Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Aug;40(8):1646–1656.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.05.026

Table 2.

Univariate analysis on preference for finger replantation vs. revision amputation

Treatment preference Replantation Amputation P-value
Total 107 (82%) 23 (18%)
Patient demographics
Country 0.34
US 38 (78%) 11 (22%)
Japan 69 (85%) 12 (15%)
Gender 0.90
Male 45 (82%) 10 (18%)
Female 62 (83%) 13 (17%)
Importance of factors in decision
Function 0.54
Important 89 (83%) 18 (78%)
Moderate 16 (15%) 5 (22%)
Not important 2 (2%) 0 (0%)
Appearance
Important 60 (56%) 7 (30%) <0.01
Moderate 28 (26%) 4 (17%)
Not important 19 (18%) 12 (52%)
Sensation of the affected finger 0.55
Important 71 (66%) 16 (70%)
Moderate 29 (27%) 7 (30%)
Not important 7 (7%) 0 (0%)
Cost of the procedure 0.31
Important 31 (29%) 10 (43%)
Moderate 38 (36%) 8 (35%)
Not important 38 (36%) 5 (22%)
Insurance coverage 0.41
Important 61 (57%) 14 (61%)
Moderate 25 (21%) 7 (30%)
Not important 21 (21%) 2 (9%)
Chance of survival of the replant 0.01
Important 87 (81%) 15 (65%)
Moderate 19 (18%) 5 (22%)
Not important 1 (1%) 3 (13%)
Recovery time <0.001
Important 29 (27%) 16 (70%)
Moderate 46 (43%) 5 (22%)
Not important 32 (30%) 2 (9%)
Time away from work 0.17
Important 41 (38%) 12 (52%)
Moderate 38 (36%) 9 (39%)
Not important 28 (26%) 2 (9%)
Estimate of function after replant 0.26
Good 27 (25%) 2 (10%)
Moderate 26 (24%) 7 (33%)
Not good 56 (51%) 12 (57%)
Estimate of function after revision amputation 0.48
Good 26 (24%) 7 (33%)
Moderate 32 (29%) 7 (33%)
Not good 51 (47%) 7 (33%)
Attitudes on Body integrity
Agree (it should be preserved) 37 (35%) 4 (17%) 0.09
Neutral 38 (36%) 7 (30%)
Disagree (preservation is not important) 32 (30%) 12 (53%)
Estimate on Stigma towards finger amputees
Agree (there will be stigma) 38 (36%) 6 (26%) 0.83
Neutral 34 (32%) 9 (39%)
Disagree (there will not be stigma) 35 (33%) 8 (35%)

Bolded values indicate statistical significance