Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2015 Mar 11;46(4):439–448. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2015.03.002

Table 1.

Correlations among key study variables

NSSI Fx T1 NU T1 Plan T1 Pers T1 SS T1 PU T2 NU T2 Plan T2 Pers T2 SS
NSSI Fx
T1 NU .15*
T1 Plan .02 .35*
T1 Pers .11* .35* .43*
T1 SS −.04 .07 .28* −.13*
T1 PU .04 .65* .43* .37* .14*
T2 NU .18* .69* .29* .31* .09* .51*
T2 Plan .02 .30* .65* .29* .23* .37* .37*
T2 Pers .13* .29* .32* .67* −.09* .29* .41* .51*
T2 SS −.04 .05 .23* −.07 .77* .12* .13* .14* −.12
T2 PU .07 .45* .30* .25* .19* .61* .73* .44* .38* .26*

Note. NSSI Fx = mean NSSI frequency at Time 1; this variable was only measured at Time 1. T1 NU = Time 1 negative urgency, T1 Plan = Time 1 lack of planning, T1 Pers = Time 1 lack of perseverance, T1 SS = Time 1 sensation seeking, T1 PU = Time 1 positive urgency. At Time 2, the corresponding variables are denoted with T2 NU, Plan, Pers, SS, PU.

*

p < .01.