Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jan 6;22(4):705–709. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.12.028

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of Study Participants

Patient Disease HCT Donor NK Donor Age (y) Karyotype Pre-treatment blasts Time to relapse (m) Time relapse to NK infusion (m) Acute GVHD (grade) Therapy for post HCT relapse
1 MDS Matched sib Child 53.8 del 20q 0% 93.6 58.0 None DLI, azacitidine
2 AML Matched sib Sibling 55.9 del 20q 0% 33.2 10.0 Skin (2) Surgical resection
3 MPAL* Matched sib Parent 29.7 Complex 1% 5.2 1.3 None Chemotherapy
4 AML Matched Sib Parent 8.4 t(9;11), del 20q 75% 2.4 1.5 Skin (2) Chemotherapy
5 AML Matched sib Parent 2.0 t(1;5), +20q 21% 3.1 5.6 None Chemotherapy
6 AML Matched sib Parent 1.9 t(9p;12p) 23% 3.0 4.2 None Chemotherapy
7 AML Matched sib Parent 2.5 t(3q;11p) 71% 3.8 2.7 None Chemotherapy
8 MDS URD Sibling 32.3 Complex 8% 1.0 4.3 None None
*

Mixed phenotype acute leukemia