, Yoshimura K, Niimi M, Ezoe Y, Yoda Y, Yamamoto Y, Nishisaki H, Higashino K, Iishi H. Phase I study of photodynamic therapy using talaporfin sodium and diode laser for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Radiation Oncology. 2012;7:113. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Nelson JS, Roberts WG, Berns MW. In vivo studies on the utilization of mono-L-aspartyl chlorin (NPe6) for photodynamic therapy. Cancer Research. 1987 Sep 1;47:4681–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Moy WJ, Patel SJ, Lertsakdadet BS, Arora RP, Nielsen KM, Kelly KM, Choi B. Preclinical in vivo evaluation of Npe6-mediated photodynamic therapy on normal vasculature. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2012 Feb;44:158–162. doi: 10.1002/lsm.21155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kelly KM, Moy WJ, Moy AJ, Lertsakdadet BS, Moy JJ, Nguyen E, Nguyen A, Osann KE, Choi B. Talaporfin sodium-mediated photodynamic therapy alone and in combination with pulsed dye laser on cutaneous vasculature. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2015 Jan;135:302–4. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Jia W, Sun V, Tran N, Choi B, Liu SW, Mihm MC, Jr, Phung TL, Nelson JS. Long-term blood vessel removal with combined laser and topical rapamycin antiangiogenic therapy: implications for effective port wine stain treatment. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2010 Feb;42:105–12. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Coulon C, Georgiadou M, Roncal C, De Bock K, Langenberg T, Carmeliet P. From vessel sprouting to normalization: role of the prolyl hydroxylase domain protein/hypoxia-inducible factor oxygen-sensing machinery. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. 2010 Dec;30:2331–6. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.214106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Fong GH. Regulation of angiogenesis by oxygen sensing mechanisms. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2009 Jun;87:549–60. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0458-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature. 2011 May 19;473:298–307. doi: 10.1038/nature10144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Chang CJ, Hsiao YC, Mihm MC, Jr, Nelson JS. Pilot study examining the combined use of pulsed dye laser and topical Imiquimod versus laser alone for treatment of port wine stain birthmarks. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2008 Nov;40:605–10. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Tremaine AM, Armstrong J, Huang YC, Elkeeb L, Ortiz A, Harris R, Choi B, Kelly KM. Enhanced port-wine stain lightening achieved with combined treatment of selective photothermolysis and imiquimod. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2012 Apr;66:634–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.11.958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ferrara N. VEGF-A: a critical regulator of blood vessel growth. European Cytokine Network. 2009 Dec;20:158–63. doi: 10.1684/ecn.2009.0170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Nagy JA, Dvorak AM, Dvorak HF. VEGF-A and the induction of pathological angiogenesis. Annual Review of Pathology. 2007;2:251–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.2.010506.134925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Karar J, Maity A. PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway in Angiogenesis. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 2011;4:51. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hay N, Sonenberg N. Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes & Development. 2004 Aug 15;18:1926–45. doi: 10.1101/gad.1212704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Pullen N, Thomas G. The modular phosphorylation and activation of p70s6k. FEBS Letters. 1997 Jun 23;410:78–82. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00323-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Saitoh M, Pullen N, Brennan P, Cantrell D, Dennis PB, Thomas G. Regulation of an activated S6 kinase 1 variant reveals a novel mammalian target of rapamycin phosphorylation site. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002 May 31;277:20104–12. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201745200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Saunders RN, Metcalfe MS, Nicholson ML. Rapamycin in transplantation: a review of the evidence. Kidney International. 2001 Jan;59:3–16. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00460.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, Colombo A, Schuler G, Barragan P, Guagliumi G, Molnar F, Falotico R. