Table 2.
Power to detect difference in
| Rs1,jw |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0.8 | 4.8 | 15.5 | 98.7 | 14.6 | 98.2 | |||||
| 0.5 | 5.7 | 13.7 | 93.4 | 9.7 | 88.3 | ||||||
|
|
0.8 | 5.4 | 74.2 | 5.3 | 69.5 | ||||||
| 0.5 | 5.5 | 64.5 | 5.6 | 49.1 | |||||||
|
|
0.8 | 4.9 | 86.1 | 14.1 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 5.2 | 80.7 | 7.5 | ||||||||
|
|
(0.8, 0.8) | 5.1 | 79.1 | ||||||||
| (0.5, 0.5) | 5.8 | 78.2 | |||||||||
|
|
(0.8, 0.8) | 5.4 | |||||||||
| (0.5, 0.5) | 5.6 |
Wald test for comparing two candidate surrogates by testing .
Multivariate candidate PS,
For multivariate surrogate candidates ρs1,jw stands for (Rs1,1w, Rs1,2w).
indicates that the candidate surrogate was generated using a censored normal distribution.