Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 21.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 9;87:345–355. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.001

Table 1.

All studies entered into the meta analysis are listed, including number of subjects, gender ratio, stimulus material and contrast.

Authors Number of
subjects
Gender ratio
(f/m)
Stimulus material Contrasts Mean age
(SD)
Analysis
software
Campbell-Sills et al. (2011) 26 22/4 IAPS, negative Reduce > baseline 19.15 (1.83) AFNI
Delgado et al. (2008) 12 6/6 Fear conditioning paradigm
with instruction
Decrease > attend 23.29 (3.31) BrainVoyager
Domes et al. (2010) 33 17/16 IAPS, negative Decrease > maintain m: 25.2 (1.9) SPM5
Increase > maintain f: 24.6 (1.6)
Eippert et al. (2007) 24 24/0 IAPS, neutral and
negative (fear)
Decrease > view
Increase > view
23.3
(range 18–28)
SPM2
Goldin et al. (2008) 17 17/0 Disgust-inducing and
neutral film clips
Reappraise > watch negative (early, middle, late)
Suppress > watch negative (early, middle, late)
22.7 (3.5) AFNI
Harenski et Hamann (2006) 10 10/0 IAPS and popular media,
moral vs non-moral,
social unpleasant scenes
Decrease moral > odd-even baseline
Decrease non-moral > odd-even baseline
Decrease moral > watch moral
Decrease non-moral > watch non-moral
(Range 18–29) SPM99
Hayes et al. (2010) 25 11/14 IAPS and in-house pictures,
negative
Reappraise > view
Suppress > view
21.6 (2.5) FSL
Kanske et al. (2011) 30 17/13 IAPS, neg, pos, neutral, Reappraise > view emotional (=neg and pos)
Reappraise/distract > view
21.8 (2.1) SPM5
Kim and Hamann (2007) 10 10/0 IAPS, negative and positive Decrease positive > watch positive
Decrease negative > watch negative
Increase negative > watch negative
Increase positive > watch positive
20.7
(range 18–29)
SPM99
Kober et al. (2010) 21 9/12 Pictures of food and cigarettes Down-regulation > baseline 26.8 (8.94) SPM5
Koenigsberg et al. (2009) 16 9/7 IAPS, negative interpersonal
scenes
Distance > look 31.8 (7.7) SPM2
Lang et al. (2012) 15 15/0 Standardized negative and
neutral scripts from the
Affective Norms for English
Text (ANET)
Enhance > maintain (early)
Enhance > maintain (late)
Distance > maintain (early)
Distance > maintain (late)
24.73 (5.64) SPM8
Mak et al. (2009) 24 12/12 IAPS and popular media,
negative and positive
Female: reduce negative > view negative
Male: reduce negative > view negative
Female: reduce positive > view positive
male: reduce positive > view positive
f: 24 (1.78)
m: 24 (1.68)
SPM2
McRae et al. (2008) 23 n.a. IAPS, negative Decrease > look f: 20.6
m: 20.36
(range 18–22)
SPM2
McRae et al. (2010) 18 18/0 IAPS and in-house set,
negative
Decrease > look masked by distraction > look 24.4 (3.5) SPM2
Modinos et al. (2010) 18 7/11 IAPS, negative Reappraisal > attend 21.1 (2.8) SPM5
Ochsner et al. (2002) 15 15/0 IAPS, negative Reappraise > attend/view 21.9
(range 18–30)
SPM99
Ochsner et al. (2004) 23 23/0 IAPS, negative Increase > look
Reappraise > look
20.6 SPM99
Phan et al. (2005) 14 8/6 IAPS, negative Reappraise > baseline
Reappraise > maintain
27.6 (4.4) SPM99
Schulze et al. (2011) 15 15/0 IAPS and similar pictures,
negative
Decrease > maintain
Increase > maintain
24.53 (2.85) SPM5
Wager et al. (2008) 30 18/12 IAPS, negative Reappraise > look Median 22.3 SPM2
Walter et al. (2009) 18 18/0 IAPS, negative and
neutral
Decrease negative > no-regulation neutral
Decrease > no-regulation
Decrease negative > no-regulation negative
Decrease neutral > no-regulation neutral
24(3) SPM2
Winecoff et al. (2011) 42 n.a. IAPS, negative and positive Decrease positive > experience positive
Decrease negative > experience negative
Older: 69 (3.9)
younger: 23.1
(4)
FSL