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2002 Jun 6;346:1773–80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Guba M, von Breitenbuch P, Steinbauer M, Koehl G, Flegel S, Hornung M, Bruns CJ, Zuelke C, Farkas S, Anthuber M, Jauch KW, Geissler EK. Rapamycin inhibits primary and metastatic tumor growth by antiangiogenesis: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor. Nature Medicine. 2002 Feb;8:128–35. doi: 10.1038/nm0202-128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kwon YS, Hong HS, Kim JC, Shin JS, Son Y. Inhibitory effect of rapamycin on corneal neovascularization in vitro and in vivo. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2005 Feb;46:454–60. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Phung TL, Ziv K, Dabydeen D, Eyiah-Mensah G, Riveros M, Perruzzi C, Sun J, Monahan-Earley RA, Shiojima I, Nagy JA, Lin MI, Walsh K, Dvorak AM, Briscoe DM, Neeman M, Sessa WC, Dvorak HF, Benjamin LE. Pathological angiogenesis is induced by sustained Akt signaling and inhibited by rapamycin. Cancer Cell. 2006 Aug;10:159–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Humar R, Kiefer FN, Berns H, Resink TJ, Battegay EJ. Hypoxia enhances vascular cell proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro via rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent signaling. FASEB Journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2002 Jun;16:771–80. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0658com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Dejneka NS, Kuroki AM, Fosnot J, Tang W, Tolentino MJ, Bennett J. Systemic rapamycin inhibits retinal and choroidal neovascularization in mice. Molecular Vision. 2004 Dec 22;10:964–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Marques L, Nunez-Cordoba JM, Aguado L, Pretel M, Boixeda P, Nagore E, Baselga E, Redondo P. Topical rapamycin combined with pulsed dye laser in the treatment of capillary vascular malformations in Sturge-Weber syndrome: phase II, randomized, double-blind, intraindividual placebo-controlled clinical trial. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2015 Jan;72:151–8 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Huang YC, Ringold TL, Nelson JS, Choi B. Noninvasive blood flow imaging for real-time feedback during laser therapy of port wine stain birthmarks. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2008 Mar;40:167–73. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Huang YC, Tran N, Shumaker PR, Kelly K, Ross EV, Nelson JS, Choi B. Blood flow dynamics after laser therapy of port wine stain birthmarks. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2009;41:563–571. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Tom WJ, Ponticorvo A, Dunn AK. Efficient Processing of Laser Speckle Contrast Images. Ieee Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2008 Dec;27:1728–1738. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.925081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Yang O, Cuccia D, Choi B. Real-time blood flow visualization using the graphics processing unit. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2011 Jan-Feb;16:016009. doi: 10.1117/1.3528610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Yang B, Yang O, Guzman J, Nguyen P, Crouzet C, Osann KE, Kelly KM, Nelson JS, Choi B. Intraoperative, real-time monitoring of blood flow dynamics associated with laser surgery of port wine stain birthmarks. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2015 Aug;47:469–75. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Qiu H, Zhou Y, Gu Y, Ang Q, Zhao S, Wang Y, Zeng J, Huang N. Monitoring microcirculation changes in port wine stains during vascular targeted photodynamic therapy by laser speckle imaging. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2012 Jul-Aug;88:978–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Ren J, Li P, Zhao H, Chen D, Zhen J, Wang Y, Gu Y. Assessment of tissue perfusion changes in port wine stains after vascular targeted photodynamic therapy: a short-term follow-up study. Lasers in Medical Science. 2014 Mar;29:781–8. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1420-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Gao K, Huang Z, Yuan KH, Zhang B, Hu ZQ. Side-byside comparison of photodynamic therapy and pulsed-dye laser treatment of port-wine stain birthmarks. British Journal of Dermatology. 2013 May;168:1040–6. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Ren H, Ding Z, Zhao Y, Miao J, Nelson JS, Chen Z. Phase-resolved functional optical coherence tomography: simultaneous imaging of in situ tissue structure, blood flow velocity, standard deviation, birefringence, and Stokes vectors in human skin. Optics Letters. 2002 Oct 1;27:1702–4. doi: 10.1364/ol.27.001702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zhao Y, Chen Z, Saxer C, Shen Q, Xiang S, de Boer JF, Nelson JS. Doppler standard deviation imaging for clinical monitoring of in vivo human skin blood flow. Optics Letters. 