Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 11;5(2):e1082027. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1082027

Table 3.

High priority questions for increasing immunotherapeutic efficacy against tumors in the CNS.

Preclinical  
• Do inhibitors that co-target IDO1 and IDO2 provide superior efficacy when compared to monotherapy?
• Will inhibitors of tryptophan catabolism complement other immunotherapies?
• Which capacity of IDO1 is more important for immunotherapeutic efficacy: signal transduction modifier vs. tryptophan catabolism?
• What is the best approach for further identification of ubiquitous GBM-specific neoantigens for translation into vaccine and/or adoptive T cell therapeutic approaches?
• Is there an optimal vaccination approach to generate functional T cell responses and is this GBM subtype-specific (i.e. responsiveness in classical vs. mesenchymal, newly diagnosed vs. recurrent)?
• Do different GBM subtypes possess correlative mutational frequencies that associate with responsiveness to immunotherapy?
• Will survival outcomes be enhanced with combinatorial approaches (vaccine ± RT ± checkpoint blockade ± STING activation)?
 
Clinical
 
• Will GBM respond to immune checkpoint blockade?
• What is the best approach for identifying patient cohorts that will benefit from immunotherapy?
• What is the best approach for monitoring treatment effectiveness in GBM patients to immunotherapy (i.e. peripheral blood markers, tryptophan metabolic profiling or IHC markers in the tumor)?
• What is the best approach to limit brain swelling following immunotherapy? Is bevacizumab an alternative to decadron that can be easily added without defusing effectiveness?