Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 19;16(2):241. doi: 10.3390/s16020241

Table 3.

Average mutual information values results of all subjects for the proposed algorithm against ADJUST and REGICA for all electrodes.

Electrode Location Proposed ADJUST REGICA
Fp1 2.7148 0.6680 1.4023
Fp2 2.6286 0.7578 1.4563
F7 2.7169 1.1796 1.9115
F3 2.7165 1.2789 2.0176
Fz 2.6973 1.3932 1.9717
F2 2.6434 1.3789 2.0190
F8 2.5538 1.4237 1.8863
FC5 2.6946 1.2919 2.3216
FC3 2.5262 1.5692 2.3181
FC2 2.5720 1.8742 2.3239
FC6 2.6034 1.8046 2.1482
T7 2.7158 1.4571 2.3656
C3 2.6685 1.4754 2.3942
Cz 2.7435 2.0669 2.4309
C4 2.6075 1.9813 2.3062
T8 2.6611 1.8524 2.3069
TP9 2.6515 1.5851 2.3234
CP5 2.6888 1.5566 2.4402
CP1 2.6669 2.0910 2.4864
CP2 2.7186 2.1592 2.4384
CP6 2.5839 2.0236 2.3601
TP10 2.6307 1.9541 2.3272
P7 2.5600 1.8588 2.4463
P3 2.6275 2.1776 2.4715
Pz 2.6076 2.1811 2.3613
P2 2.6230 2.1739 2.3948
P8 2.6290 2.0796 2.4958
PO9 2.6540 2.2194 2.4626
O1 2.6597 2.1380 2.4375
Oz 2.6758 2.2584 2.4655
O2 2.5836 1.9191 2.3257
PO10 2.6514 2.1337 2.4338
Average 2.6461 1.7488 2.2578