2000 Sep 15;25:1358–60. doi: 10.1364/ol.25.001358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Liu G, Jia W, Nelson JS, Chen Z. In vivo, high-resolution, three-dimensional imaging of port wine stain microvasculature in human skin. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2013 Dec;45:628–32. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Oraevsky AA, Jacques SL, Tittel FK. Measurement of tissue optical properties by time-resolved detection of laser-induced transient stress. Applied Optics. 1997 Jan 1;36:402–15. doi: 10.1364/ao.36.000402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Wang LV, Gao L. Photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography: from bench to bedside. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2014 Jul 11;16:155–85. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-104553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Viator JA, Au G, Paltauf G, Jacques SL, Prahl SA, Ren H, Chen Z, Nelson JS. Clinical testing of a photoacoustic probe for port wine stain depth determination. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2002;30:141–8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Kolkman RG, Mulder MJ, Glade CP, Steenbergen W, van Leeuwen TG. Photoacoustic imaging of port-wine stains. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2008 Mar;40:178–82. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Wang X, Pang Y, Ku G, Xie X, Stoica G, Wang LV. Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain. Nature Biotechnology. 2003 Jul;21:803–6. doi: 10.1038/nbt839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Kruger RA, Lam RB, Reinecke DR, Del Rio SP, Doyle RP. Photoacoustic angiography of the breast. Medical Physics. 2010 Nov;37:6096–100. doi: 10.1118/1.3497677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Zhou Y, Xing W, Maslov KI, Cornelius LA, Wang LV. Handheld photoacoustic microscopy to detect melanoma depth in vivo. Optics Letters. 2014 Aug 15;39:4731–4. doi: 10.1364/OL.39.004731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Cuccia DJ, Bevilacqua F, Durkin AJ, Ayers FR, Tromberg BJ. Quantitation and mapping of tissue optical properties using modulated imaging. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2009 Mar-Apr;14:024012. doi: 10.1117/1.3088140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Mazhar A, Dell S, Cuccia DJ, Gioux S, Durkin AJ, Frangioni JV, Tromberg BJ. Wavelength optimization for rapid chromophore mapping using spatial frequency domain imaging. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2010 Nov-Dec;15:061716. doi: 10.1117/1.3523373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Mazhar A, Sharif SA, Cuccia JD, Nelson JS, Kelly KM, Durkin AJ. Spatial frequency domain imaging of port wine stain biochemical composition in response to laser therapy: a pilot study. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2012 Oct;44:611–21. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Ponticorvo A, Taydas E, Mazhar A, Scholz T, Kim HS, Rimler J, Evans GR, Cuccia DJ, Durkin AJ. Quantitative assessment of partial vascular occlusions in a swine pedicle flap model using spatial frequency domain imaging. Biomedical Optics Express. 2013 Feb 1;4:298–306. doi: 10.1364/BOE.4.000298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Yang B, Lesicko J, Sharma M, Hill M, Sacks MS, Tunnell JW. Polarized light spatial frequency domain imaging for non-destructive quantification of soft tissue fibrous structures. Biomedical Optics Express. 2015 Apr 1;6:1520–33. doi: 10.1364/BOE.6.001520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Yang O, Choi B. Laser speckle imaging using a consumer-grade color camera. Optics Letters. 2012 Oct 1;37:3957–9. doi: 10.1364/OL.37.003957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Mazhar A, Cuccia DJ, Rice TB, Carp SA, Durkin AJ, Boas DA, Choi B, Tromberg BJ. Laser speckle imaging in the spatial frequency domain. Biomedical Optics Express. 2011 Jun 1;2:1553–63. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.001553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Rice TB, Konecky SD, Mazhar A, Cuccia DJ, Durkin AJ, Choi B, Tromberg BJ. Quantitative determination of dynamical properties using coherent spatial frequency domain imaging. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2011 Oct 1;28:2108–14. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.28.002108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Parthasarathy AB, Tom WJ, Gopal A, Zhang X, Dunn AK. Robust flow measurement with multi-exposure speckle imaging. Optics Express. 2008 Feb 4;16:1975–89. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.001975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES