Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 21;6:23421. doi: 10.1038/srep23421

Table 2. Comparison of the failure reason of pyrosequencing between BamHI treated group and non-BamHI treated group.

Failure reason Non open-loop group
Open-loop group
MT1 MT3 MT10 MT13 MT1 MT3 MT10 MT13
Blood
 Failed bisulfite conversion 100%(16/16) 10%(1/10) 81.82%(27/33) 89.19%(33/37) 0 50%(2/4) 0 6.67%(1/15)
 Lack of data 0 10%(1/10) 0 0 28%(7/25) 0 33.33%(1/3) 13.33%(2/15)
 Possible dispensation error/Failed reference sequence pattern 0 0 0 2.70%(1/37) 72%(18/25) 0 0 0
 Low signal-to-noise ratio 0 80%(8/10) 18.18%(6/33) 8.11%(3/37) 0 50%(2/4) 66.67%(2/3) 80%(12/15)
Saliva
 Failed bisulfite conversion 0 0 0 0 0 66.67%(2/3) 0 0
 Lack of data 50%(1/2) 0 0 0 100(3/3) 0 0 0
 Possible dispensation error/Failed reference sequence pattern 0 0 0 0 0 33.33%(1/3) 0 0
 Low signal-to-noise ratio 50%(1/2) 100%(2/2) 100%(2/2) 100%(1/1) 0 0 100%(1/1) 100%(2/2)